Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (1 comment)

Iran Sanctions a bad idea for Troops in Iraq? Or just bad in General?

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

I understand thoroughly why the U.S. and other countries are against Iran developing nuclear power plants. There is a great fear that Iran will do what we did, which is use our enriched uranium to create nuclear weapons. I do think it is extremely hypocritical for nuclear powered countries to deny other countries the right to technologies we already use. In any case, Iran is an extremist nation and that can make anyone a little edgy about their nuclear prospects.

There are much more effective ways to controlling Iran's nuclear ambitions than through sanctions. Sanctions are horrible as a policy; they usually aim to punish a countries administration and in the end serve only to hurt the middle class population. These sanctions are also going to help further incite Shiite participation in the insurgency in Iraq. Muqtada al-Sadr has already expressly stated, "If neighbouring Islamic countries, including Iran, become the target of attacks, we will support them". How do we know he will not view these sanctions as an act of war?

Sanctioning Iran while we have a massive amount of troops in Iraq is a bad policy. We are flicking matches at a can of gasoline, and eventually it is going to ignite. It could be by the inflammation of Shiite parties in Iraq, such as al-Sadr's Mahdi Army, or just a general uprising in the insurgency, but anyway it happens, U.S. troops will be suffering as a result.

Why are we not taking a stance similar to what we took with North Korea when they expressed their nuclear ambitions? We should be examining the possibilities of supplying Iran with light water nuclear reactors, just as was planned with North Korea. Of course there would be stipulations, such as IAEA oversight and abiding by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty of which they have already signed on.

Due to the quagmire in Iraq (which we solely caused), we need to treat Iran with kid gloves. Sanctions are not kid gloves. Many studies show that the sanctions in Iraq only hurt the middle class civilians and had nothing to do with damaging the countries leaders. The only conclusion I can draw is that we are taking a childish, lackadaisical response to the threat of a nuclear Iran, where a military option isn't necessary or arguably even available.

Sanctions are unsound policy and they are not going to stop Iran. Iran is not going to just sit down and accept these sanctions. They are only going to further incite an insurgency in Iraq and further tighten tensions with Iran. Use the original North Korea model, except this time lets do it right by trying not to further alienate the country that is on the verge of creating nuclear weapons. We will supply the technology of the light water nuclear reactors, all financed by Iran. The IAEA will provide over watch of the facilities. We have to come to a compromise. There is no more Sunni Iraq able to keep Shiite Iran at a stalemate.

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Oppose Iran Sanctions -- push for REAL policy!

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Chuck no longer actively writes.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Religion? by "Hoss" David P. on Wednesday, Dec 27, 2006 at 7:26:33 PM