Tag(s): ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (3 comments)

Senate Control Should NEVER Change Hands by a Governor Disregarding The Will Of His People

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (2 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

As these words are written it appears that Senator Johnson is doing well with the real prospect of a full recovery. As we hope and pray for the best, it is time to take stock of the potential for the next two years becoming an ongoing constitutional crisis in the U.S. Senate.

With the Senate virtually evenly divided, there is the real prospect of a series of health issues, acts of God, accidents of fate, creating the near permanent possibility that control of the Senate could shift back and forth, more than once.

Let me propose a rule, and the procedures to implement the rule, that should apply to both political parties and governors of every state.

The rule: if something happens to a Senator who for whatever reason leaves office, and is replaced by the Governor of the state, the Governor should appoint a successor from the same political party. Period.

The procedure: the National Governors Association should formally call on all Governors, from all states, regardless of party, to publicly commit themselves to honor this rule and ALWAYS appoint a successor from the same party, as the former Senator.

The reason is simple and crystal clear: if the voters have elected a United States Senator, for a Governor to appoint a successor from the other political party is a dishonor to the voters of that state, a direct attack on the democratic process in that State, and a partisan violation of the integrity and honor of the democratic system.

In the case of South Dakota, the voters of South Dakota have elected the Democrat, Senator Johnson, while the voters of America have elected the Democrats, to control the Senate.

For a Republican Governor to appoint a Republican Senator to that seat would be an aggressive dishonor of what the voters of South Dakota and America have decided in our democratic elections.

I would add, the exact same abuse would occur if a Republican Senator from another State, ultimately has to be replaced by a Democratic Governor, and the Democratic governor named a Democrat also in violation of the will of the voters of that State.

In my opinion, any governor who committed such an abuse should be defeated for reelection, and if state law includes a recall procedure, should be recalled and removed.

America is fed up with partisan politics.

America is fed up with the "win at any cost" attitude that has corrupted our electoral process.

America is fed up with the abuses of the democratic process that have become a way of life, for far too long.

Americans have voted in 2006 for an end to this petty partisan corruption and these abuses of democratic values.

With the stakes so high, control of either House of Congress should NEVER, never change hands because of a partisan governor abusing, ignoring, and showing contempt for the voters of his, or her, state. If the voters elected a Democrat, the governor should appoint a Democrat as successor. If the voters elected a Republican, the governor should appoint a Republican as successor.

I predict: if any governor ever violates this standard, and control of Congress changes because of this naked partisan violation, the voters of that state would soon end the political career of that governor, and they should.

Let us hope and pray that Senator Johnson makes a full and complete recovery and that every Senator, from both parties, serves out their term in good health.

But let us also be determined that this issue, if necessary, is worthy of a hard and aggressive fight if any governor violates the will of the people, fails to respect their vote, and tries a partisan power play that would be the kind of attack on our democracy that the voters of America have spoken loudly, and clearly, against.

Brent Budowsky

 

Brent Budowsky is a regular columnist on thehill.com. He served as Legislative Assistant to U.S. Senator Lloyd Bentsen, responsible for commerce and intelligence matters, including one (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Errrr no actually by ardee D. on Friday, Dec 15, 2006 at 10:13:03 AM
Another idea..... by larry booth on Sunday, Dec 17, 2006 at 11:40:52 PM
I agree by kpominville on Monday, Dec 18, 2006 at 5:01:47 PM