Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ;
Add to My Group
February 3, 2008 at 07:55:56

View Ratings | Rate It

Since Mrs Clinton is trying to claim her husband's experience as her own . . .

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By Dana Pico (about the author)     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Dana Pico - Writer

. . . in telling us that she’s the candidate who has the experience to be president, does that mean she also gets the responsibility for Mr Clinton’s other actions?

    After Mining Deal, Financier Donated to Clinton Charity
    By Jo Becker and Don Van Natta Jr., The New York Times

     

    Late on Sept. 6, 2005, a private plane carrying the Canadian mining financier Frank Giustra touched down in Almaty, a ruggedly picturesque city in southeast Kazakhstan. Several hundred miles to the west a fortune awaited: highly coveted deposits of uranium that could fuel nuclear reactors around the world. And Mr. Giustra was in hot pursuit of an exclusive deal to tap them.

    Unlike more established competitors, Mr. Giustra was a newcomer to uranium mining in Kazakhstan, a former Soviet republic. But what his fledgling company lacked in experience, it made up for in connections. Accompanying Mr. Giustra on his luxuriously appointed MD-87 jet that day was a former president of the United States, Bill Clinton.

    Upon landing on the first stop of a three-country philanthropic tour, the two men were whisked off to share a sumptuous midnight banquet with Kazakhstan’s president, Nursultan A. Nazarbayev, whose 19-year stranglehold on the country has all but quashed political dissent.

    Mr. Nazarbayev walked away from the table with a propaganda coup, after Mr. Clinton expressed enthusiastic support for the Kazakh leader’s bid to head an international organization that monitors elections and supports democracy. Mr. Clinton’s public declaration undercut both American foreign policy and sharp criticism of Kazakhstan’s poor human rights record by, among others, Mr. Clinton’s wife, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York.

    Within two days, corporate records show that Mr. Giustra also came up a winner when his company signed preliminary agreements giving it the right to buy into three uranium projects controlled by Kazakhstan’s state-owned uranium agency, Kazatomprom. . . . .

    Just months after the Kazakh pact was finalized, Mr. Clinton’s charitable foundation received its own windfall: a $31.3 million donation from Mr. Giustra that had remained a secret until he acknowledged it last month. The gift, combined with Mr. Giustra’s more recent and public pledge to give the William J. Clinton Foundation an additional $100 million, secured Mr. Giustra a place in Mr. Clinton’s inner circle, an exclusive club of wealthy entrepreneurs in which friendship with the former president has its privileges.

Much, much more at the original. And it seems that American foreign policy regarding Kazakhstan is for sale, with the former president, and possible future first “lady,” arranging diplomatic deals that are contrary to American foreign policy — with plenty of cash trading hands.

    In a statement Kazakhstan would highlight in news releases, Mr. Clinton declared that he hoped it would achieve a top objective: leading the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, which would confer legitimacy on Mr. Nazarbayev’s government.

     

    “I think it’s time for that to happen, it’s an important step, and I’m glad you’re willing to undertake it,” Mr. Clinton said.

    Mr. Clinton’s praise was odd, given that the United States did not support Mr. Nazarbayev’s bid. (Late last year, Kazakhstan finally won the chance to lead the security organization for one year, despite concerns raised by the Bush administration.) Moreover, Mr. Clinton’s wife, who sits on a Congressional commission with oversight of such matters, had also voiced skepticism.

    Eleven months before Mr. Clinton’s statement, Mrs. Clinton co-signed a commission letter to the State Department that sounded “alarm bells” about the prospect that Kazakhstan might head the group. The letter stated that Kazakhstan’s bid “would not be acceptable,” citing “serious corruption,” canceled elections and government control of the news media.

    In a written statement to The Times, Mr. Clinton’s spokesman said the former president saw “no contradiction” between his statements in Kazakhstan and the position of Mrs. Clinton, who said through a spokeswoman, “Senator Clinton’s position on Kazakhstan remains unchanged.”

Everybody in the country was speculating on whether Senator Clinton would run for president in 2008, beginning halfway through election night in 2004, when it was obvious that John Kerry would continue to represent the fine people of Massachusetts in the United States Senate. You can’t tell me that, in 2005, Bill Clinton didn’t have a clue that his darling bride was going to run for the White House. But there he went, off to one of the less pleasant regimes in the world, to peddle influence.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://commonsensepoliticalthought.com

Editor of Common Sense Political Thought, mostly Republican (but not always), mostly conservative (but again, not always), always interesting.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
19 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Welcome Dana by Rob Kall on Sunday, Feb 3, 2008 at 7:58:24 AM
Conservatives and liberals . . . by Dana Pico on Sunday, Feb 3, 2008 at 11:15:27 AM
And I wouldn't be surprised . . . by Dana Pico on Sunday, Feb 3, 2008 at 11:18:04 AM
I am not a rightist by Mark Sashine on Sunday, Feb 3, 2008 at 9:13:21 AM
CLINTONS CLINTONS CLINTONS by RICHARD SHADE on Sunday, Feb 3, 2008 at 9:53:08 AM
Neither Clinton will ever be convicted or jailed . . . by Dana Pico on Sunday, Feb 3, 2008 at 11:21:43 AM
Clintons in Jail by lupercio on Wednesday, Feb 6, 2008 at 5:03:17 PM
Thank You by Caleb Friz on Sunday, Feb 3, 2008 at 1:25:51 PM
Thank you by lupercio on Wednesday, Feb 6, 2008 at 5:08:28 PM
No hornet's nest to stir up here by Sandy Sand on Sunday, Feb 3, 2008 at 2:43:45 PM
Funny thing about problems. by Gregory Wonderwheel on Sunday, Feb 3, 2008 at 3:15:40 PM
"Honesty" it is a two-way street by Munich on Sunday, Feb 3, 2008 at 3:20:29 PM
Quite right. by Gregory Wonderwheel on Sunday, Feb 3, 2008 at 3:24:26 PM
That would be Mr Pico! by Dana Pico on Sunday, Feb 3, 2008 at 5:08:56 PM
What did Carter do, that you didn't like? by Gregory Wonderwheel on Sunday, Feb 3, 2008 at 3:20:53 PM
President Clinton sent former President Carter . . . by Dana Pico on Sunday, Feb 3, 2008 at 5:11:35 PM
It would be pretty naive by Mark Sashine on Sunday, Feb 3, 2008 at 5:33:14 PM
Re "That would be Mr Pico!" by Munich on Sunday, Feb 3, 2008 at 7:59:22 PM
Clinton Corruption by memary on Monday, Feb 4, 2008 at 5:57:20 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum