OpEdNews Op Eds

Government-run health care in Philadelphia: about as efficient as you'd expect

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

- Advertisement -

As y’all know, I have said that I support going to a single-payer health care plan. But I have never said that we’d get better health care out of it, and actually expect our health care system to get worse under such a system.

From Thursday’s Philadelphia Inquirer:

    Long waits cited in city health care¹
    The controller reported an average of five months to see a doctor. One center may be skewing the figures.
    By Kia Gregory, Philadelphia Inquirer Staff Writer

    It takes patients at the city’s health centers an average of more than five months to get an appointment to see a doctor, according to a report released yesterday by the city controller.

    In comparison, it took 15 days to get an appointment in New York City and only seven days in Baltimore, according to the report.

    “Studies show that prevention is oftentimes the best medicine,” City Controller Alan Butkovitz said in releasing the report. “In the case of our health clinics, prevention is on the back burner.”

    Tom Storey, director of ambulatory services for the city’s Department of Public Health, attributes the long average wait time to delays at the Cottman Avenue center in the Northeast.

    “Health Center 10 is certainly our greatest challenge,” Storey said. “We believe it reflects the few choices that people have. There are not other community centers available. There are not a lot of hospitals in that area. In our opinion, it really does reflect a demand for service.”

    There are eight public health-care centers throughout the city, and, according to Health Department data, most of the 85,000 patients who visited them last year were African American and Hispanic adults mired in poverty.

    - Advertisement -

    About half of their 320,000 visits were uninsured.

But, of course, that means that about half did have health insurance.

I can’t quote the whole article, due to copyright restrictions, but the next three paragraphs explain just how well Philadelphia’s public health department serves patients:

    Sitting outside the city health center at Broad and Morris Streets yesterday, Dawn Price, waiting for her ride, was fuming.

    For more than a week, she had been wincing from stomach pain, and she had gone to the center yesterday only to be told to come back Friday.

    The doctor wasn’t in.

    - Advertisement -

The rest of the story contains the defenses of the city’s health department, with the director saying how good the system is, but it’s all bogus. Even the math is bogus: they want to blame the average delay of five months on one particular health care center, out of a total of eight. Unless that one particular center sees fully half of the patients, it’s average waiting time would have to be nine months for the other seven centers to average a wait of only one month. As you increase the percentage of patients seen by the other seven centers, the average wait of the one particularly bad one would have to increase significantly.

Translation: the Inquirer article doesn’t tell us the whole story — which isn’t a surprise.

What a surprise: in a government-run health care system, patients are treated to delay after delay in being seen and treated. Well, that’s what happens in Canada and the United Kingdom and the other socialized medicine countries, isn’t it? Why should we expect the City of Brotherly Love — where half of the public high school students drop out — to do any better?

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://commonsensepoliticalthought.com

Editor of Common Sense Political Thought, mostly Republican (but not always), mostly conservative (but again, not always), always interesting.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Cash for Clunkers: A visit to my local Ford dealer

Daniel Geery and the Freedom of Speech

Nataline Sarkisyan and the costs of health care

The War That Cannot End

Rob Kall and the purposes of going to church

Government-run health care in Philadelphia: about as efficient as you'd expect

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 people are discussing this page, with 9 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

As Dick Cheney said, "So?" Why not compa... by Rob Kall on Friday, Apr 11, 2008 at 5:34:07 AM
Rob, Wouldn't it be smarter to reverse philly&... by Darren Wolfe on Friday, Apr 11, 2008 at 1:15:24 PM
.  .  . coverage, you see the same types... by Dana Pico on Friday, Apr 11, 2008 at 8:05:52 PM
I think you are talking about a charity.... by John Hanks on Friday, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:03:00 AM
Your comments indicate that you are clueless about... by Jerry Policoff on Friday, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:29:29 PM
Jerry,It's true that the first paragraph is a ... by Darren Wolfe on Friday, Apr 11, 2008 at 1:02:47 PM
It works for the rest of the civilized world, and ... by Jerry Policoff on Friday, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:14:55 PM
The ones who don't know what they're talki... by Darren Wolfe on Friday, Apr 11, 2008 at 6:38:24 PM
i don't know much about government run health ... by Gary Denson on Friday, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:19:16 PM