Tags for This Article:

Republican (2393)  Democratic (1911)  Reid-Harry (146) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ;
Add to My Group
July 19, 2007 at 21:46:41

When Harry Met Harry: Reid Finally Starts Channeling Truman Instead of Dukakis

by David Michael Green     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

Progressives have spent years and decades now lamenting the woeful lack of political courage on the part of the Democratic Party in Washington, the supposed ‘leadership’ of the supposed ‘opposition’ party.

They – we – have been right to do so, because the performance of this crowd has been abysmal, and the cost of their coopted indifference has been astronomical. If you need any proof of that you could ask the one million dead people of Iraq who were decimated while the Democratic Party was asleep at the switch. Except, er, for one minor problem. Did I mention that they’re dead people?

That, of course, is only the most egregious example. Since Ronald Reagan rode into town a quarter-century ago on a horse which could somehow miraculously produce bovine excrement, ‘dem DC Dems have mostly been cowering in the corner, making deer caught in headlights look powerfully proactive by comparison. Of course, it all got far worse when the Little Texas Terror came to Worshintuhn six years ago, dripping with entitlement and all the emotional maturity of a junior high prom spiked with vodka and Hawaiian Punch.

What always floored me – both with Reagan and especially L’Enfant Terrible – was how little it took to roll the pathetic Democrats. On almost any given issue, these bullies never had public opinion on their side. They never had truth on their side. No one ever accused either of these monsters of being smart. So what, then? Were Democrats charmed into submission? Were they wooed into dropping their drawers by a smooth-talking ... George W. Bush? (Eeeewwwww.)

No, they were mugged by straw men, all while carrying lighter fluid in one pocket and a box of matches in the other. "But I could show my prowess, Be a lion not a mowess, If I only had the nerve..."

It’s been a pathetic sight to see. Leader after leader of the party has donned the seemingly requisite costume – effete manner, soft-spoken delivery, poor-posture, wire-rim glasses – and duly offered up themselves (and us) for slaughter. Who amongst us wasn’t ready to go to the ramparts for cheerful Dick Gephardt? What an inspirational sight Tom Daschle made, meekly whispering his dissent, eh? What a call to arms has been Harry Reid’s measured tones of disagreement with the White House, no? Who wasn’t inspired by Nancy Pelosi’s capitulation before she was even sworn in?

You know, there’s no shame in getting beat up. The shame (in spades) is in getting beat up by a punk like George W. Bush, wielding a handbag as a weapon. Without even fighting back. With truth watching your back, and the public holding your coat. Now that is shameful.

Progressives have rightly and angrily denounced these failures of leadership in the only party they can reasonably hope could be a vehicle for a semi-sane politics in the American empire. And so it is only fair that we also recognize the Democratic leadership when they occasionally get it right. Not that fairness, mind you, has much of a role in the game of politics as played in Washington, and not that finally showing up after a million people are already dead and another four million have been turned into refugees constitutes getting it right anywhere but in Washington, of course.

But just as it’s important to show encouragement to children and household pets in order to reinforce desired behavior, so we will have to potty-train our Democratic leaders until they finally get it right, mixing scolds in response to mistakes with praise and cookies when they manage to do the right thing.

In the former category is Cindy Sheehan’s threat to demolish Nancy Pelosi in her own home district if the Speaker fails to impeach Bush and Cheney.

In the latter is this article, in which I am sending Harry Reid a very big cookie for finally learning to play even moderately hard ball against the viciously destructive Republican death machine.

After the harrowing and disgusting capitulation of Reid and Pelosi to Bush’s incredibly weak hand in the Iraq war appropriation matter a month or so ago, I and other critics berated the Democrats for not even using the institutional powers available to them as the majority party in Congress to exact a toll from the GOP for their murderous intransigence. We lambasted the Dems for failing even to force Republicans to own the consequences of their war policies, let alone for not articulating a cogent alternative.

Well, apparently somebody was listening, because this week Senator Reid began to get it right.

I have to hand it to him. When he demanded that Republicans actually carry through on their filibuster threat this week by remaining in session through the night, he did a multitude of necessary and helpful things all at once.

First, he is making them sacrifice for their intransigence. Literally. Republicans could no longer phone it in. They had to be there, not out partying at Jack Abramoff’s bar and grill or raising desperately needed funds to try preventing what already has all the makings of a landslide blow-out in 2008.

Second, by making this move, Democrats go on the offensive. They stop reacting to Rovian tactics, always getting broadsided, always looking and acting defensive, always choosing from the lousy alternatives Rove has left them. They generate a newsworthy event, and win control of the news cycle. And they do it on their terms.

 1  |  2

 

www.regressiveantidote.net

David Michael Green is a professor of political science at Hofstra University in New York.  He is delighted to receive readers' reactions to his articles (dmg@regressiveantidote.net), but regrets that time constraints do not always allow him to respond. His website is www.regressiveantidote.net.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 comments

Been around the block a few times.
Blue PilgrimBeen around the block a few times.

All of which shows

that if enough people, for lonh enough, light fires under a donkey's rear and smack him the forhead with a two by four, it is *possible* to get its attention. But what an ordeal for just one baby step forward! (And such a long way to go yet.)

But let us not overlook the other force at work -- the corporations with the money who fund both parties. There is a time to sow and a time to reap -- and a time to back off after profit-taking, and dump the front men and used-up useful idiots. Drink your fill and leave the dregs for others -- crusts tossed under the table for the dogs.

The bill in question was not actually going to bring back all the troops anyway, and not even some in a timely manner, so it was a cheap gambit.  But what if it had passed? What would it look like 8 months from now -- the 'great and bold sucessful initiative'? Disaster (but it never had a chance of passing, and also surviving veto - the emergency safety hatch). See the bill. See the timing and the exceptions. See the troops totaled out by then anyway. See the troops run because by then there would be no alternative anyway. See the empty posturing -- while impeachment is STILL off the table!

So in the end, this was a very small baby step indeed, and more a pony show than a donkey setting to work. They may be playing badly, but the style seems clear enough to me -- the Democrats have gone hypermodern.

by Blue Pilgrim (0 articles, 3 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 997 comments) on Friday, July 20, 2007 at 1:57:47 AM
 


Richard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.
Richard MynickRichard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.

This article shows how one can master the details, yet still

miss badly on the larger picture. Prof Green is a talented writer & sophisticated observer. He's well aware of the chronic deficiencies of Democrats, saying explicitly that we should "...potty-train our Democratic leaders until they finally get it right, mixing scolds...with praise and cookies." So you'd think he'd be a "tough grader" -- the last guy to ever make the mistake of letting them off with unearned high marks.

Yet when all is said & done, that's just what he does. He can't resist the temptation to see the Democrats as "the only cards left to play" against the Dark Side. He winds up making upbeat predictions that the corner has now been turned, & in the months ahead we'll be seeing Fightin' Harry Reid & his band of Firebreathin' Dems standing up tough to the Big Mean Bullies.

This prediction will prove wrong. In focusing too much on the details of the Dem-vs-Repub tactical sparring, Prof Green is failing to see the forest for the trees. He's losing sight of the real function of the Democrats in the political system, the real social forces they represent, & hence their fundamental political character.

Prof Green understandably hopes that the newly "invigorated" Dems will catch fire & stand up to the GOP bullies, revealing them for the scoundrels that they are. But that's not the Dems' line of business. They don't exist to "expose Republican perfidy, once and for all." The Dems' worst nightmare would be that the Republicans should be permanently destroyed & discredited. They fully accept the vision of an America with a permanent 2-party system; where the media functions like today's; where both parties work for the same corporate oligarchy, & both cooperate in the permanent project of growing the military-industrial complex, the national security state, & supporting US overseas interventions. 

If the tussles between Dems & Repubs were likened to a struggle between gladiators, & the Dems found themselves poised victorious over their opponent with their sword at his throat, they would voluntarily choose to throw down the sword. They wouldn't even have to look up at the emperor to get the "thumbs up" signal -- they know perfectly well that the emperor doesn't want them to "finish off" their rival. They understand & accept this; & know perfectly well that they are forever joined at the hip with him. Their role is permanent collaboration. To joust in the arena, yes; but to destroy their rival -- never.

Many decent people who vote for Democrats, including Prof Green, would love to see them stick the metaphorical sword into their rivals' throat, & dispatch the bastard for good. But that's not in the Dems' DNA, as follows from their true role in the social system.

by Richard Mynick (2 articles, 3 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 1211 comments) on Friday, July 20, 2007 at 10:59:46 AM
 

 

2 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Keith Olbermann Broke Up With Me! by Shannyn Moore

Special Message for Tibetans Living In and Outside of Tibet Posted by Stephen Fox

Study Confirms Genetically Modified Crops Threaten Human Fertility and Health Safety Posted by sadelaine

Children dying in Haiti, victims of food crisis exacerbated by four devastating tropical storms Posted by Stephen Fox

SO SAY THE BANKERS: Learn to Love the 'AMERO' by Patrick Henningsen

Getting Through the Coming Depression by Bernard Weiner

Kucinich is Still Rockin' My World Toward Peace by Meryl Ann Butler

Tim Robbins: An Open Letter to the New York City Board of Elections by Tim Robbins

Obama is Already Stirring Controversy by The Old Codger

Senate testimony by police captain reveals 9 sticks of missing dynamite in 'Omaha Two' bombing case by Michael Richardson

Go To Top 50 Most Popular