Tags for This Article:

Bush Admin (1980)  Security (1140)  Terrorism (944) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ;
Add to My Group
October 25, 2007 at 23:37:33

Just For the Sake of Argument, What Would It Look Like If a President Didn't Give a Damn About Terrorism?

by David Michael Green     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

One thing all Americans can agree on, that’s for sure: terrorism is bad news.

Yep – left, right and center – we all want protection from bad people who possess even badder weapons. (Sorry if that comes as a shock to the certifiables of the Ridiculous Right, but it’s true. Even we lefties don’t want to die, nor do we hate America – though if there’s another Republican presidency next term, we may have to reconsider that last part.)

So, given that desire we all share for security from political violence, it sure is a good thing that ol’ W is in the White House, isn’t it, riding shotgun on the ship of state (forgive the mixed metaphor, but it seemed particularly appropriate considering the subject)? I mean, he talks about terrorism all the bloody time! Plus, he’s tight with Jesus. That’s gotta mean something, don’t you think? Surely – like Con Ed – he’s "On it!" when it comes to terrorism, and we can all sleep better knowing that.

If you doubt for a minute how crucial this is, imagine how bad things would be if some other Joe Bob was in the Oval Office, instead of Steady George. Rudy Giuliani got it, and right away too. He claims to have said to Bernard Kerik as the buildings came down on 9/11, "Thank God George Bush is our president". I don’t know if they were in their secret taxpayer-funded Manhattan love-nest where they used to like to bring the babes or somewhere else when he said this, but you get the point. And, hey, where could you ever find a more knowing trio on the subject of political crime than Georgie, Rudy and Bernie, eh? These cats know their stuff!

Imagine if an incompetent and insufficiently masculine boob like Al ‘Sore Loserman’ Gore or, gulp, French-speaking John Kerry had been at the helm these last years. Or Hillary! Ack! Talk about your scary scenarios. Things might have really gone awry.

To begin with, a wimpy Democrat president probably wouldn’t have paid any attention at all to the terrorism question during his or her first months in office, even if the alarm bells were going off like crazy that a big attack was planned. Probably a Hillary type would have been all obsessed about Iraq, instead, her cabinet refusing to even meet on the terrorism question until a week before 9/11.

And even had they been warned in a Presidential Daily Briefing that the attack was imminent, these slouches would have been likely to have spent the month before 9/11 on vacation, as part of a wider and quite successful effort to set the all-time presidential record for most days spent screwing off (and that’s only the officially acknowledged ones).

And just as Bush and Cheney had once slogged their way through the mud and the jungles of Vietnam while Gore and Kerry were home hiding out and partying, no doubt the latter two would have been equally hard to find on 9/11. You could just imagine them flying off to – oh, I don’t know, Nebraska! – in the face of national danger. Or sitting in a grade school classroom reading children’s books. Or both.

I’m sure that’s what Rudy meant when he supposedly spoke those famous words on 9/11 about Bush being president. (Less well noted was the sentence he uttered right before: "Shit, why didn’t I gave those first-responders the radio equipment they kept asking for – there go my presidential plans". Or the one right after: "Jesus Christ, whose idiotic idea was it to put the emergency response command center in the twin towers!!")

But what Rudy really had on his mind as he was thanking the deity whose house he hadn’t visited for quite some time (until his presidential campaign began, of course) was that we should all be thankful to have a president with the wisdom and the seasoned foreign policy experience of George W. Bush, a guy who would therefore know what to do next (I mean, he had actually been to Mexico once, and to China as a kid!).

Rudy knew that Bush could be counted on to nail the folks accused of doing 9/11, bringing them in "dead or alive". If there was one thing that this ruthless former prosecutor knew for sure it was that there was no way that Sheriff George would let, say, six whole years (that’s two thousand one hundred and ninety-one days, in case you’re wondering) go by and the perp bastards who did this crime remain untouched, plotting the next attack. No way!

Moreover, there’s more than one way to screw-up national defense, and lord knows the Dumb Dems would have found them all if they were still in the White House having their heterosexual love affairs and stuff like that. For example, what Bush understood and no Democrat ever would have is the importance of the commander-in-chief keeping his eye on the ball. When you’re trying to win a war against the terrorists who attacked you, you can’t be running around indulging your personal whims and invading other countries that had nothing to do with attacking America, y’know? And you especially can’t do it when the result would be to tie down all your land forces in a war that bears no relationship to the greater goal whatsoever, other than that it is breaking your military to bits and leaving it incapable of fighting anywhere it might actually be needed.

And it could actually get worse from there. Remember how Lyndon Johnson, that loony liberal par excellence, used to stay up at night selecting bombing targets in Vietnam and otherwise micromanaging his military? Not George Bush! No way. He just deciderers the big decisions, then leaves management to his talented stable of pros like Rumsfeld, Cheney, Tenet, Wolfowitz and Bremer. That’s how he could avoid stupid Democratic mistakes like sending in too few troops, or dismissing the local army and sending them home armed, unemployed and angry, or allowing looting and chaos from Day One. Maybe "stuff happens" on the Donkey watch, but not when the grown-ups are in charge. Without this kind of GOP, private sector, MBA-style management know-how, heck, we could’ve gotten stuck in a protracted war with no end, no exit, and no relevance to our real national security concerns.

No relevance, that is, except that it would absolutely alienate our allies and inflame an entire region of people who would otherwise be neutral or perhaps even friendly toward us. Such a dumb Hillarywar would not only fail to eradicate terrorists, but would undoubtedly result in creating them by the thousands. You wouldn’t need the unanimous opinion of America’s sixteen intelligence agencies to clue you in on that one, fella!

Another thing about Bush that’s cool is that the guy’s just plain smart. You can tell, even without the eloquence that infuses so much of his rhetoric. This dude is truly one of the brightest presidents yet, and he’s not afraid to show it. I imagine if John Kennedy was still around he might say of Bush that "There has never been a greater concentration of intellectual power here at the White House since Thomas Jefferson’s cat dined alone". Bush knows that America is still highly vulnerable to attack, unlike those latter-day Chamberlains of the Wussy Party. That’s why he’s blown right past the entrenched interests of the monied class and forced them to take care of business in order to insure our national security, like inspecting shipping containers and reinforcing security at nuclear energy and chemical plants. No doubt a wimp like Hillary would have let them just pocket the money and continue leaving the public at risk.

And, you know, what’s really sickening about liberals is how hypocritical they can be. You could readily imagine them running all over the world lecturing other countries on fighting terrorism – "You’re either with us or you’re against us!" – while at the same time harboring a known terrorist like, say, oh, I don’t know, Luis Posada, here at home and protecting him from extradition to face justice at the scene of his crimes. Bush knows well that no one would take us seriously if America were to do something as ridiculous as sheltering a guy who blew up an airliner full of civilians, just because they happened to be Cuban. He knows that terrorism is terrorism, regardless of the politics involved or who the victims are.

 1  |  2

 

www.regressiveantidote.net

David Michael Green is a professor of political science at Hofstra University in New York.  He is delighted to receive readers' reactions to his articles (dmg@regressiveantidote.net), but regrets that time constraints do not always allow him to respond. His website is www.regressiveantidote.net.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 comments

Living in Chiang Rai, Thailand with my wife and two daughters. Worked with the DoD for ten years in the USA. Currently employed as a field geophysicist working rotational assignments around the globe. Wanted to be a journalist as a freshman in high school. Chose geophysics as a major in college.
sdkLiving in Chiang Rai, Thailand with my wife and two daughters. Worked with the DoD for ten years in the USA. Currently employed as a field geophysicist working rotational assignments around the globe. Wanted to be a journalist as a freshman in high school. Chose geophysics as a major in college.

Plausibility and Conspiracy

There has not been any sound and reasonable explanation for the variety of events that occurred on 11-September.  Many things happened that day, and not too many people know with certainty how and why.

This is fertile ground for alternative theories to be argued.  This concept of "conspiracy theory" annoys the hell out of reasonable people.  Questioning authority - that which, by the way has provided really bad explanations for all the failures of that day - is not a conspiracy, it is healthy democracy, it is scientific method, it is searching for answers.  The real tragedy is that no one wants to ask the questions. 

OK, some very poor science is written in "Popular Mechanics."  But, there is also good scientific questions being ignored.  Not answering, not digging, not addressing is not tantamount to being correct.  The MSM not giving more voice to these questions is the real tragedy and conspiracy.

The problem is that most journalists - most the public - do not know enough about science, architecture, planes or anything to form an idependent opinion about those events.  And yet they do, day after day.  Sean Hannity will say he believes the official story and so will Bill Maher.  But, so what?  Are these guys leading scientific minds?  They are not qualified to have any opinion, and yet they do.  They voice it with authority.  But, what authority?

An idependent inquiry, such that occurred with the Challenger disaster is what we need.  Real scientist, like Richard Feyman, can cut through the B.S. with sharp clarity, like when he dipped a rubber gasket in cold water and showed everyone simply how the well designed system can fail.  No conspiracy, just a simple demonstration.

Truthers want the truth.  Thousands have died from the events of 11-Sept.  Every alternate idea is not the same.  And grouping every challenge to authority is bandwagon illogic.

NIST still has not answered the questions about WTC 7, for instance.  So, what is so wrong with idependent thinkers to present their own theories?

 

 

 

by sdk (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 6 comments) on Friday, October 26, 2007 at 4:45:08 AM
 

 

2 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Obama Must Appoint a Consumer Protectionist as FDA Commissioner by Stephen Fox

Naomi Wolf Must Watch Video: A Coup Took Place on October 1, 2008 by youtube

BARACK OBAMA On Gandhi's Birthday by Stephen Fox

CBS's Spoiled Poodle Dean Reynolds Bites Obama-- Reports his Plane Smells by Rob Kall

What I Learned At The Sarah Palin Rally Before They Threw Me Out! by Linda Milazzo

The dangerous McCain/Palin character assassination of Obama by Sherman Yellen

Return of the Jedi by Ferdinand

How low can Palin go? by Deb Della Piana

Onward, Christian Soldiers (Redux) by Shirley Bianchi

This is Your Nation on White Privilege Posted by Siv O'Neall

Go To Top 50 Most Popular