Tags for This Article:

Health (823)  Economics (494)  Nature (325)  Ecology (49)  Biology (26)  Forests (26)  Morgan (3) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
October 21, 2007 at 08:26:45

View Ratings | Rate It

Uncommon Grace: Biology and Economic Theory

by Charles Sullivan     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

My wife, Alice, and I hold a deed to twenty acres of land in Morgan County, West Virginia. To most people, there is nothing remarkable about this place. But to us, it is extraordinary. I have spent seventeen years exploring the botany of this land: photographing its wild flowers, learning the language of its avian citizens, and capturing its various moods on film and in pixels. Knowing it as I do, I could never think of this place as a resource. It is simply home: the source. 

In a society that holds sacred the private ownership of property and economic self interest, it may seem strange that neither my wife nor I consider ourselves property owners. At best, we are squatters or temporary guardians of something that has inherent value; an evolving biological entity that exists far beyond the realm of economic self interest and monetary valuation systems. 

Alice and I share this sacred space with numerous plants and animals—most of them wild, and some of them domesticated. Among the latter: five horses, three dogs, and numerous felines. We do not own these animals any more than they own us; they are not our pets. They are simply animal companions, members of the extended human family, and valued equally with human beings, mushrooms, and copperhead snakes.

Unlike my wife and me, none of these animals have to work for a living. They are not expected to perform tricks for us. They are simply free to be who they are. We do the best we can for them with our limited resources. What we get in return is priceless; something that defies quantification. Whatever it is, it is greater than the sum of its parts but as ethereal as the morning mist that rises from a brook. Yet, it is as real as the soil and sky.

It is impossible to commodify the sacred bonds that exist between the human animal, and the non-human animal—a bond that extents into the landscape that spawned them. To claim ownership of another living being, whether wild forest, or domesticated canine, is to break the sacred bonds and reduce them into commodities—mere objects for use. It is to make them our property and force them into slavery; objects for economic exploitation.

So it is with the land itself.

In an ownership society, the land is valued not as an evolved living biological entity with inherent value and rights, including the fulfillment of its own evolutionary destiny, but as a commodity—a natural resource.

In this unnatural schema, wild forests lose their structural and biological diversity to become pulp for paper mills, and are turned into toilet paper, or packaging for ipods. Diverse forests become tree farms and plantations, monocultures thirsting for toxic chemicals to keep them alive. They are no longer natural, no longer wholly real or authentic. This process of industrial forestry moves the land from the realm of the sacred into that of economic theory; and it is falsely called science. That which has inherent value is thus devolved into mere property, a commodity; divested of its sacredness, a severed part divorced from the whole.

Treated as private property, the wild earth, with its essential ecological processes, dies a death of a thousand cuts, as economic myth and Disneyesque plantations supplant the authentic natural landscape, and the artificial is freely substituted for the real.

Surrounded by the artificial, we live in a time when people can no longer tell the difference between the real and the synthetic; the natural and the unnatural. Sadly, they do not even know what has been lost or that it can never be replaced.

Thus we have a culture which holds that economic self interest is the highest expression of human freedom. It is a paradigm that asserts its superiority over all others, including the public welfare and the wellbeing of the earth. It is the foundation of Adam Smith’s capitalism, as espoused in The Wealth of Nations, and modified many times since.

But freedom that subjugates others is not freedom at all.

Private ownership is a paradigm that values the economic parts of nature—those that can accrue wealth to the land owner, while assigning no value to the parts that are economically unimportant, or the greater public good, including the world’s genetic libraries. Yet, in nature, it is often the non-economic parts that provide the essential ecological functions that make life itself possible. Not just human life—all life.

Here in Morgan County, wild forests provide shade on hot summer afternoons, and diverse habitat for multitudes of species, both plant and animal. Together, the interrelationship formed by these species constitute a dance of life that promotes the dynamic equilibrium of a complex ecosystem—the magnificent Central Appalachian Hardwood and Mixed Mesophytic Forest.

Aided by fungus and precipitation, insects residing in decaying trees move nutrients through the earth, building healthy soil. Forests purify the air and remove pollutants, while also trapping and holding greenhouse gases. Wild forests filter pollutants from streams and rivers, providing pure drinking water to foxes, beetles, and people. All of this, and much, much, more, is provided without cost to us; as a right of citizenship in this world.

Left alone, the wild earth—unlike human constructed systems, is a beautifully self-regulating arrangement in dynamic equilibrium; a system that runs on biological capital, rather than artificial economic arrangements. The management of such systems, which have evolved over billions of years, implies the superiority of man over nature, his dominion over the earth—a dangerous and foolish notion that requires unfathomable hubris, and equal parts stupidity.

 1  |  2

 

Charles Sullivan is a photographer, social activist and free lance writer residing in the hinterland of West Virgina.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 comments

Geery lived off the grid for 15 years in an earth-sheltered, solar heated home, while his kids learned in school that solar energy isn't feasible. NAPTA hosts a page on Geery's foibles in education, and explains how he got his butt fired from a tenured teaching position. Here's a short clip of his most recent solar contraption; for more on that project, and Geery's contention that the Wright Brothers took a wrong turn, please visit his airship page (hyperblimp.com). Apparently, Geery is the only...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Daniel GeeryGeery lived off the grid for 15 years in an earth-sheltered, solar heated home, while his kids learned in school that solar energy isn't feasible. NAPTA hosts a page on Geery's foibles in education, and explains how he got his butt fired from a tenured teaching position. Here's a short clip of his most recent solar contraption; for more on that project, and Geery's contention that the Wright Brothers took a wrong turn, please visit his airship page (hyperblimp.com). Apparently, Geery is the only...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Not Man Apart

You mention David Brower, my greatest hero, who published a newsletter titled, "Not Man Apart." That title comes from a poem by Robison Jeffers:

Integrity is wholeness,
the greatest beauty is
Organic wholeness, the wholeness of life and things, the
divine beauty of the universe. Love that, not man
Apart from that...


Here is the complete poem and more on Robinson Jeffers.

And here is an article on David Brower that may be of interest to some readers.

by Daniel Geery (26 articles, 75 quicklinks, 123 diaries, 750 comments) on Sunday, October 21, 2007 at 10:21:13 AM
 


I am a 47 years old,married and have a 17 year old daughter.My hobbies are bicyling, weight training and off road motorcycling.I have lived in a midwestern red state my entire 46 years.Now that I have reached middle age I have become interested in politics and its related fields of study.I dont often think of things being either liberal or conservative,I like to veiw political events in an objective manner and find the agenda or reason that a bill or policy is brought to bear.Simply put seeking ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Gary DensonI am a 47 years old,married and have a 17 year old daughter.My hobbies are bicyling, weight training and off road motorcycling.I have lived in a midwestern red state my entire 46 years.Now that I have reached middle age I have become interested in politics and its related fields of study.I dont often think of things being either liberal or conservative,I like to veiw political events in an objective manner and find the agenda or reason that a bill or policy is brought to bear.Simply put seeking ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Outdated economic theory

Very nice article!

Lately Adam Smith has been chosen to justify free trade and basically every greedy scheme business interests choose to pursue. His opinions, usually taken out of context, has been promoted as an absolute truth. People need to remember he lived well over 200 years ago and that the world has changed dramatically. Man has made many advances since then, just look at how much the practice of medicine has changed. Why would anyone expect his work to still be state of the art?            I will tell you why, its been hijacked to promote corporate greed and poor trade agreements.

by Gary Denson (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 262 comments) on Sunday, October 21, 2007 at 3:39:57 PM
 


57Yo m I'm a "been there, done that! Bought the tee shirt,to hide the scars!" type of person Ive worked�many jobs from�a chicken slaughterer to managing a branch of a multinational and many jobs in between.Raised in colonial PNG Left School 16,Grad Hi school 22 Night School, University 36� BBus (majored in Psyche and Marketing), Dip Comp prog and project Mmnt.at 50 I've been in 48 different community org ,23 on board with 18 prez or deputy prez.First social campaign at 17 for the aborigine...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Andris57Yo m I'm a "been there, done that! Bought the tee shirt,to hide the scars!" type of person Ive worked�many jobs from�a chicken slaughterer to managing a branch of a multinational and many jobs in between.Raised in colonial PNG Left School 16,Grad Hi school 22 Night School, University 36� BBus (majored in Psyche and Marketing), Dip Comp prog and project Mmnt.at 50 I've been in 48 different community org ,23 on board with 18 prez or deputy prez.First social campaign at 17 for the aborigine...

to see more of bio, click on member name

All Economic theories are only that- Theories not absolute

My point exactly in a number of comments I’ve written. I’ve also pointed out that Adam Smith was a contempary of many of the US’s founding fathers. There are sources that suggest that he had contact with at least two Franklin and Jefferson.

Either way they were aware of and were influenced by his work, intended to improve the lot of people (high ideals as opposed today that self inerest and exploitive profit is paramount). As you rightly say his thoughts were in a pre industrial, pre Conglomerate, corporate ‘legal identity’ (shelter) for business.  

Neither he nor the founding fathers could have conceived/comprehended even in the remotest sense what corporate capitalism has done to his base theories or their noble intentions.

 History is now and has always been in a context of its time and circumstance. Therefore neither is history a supermarket from which we can choose items rejecting others. Sure we need to learn the lessons of the past “lest we are doomed to repeat it” but we need to make allowances for the context.

 In the final analysis Philosophies can never be (because of context and the scope of differences in humans) an end in its self. Neither can it be a means to an end any more than a screw driver defines a mechanic or his work…..it is simply a tool. I have a theory that all unqualified ‘ism’ (i.e. capitalism) should be in a book called “sausage conclusions for dummies” or “ lazy thinking for idiots”.

by Andris (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 531 comments) on Sunday, October 21, 2007 at 5:51:56 PM
 


57Yo m I'm a "been there, done that! Bought the tee shirt,to hide the scars!" type of person Ive worked�many jobs from�a chicken slaughterer to managing a branch of a multinational and many jobs in between.Raised in colonial PNG Left School 16,Grad Hi school 22 Night School, University 36� BBus (majored in Psyche and Marketing), Dip Comp prog and project Mmnt.at 50 I've been in 48 different community org ,23 on board with 18 prez or deputy prez.First social campaign at 17 for the aborigine...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Andris57Yo m I'm a "been there, done that! Bought the tee shirt,to hide the scars!" type of person Ive worked�many jobs from�a chicken slaughterer to managing a branch of a multinational and many jobs in between.Raised in colonial PNG Left School 16,Grad Hi school 22 Night School, University 36� BBus (majored in Psyche and Marketing), Dip Comp prog and project Mmnt.at 50 I've been in 48 different community org ,23 on board with 18 prez or deputy prez.First social campaign at 17 for the aborigine...

to see more of bio, click on member name

At last someone seems to understand

 Your article literally brought a tear of homesickness to me.

Your article is close to the philosophies of most indigenous people of Australia and Melanesia.

I remember this from New Guinea, I am also saddened that the disintegration of the cultures  there as well, all because of the  disconnectedness that we whites and the greed of the Asians have imposed. As a consequence of this breakdown I can’t go 'home' even for a visit…it’s too dangerous.

There is a book that is worth the effort to find it’s  easy to read fascinating, entertaining and its subtext is about the arrogance of white men and their ownership culture. By Tim Flannery “Throwim Way Leg” it means going for a long walk.

 Flannery is well know in Australia not only as a scientist but also for his books and stand on Global warming. He is the 'Australian of the year 2007'

by Andris (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 531 comments) on Sunday, October 21, 2007 at 5:06:18 PM
 


customer service flunky for a major insurance company. Have 2 Master's degrees, have studied abroad, and like many of my generation (Gen X) are underpaid and underemployed for our levels of education compared to previous generations. Scraping by while looking for my ideal career.
Johncustomer service flunky for a major insurance company. Have 2 Master's degrees, have studied abroad, and like many of my generation (Gen X) are underpaid and underemployed for our levels of education compared to previous generations. Scraping by while looking for my ideal career.

good article, thanks. Read any James Howard Kunstler?

I'm a regular reader of Jim Kunstler's CLUSTERF*CK NATION blog over at http://www.kunstler.com and your comment on 'Disneyesque "plantations"..' resonates a lot with what he writes on his blog and in his book THE LONG EMERGENCY. 

see also http://dieoff.org , especially the Economics section.

It's out of print now, but I really enjoyed the book ADAM SMITH's MISTAKE (1990) by Kenneth Lux and Mark Lutz.

Besides, Adam Smith these days couldn't get a job with the Wall Street Journal if he wanted to--he'd be considered "too Lefty".

responding to the commentator above:

Neither he nor the founding fathers could have conceived/comprehended even in the remotest sense what corporate capitalism has done to his base theories or their noble intentions.

Not quite true.  Thomas Jefferson railed against what were then known as "moneyed incorporations", forerunners of modern corporations.  He understood the implications and did not like what he saw.  Abraham Lincoln also has some quotes regarding the growth of corporate power over the lives of American citizens that can only be described as "prescient"...he saw the writing on the wall.  As did Dwight Eisenhower, touching on the "military-industrial complex" in his farewell address.

Capitalism is dependent on an assumption of infinite growth. Infinite growth on a finite planet is a physical impossibility...it's a delusion, in fact, and a quite deadly one.  To be truly ecological is ipso-facto to be anticapitalist.  "Green Capitalism" is smoke-and-mirrors self-delusion.

As Ed Abbey also said: "Growth for Growth's sake is the ideology of the cancer cell".

We call it AgriCULTURE for a reason.  AgriCULTURE in this country was almost wiped out and replaced by AgriBUSINESS, but honest AgriCULTURE is making a small but fighting comeback.  It has to, or else we're doomed.

 

by John (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 17 comments) on Monday, October 22, 2007 at 12:28:46 AM
 


KEVIN STODA has been blessed to have either traveled in or worked in nearly 100 countries on five continents over the past two and a half decades.  He sees himself as a peace educator and have been   a promoter of good economic and social development--making him an enemy of my homelands humongous spending and its focus on using weapons to try and solve global issues."I am from Kansas so I also use the pseudonym 'Kansas' when I write and publish.  I...

to see more of bio, click on member name

ALONEKEVIN STODA has been blessed to have either traveled in or worked in nearly 100 countries on five continents over the past two and a half decades.  He sees himself as a peace educator and have been   a promoter of good economic and social development--making him an enemy of my homelands humongous spending and its focus on using weapons to try and solve global issues."I am from Kansas so I also use the pseudonym 'Kansas' when I write and publish.  I...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Patience, fairness and the human condition

I was reading last weekend, "Patience, Fairness and the Human Condition" in the Economist at http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9898270

I think there is a paradox in the fact the author has to own the property to protect it.  Another ciritque below reminds one that both ecology and economics are theoretical framework.  This artice on how economic maximizers are in the ape kingdom while in the human domain there is a gene programmed orientation for fairness.  The deeper question, therefore, is "IF people are programmed by genes and nature to demand fairness in the system, how has it gotten so out of wack?"  The obvious answer must be in the education and propaganda paradigms blinding man to his own sense of fairness in approaching planet earth--as biology has programmed him to do.

by ALONE (152 articles, 1 quicklinks, 4 diaries, 337 comments) on Wednesday, October 24, 2007 at 2:47:09 PM
 

 

6 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

NEW IDEAS ON RESTORING U. S. ECONOMY, for the Next Secretary of Commerce, William Blaine Richardson III by Stephen Fox

Detroit vs. Wall Street: The Trillion Dollar Class War by Cameron Salisbury

Saving the Big 3 for You and Me ...a message from Michael Moore by Michael Moore

SO SAY THE BANKERS: Learn to Love the 'AMERO' by Patrick Henningsen

No Bailout Oversight: Bush Stalls Inspector General Selection by Allen L Roland

Young inexperienced doctors learn the Culture of Dishonesty at the VA by Warren Wells

Credit Card Crisis Is Here / Derivatives Next by Allen L Roland

Paulson shoots another arrow into the heart of the Economy by Andrew Hughes

Odetta Sings Her First Song, from Way Up Above Us by muservin

Woody Guthrie: A little recession music, please by Mickey Z.

Go To Top 50 Most Popular