By now you have heard all the stories on how Ron Paul is a racist
or how he might be.The fact of the matter is simple really; you have to
decide for yourself. When you compare the stories written under his
name in a newsletter against everything he has ever said he becomes
clear what happened. All the time spent analyzing the story is working
to the advantage of those who put the story out. What is important is
the issue that are being brought up indirectly by the story. If you have
followed Dr. Ron Paul even moderately you knew about this a long time
ago and should come as no surprise. So the question is why is everyone
seemingly so shocked. Do you mean to tell me that TV pundits just read
what they are brought or do they actually look some of this stuff up
themselves? In that regard how often do they do this with more
important stories? For me, the question of how often TV pundits
research anything at all is a big deal. It would seem that it doesn’t
happen at all if you listened to Wolf Blitzer’s interview of Dr. Paul about
the smear campaign.
