Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Sen. Gravel Tries to Make Government Work

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (10 fans)
Former Sen. Mike Gravel, a contender for the Libertarian Party presidential nomination, is a supporter of the National Initiative for Democracy. This legislation would give the people the power to make laws, bypassing congress. While advocated, no doubt, with the best of intentions this is precisely the prescription for dictatorship that the Founders warned us against.

In The Federalist No. 10, The Utility of the Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection (continued), James Madison warned against such democracy:

A common passion or interest will, in almost every case, be felt by a majority of the whole; a communication and concert result from the form of government itself; and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party or an obnoxious individual. Hence it is that such democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths. Theoretic politicians, who have patronized this species of government, have erroneously supposed that by reducing mankind to a perfect equality in their political rights, they would, at the same time, be perfectly equalized and assimilated in their possessions, their opinions, and their passions.


The other dark side to the National Initiative for Democracy is that it gives the illusion of power to the people. This is a dangerous illusion that will be exploited by power hungry politicians using their usual arsenal of scare tactics to whip the people into a frenzy. In such a state they will approve of just about anything. Look no further than the invasion of Iraq for evidence of this.

Sen. Gravel’s web page about the National Initiative for Democracy states, "It is important to understand that the National Initiative does not alter the existing structure or powers of representative governments. Rather, it adds an additional Check –– the People –– to our system of Checks and Balances, while setting up a working partnership between the people and their elected representatives." Just as all the other constitutional checks and balances have been overcome and many even twisted into instruments of repression, so will the National initiative. The "working partnership" will become another means of manipulating the people, not a means for the people to restrain the government.

Things are bad enough as they are. If the people become accustomed to voting directly for all manor of things what’s to stop them from voting for even worse measures? Nothing, and Sen. Gravel gives us proof of this on his own website, "More than 70% of the voters already make laws by initiative in twenty-four states and in numerous local communities, and when voting on bond issues referred to them for decision by their representatives ––serious lawmaking." People tend to approve bond issues without thinking about the higher taxes they will require when they come due. They tend to trust the politicians judgment about what the money needs to be spent on, deficits be damned. What they almost invariably approve is more pork for the politicians to pass around.

Who decides what gets voted on in these initiatives? From the National Initiative for Democracy website:



# Qualification of Initiatives

Initiatives can qualify for election in any of three ways:

* Referral by the legislature;
* Citizen petition; or
* Public opinion poll.

As to the first method, it’s obviously the politicians in control. The second and third methods, petition and opinion poll, the problem also seems obvious, it will be special interests and, you guessed it, politicians that organize them. Meaning that the people will be dancing to their tune, not the other way around.

Control of the process is in the wrong hands, again, from the National Initiative for Democracy website, "The initiative process will be administered by the Electoral Trust, an independent agency of government." The government administers the process, enough said.

The National Initiative for Democracy is a dangerous, populist idea that must be rejected along with Sen. Gravel’s candidacy.

 

http://theinternationallibertarian.blogspot.com/

Darren Wolfe, otherwise known as The International Libertarian, is the former Eastern Vice Chair of the Libertarian Party of Pennsylvania. He grew up in Puerto Rico and lived in Venezuela for seven years, including the first year of Chavez' rule. (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Judicial Crackdown on Jury Rights Activists in Florida

The Evil Lincoln

Boycott Philly? Why Philadelphia's Licensing and Taxing of Blogs is Creeping Fascism

POLICE STATE 2010: Philly Cops Stopping & Searching Random People On The Street; Over 250,000 So Far

Did McCain Choose Palin to Forestall NRA Endorsement of Barr?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 5 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

You composed a rhetorical argument without referri... by Joshua Pritikin on Wednesday, May 14, 2008 at 7:04:52 PM
Joshua,Welcome to OpEdNews.com.You wrote:"You... by Darren Wolfe on Wednesday, May 14, 2008 at 9:06:42 PM
as an example of success in democracy? women ... by steve scheetz on Thursday, May 15, 2008 at 8:11:15 AM
Its ironic that Darren Wolfe quotes James Madison ... by Ty on Monday, May 19, 2008 at 8:06:38 PM
Government by politicians is what needs to be reje... by Ty on Monday, May 19, 2008 at 8:12:46 PM