Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
No comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

On Washington Post's Defense of Judith Miller

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It


Become a Fan
  (112 fans)

opednews.com

Washington Post

To the Editor:

Richard Cohen's defense of Judith Miller's principles (Aug. 2) defends the New York Times reporter from attacks on her honest mistakes, and suggests that other reporters and the Bush Administration made honest mistakes as well. But this completely misses the point being made by those who maintain that Miller's is not a good case on which to build a defense of journalists' rights, as well as the point being made by critics of Bush's drive to war.

We maintain that there is compelling evidence of dishonesty by both Bush and Miller, that Miller is not a journalist, and that Miller's sources are not sources.

For the case against Bush, see, among other things, your June 28, 2005, front page article on the Downing Street Memos, which -- after massive public pressure -- was printed about a week after your editorial claiming that those documents "add nothing to what was publicly known in July 2002." Known to whom? Clearly you can't answer "Judith Miller" and continue to defend her work.

For the case against Miller and her sources, begin with these considerations:


Miller made clear through her writing and affiliations that she favored an attack on Iraq. She's been promoted as a speaker for the Middle East Forum, which advocated attacking Iraq. She's published books widely criticized as anti-Muslim.

Miller formally accepted US Military censorship of her articles for the New York Times, violating a standard of journalism at least as significant as that of loyalty to honest sources.

Miller used as a primary source for her horror stories about WMDs a man with a conviction for embezzlement, a reputation for fraud, a publicly stated interest in moving the United States to attack Iraq, and knowledge of Iraq limited by his not having lived there for four decades.

Miller took the bizarre step of reporting on claims that WMDs had actually been found while making fairly clear that the US military had not allowed her to actually SPEAK TO her "source."

Miller's articles routinely present claims that support militarism as unquestionable or confirmed, although they come from a single source with an obvious interest in the story.

If the above considerations are not enough, consider that the source(s) whom Miller is now protecting are known now (even, presumably, to Judith Miller) to have been engaged not in whistleblowing but in attacking a man who was blowing a whistle on their fraudulent justifications for war. Protecting dishonest sources whose motivation was not to educate a democratic public but to send its young people to kill and die for a lie is not journalistic ethics. It may be mafia ethics or Tom Delay ethics, but it's not journalism.

Of course we must protect the right of journalists to confidential sources. And of course that must include journalists whom I don't like. But stenography for military officials is not journalism, and when it masquerades as journalism it becomes extremely damaging.

Would Bush have gone ahead with his war without Judith Miller? Sure. But that excuses neither her nor anyone else who assisted him, and Richard Cohen's suggestion that it does raises questions about your general grasp of ethics.

Sincerely,

David Swanson

 

http://davidswanson.org

David Swanson is the author of "When the World Outlawed War," "War Is A Lie" and "Daybreak: Undoing the Imperial Presidency and Forming a More Perfect Union." He blogs at http://davidswanson.org and http://warisacrime.org and works for the online (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Feith Dares Obama to Enforce the Law

Obama's Open Forum Opens Possibilities

Public Forum Planned on Vermont Proposal to Arrest Bush and Cheney

Did Bush Sr. Kill Kennedy and Frame Nixon?

Holder Asked to Prosecute Blankenship

Eleven Excellent Reasons Not to Join the Military

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments