Tag(s): ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (29 comments)

Masterminds of 9-11- IMPEACH THEM!

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (1 fan)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

As I work for impeachment, I wonder what it would take to get people angry enough to put it on the table. I keep coming back to 9-11, the basis for the "war on terror". The "war on terror" is in turn is the rationale for Afghanistan, Iraq, fascism, the looting of the Treasury, and many other ills. 9-11 was Bush's "trifecta" as he put it, the triple crown that would make him emperor.

If people understood that 9-11 was a criminal conspiracy, a lethal hoax orchestrated by Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld, the outrage would be great enough to force Congress to impeach.

If we examine what each man was doing that day, one must conclude that they were all part of a plot to stage a "false flag" operation, to lay the groundwork for the rest of their evil plans. If 3000 people had to die,- oh well, you can't make an omelet without breaking eggs.

Bush, the pResident, target #1, the Decider, was not surprised. So he must have had prior knowledge. He was sitting unprotected in an elementary school classroom, reading "My pet goat", and went on doing that for 30 minutes after being told "we're under attack". Evidently the Secret Service was not worried about his safety, so they knew it wasn't an enemy attack. Evidently Bush didn't feel the need to take command, get on the phone to NORAD and assess the situation, scramble fighter jets to intercept the other 3 planes, which were quickly identified as being off course... The Commander-in-Chief was either derelict in his duty or in on the plot. Either way, he should be impeached.

Dick Cheney, the Vice pResident, was in the Situation Room of the White House, monitoring a CIA simulation of planes crashing into buildings "by a bizarre coincidence". The Pentagon was also conducting several live-fly hijacking exercises that day, so the sky was full of pilots playing war games. Probably Cheney was orchestrating all of these plus the four planes that were part of the 9-11 "attack". Certainly Cheney, sitting in the Situation Room, was in a position to see the hijackers and intervene, and didn't. So he's either derelict in his duty, or the mastermind. Certainly impeachable, either way.

Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, was sitting in his office in the Pentagon, on the side away from the "attack", which occurred AFTER both towers were hit. When the Pentagon was struck, he sauntered out, and claimed that he had no idea what was going on! No one called the Secretary of Defense? Especially since on June 1, 2001, just 3 months earlier, he had had the rules about scrambling fighter jets changed, in such a way that no interceptions could take place without HIS PERSONAL APPROVAL! And no one tried to reach him? Or he was unreachable? Either he was derelict or part of the plot. Either way, it's criminal.

All three of these men were responsible for defending the US from enemy attack, and utterly failed to do so. In the Navy, a captain who loses a ship is automatically court-martialled. Shouldn't these three men be subjected to a military tribunal, to account for losing three buildings, 3000 lives, and part of the Pentagon? For their failure to take appropriate countermeasures?

How likely is it that all three of these key people were derelict? Isn't it much more likely that they were conspiring together? Why won't our elected Representatives in Congress IMPEACH THEM?

In the name of the God of truth,

Carol Wolman

 

Carol S. Wolman, MD is a psychiatrist in Northern California. A lifelong peace activist, she is helping to distribute a Peace Plan for the Holy Land- email her for a copy. As the Green candidate for Congress in California District 1 in '08, she (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
29 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

only 9/11 truth can end the wars! by media monarchy on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 11:15:59 AM
Always Amazed by Mr M on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 12:12:19 PM
I don't disagree, but think 9-11 should not be the main by Richard Mynick on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 12:39:28 PM
IMPEACH THE TERRORISTS! by mrk * on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 1:38:26 PM
thanks ++ by namzezam on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 2:24:07 PM
But Carol by ardee D. on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 4:38:59 PM
Right on Carol! by John Perry on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 5:12:25 PM
Continue to occupy legislative offices by Sleeper on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 6:03:36 PM
Impeachment is out of the question. by Steve on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 6:50:57 PM
9/11 by Henry Dreher on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 7:51:56 PM
CAROL... by Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 8:45:23 PM
CAROL... by Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 8:45:27 PM
Carol . . . by Dusty Nathan on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 9:00:51 PM
A lot of good points by Peter Dearman on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 10:16:00 PM
Interesting air traffic controller interview: by johndoraemi on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 10:27:05 PM
What 9/11 hijackers? by meremark on Friday, Feb 23, 2007 at 7:57:51 PM
Making claims you can't back up. by johndoraemi on Saturday, Feb 24, 2007 at 9:43:27 PM
IMPEACHMENT by Halo on Friday, Feb 23, 2007 at 1:11:40 AM
YOU HAVE GOT TO BE f*cking sh*tting ME!!! by Re'flexion on Friday, Feb 23, 2007 at 2:33:28 AM
Well, *THAT* was rather revealing.... by richard on Friday, Feb 23, 2007 at 5:55:07 AM
Of Course You Are Right About by richard on Friday, Feb 23, 2007 at 7:08:45 AM
all the way back to Woodrow Wilson? by Carol Wolman on Friday, Feb 23, 2007 at 10:18:00 AM
Carol: Yes, W.Wilson is at the very beginning. by meremark on Friday, Feb 23, 2007 at 8:29:23 PM
Separating the men from the boys by John Perry on Friday, Feb 23, 2007 at 7:21:09 AM
Zacko's comments by JacksonHolly on Friday, Feb 23, 2007 at 8:47:18 AM
Zack's anger comes from his small genital-&-brain by Richard Mynick on Friday, Feb 23, 2007 at 9:51:52 AM
Whoa Dude by ardee D. on Friday, Feb 23, 2007 at 10:11:55 AM
Much deeper than 9/11 by J Martin on Friday, Feb 23, 2007 at 6:10:54 AM
Sorry, J. Martin, by richard on Friday, Feb 23, 2007 at 7:11:23 AM