![]() |
|
Tags for This Article:
Impeachment (2998) Congress (2721) Peace (1248) Corporations (775) 2006 Congressional Elections (368) Congress Legislative Failures (151)
|
Add to My Group
We who want peace number in the millions- we are a majority, if the last election is any clue. We march, lobby Congress, get ourselves arrested, sign petitions, blog, blog, blog, and it seems fruitless. We elect a Democratic Congress, and they seem powerless to stop the war machine, or unwilling, or downright complicit. The House of Representatives has the power to impeach the president and vice president. The House holds the purse strings and could simply refuse to fund illegal military operations. Yet it refuses to do either. The conventional wisdom of American politics nowadays is that it takes lots of money to buy the media coverage to get known enough to win elections. The money comes from the corporations that profit from war, directly or indirectly. And so candidates sell out to the war machine, in order to get elected. When they get elected, they vote for war funding, in order to fulfill agreements made with their campaign funders, and in order to ensure re-election. Many in the peace movement understand this, and so have given up on electoral politics. What with gerrymandering, corrupt voting machines, and numerous dirty tricks to exclude progressive voters, going the political route seems like an exercise in futility. Add in the fact that the Democratic party has a tight grip on its members in Congress, and refuses to allow the impeachment of Bush and Cheney despite their many obvious crimes, and it seems even more hopeless. Ballot access, debates, money are all stacked against third party and independent candidates. On the other hand, all members of the House are up for re-election in 2008. Their voting records are public. All we have to do is target the ones who have consistently voted for war funding and refused to vote for impeachment. Targeting them means running good candidates against them, building a solid organization, and doing the hard work of collecting signatures, raising money, generating publicity, etc. Cindy Sheehan's challenge to Nancy Pelosi is a good example. People around the country are gearing up to run for Congress. Some of us have already come together in the New Broom Coalition http://newbroomcoalition.org, which crosses party lines. We include Democrats, Greens, independents, and Republicans. We're hoping to have candidates in every Congressional district whose incumbent is not actively working for impeachment of the war criminals in the White House. We know the next president will also be a warmonger. Both parties are tied into the war machine, and they will not allow "outsiders", like Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul, to get a fair hearing. So our only way to get out of Iraq is by getting enough peace candidates elected to the House to block funding. We need to continue with lobbying, demonstrations, sit-ins, everything we can do. But now, much of our effort should go into the Congressional races. If we focus and coordinate our efforts, we can succeed. Peace now! Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people: Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTowK03sr7Q Carol S. Wolman, MD is a psychiatrist in Northern California. A lifelong peace activist, she has written extensively on the psychology of our times. She is a cochair of Bay Area Impeach Bush-Cheney. You can join or form a local group at http://impeachbush.meetup.com/
She ran for Congress in '06, and is now a Gteen candidate for Congress in CA district 1. She is a coordinator of The New Broom Coalition, for a clean sweep of Congress.
Real peace movement One issue is the confusion of opposition to one particular war (Iraq now) with being for peace. Taint necessarily so. Barack Obama made that clear at the time of the beginning of the Iraq War, when he was careful to state that war in Iraq would be stupid but that he was not for peace. Unfortunately, the peace movement at this time is depressingly small, about as small as I can remember it, and I'm 60. There is little challenging of the fundamental assumptions of the war system. I remember, for instance, when there were votes in Congress every year on whether to shift funds from the military to human needs. Hasn't happened in years. Last year, the Senate voted unanimously for the precise military budget figure Bush proposed, and only a handful of House members opposed it. The top tier of Democratic Presidential candidates all favor a larger military budget, not a shift to human needs. I do realize the Mission Statement of the New Broom Coalition is somewhat broader than opposition to the Iraq War, although the article itself was not very clear. But IMHO we need to concentrate on opposing future wars more than on the present ones. Unless we undermine the war and oppression system, we will always be involved in a reactionary anti-war posture. by
Bill Samuel (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 193 comments)
on Friday, December 7, 2007 at 5:26:05 PM
A suggestion? You want to clean sweep congress--I'd like to suggest including in your "throw the bums out" criteria that you add "Voted for the Patriot Act" to the list. That would clear our most members of congress. In the presidential election, only vote for those candidates that voted against the Patriot Act as well: Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich. by
Dooglio (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 30 comments)
on Monday, December 10, 2007 at 7:01:35 PM
|