I've just started with my own personal "whip count" on votes that Russ Feingold (D-WI) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) can bank on if they need to bring to the Senate floor their proposed legislation that would cut off money for continuing the disastrous Iraq war.
Some of my Progressive colleagues say that it's premature and bad strategy to be discussing this option before Bush even vetoes the supplemental bill. I would respectfully disagree and submit that the scenario that spawned the Feingold-Reid measure is far from hypothetical and almost a certainty.
There's no question that Bush will veto the supplemental funding bill because it contains the Iraq-withdrawal provision he despises so much. The fact that it also contains the money he needs for the troops doesn't matter to Bush. Likewise, there's no doubt in my mind that Reid will bring the bill that forces Bush out of Iraq in a year (by cutting off war funding) to the Senate for a vote shortly thereafter.
So where do we stand on support for Feingold-Reid? Well, let's just say that it's a good thing I didn't expect too much, too soon.
Granted, Senators are on their one-week recess and I understand that, far from the vacation many people think they take during this time, a good part of it is spent roaming their home states and listening to constituents. In addition, some Senate offices are staffed with skeleton crews during the recess and an eager political writer looking for a statement on upcoming legislation may have to cool his heels, show a bit of damn patience and wait a week or so.
Legislation can also be very complicated and some of it is so lengthy and contains so many twists and turns that you can suffer from a dizzying combination of boredom and motion sickness just reading it.
I understand all of that.
But the Feingold-Reid legislation is 187 words. That's it. I've read movie descriptions on DVD jackets longer than that. In addition, the words that are there hardly require a parliamentarian for deciphering. I'm not kidding -- here's the entire bill:
(a) Transition of Mission - The President shall promptly transition the mission of United States forces in Iraq to the limited purposes set forth in subsection (d).
(b) Commencement of Safe, Phased Redeployment from Iraq - The President shall commence the safe, phased redeployment of United States forces from Iraq that are not essential to the purposes set forth in subsection (d). Such redeployment shall begin not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(c) Prohibition on Use of Funds - No funds appropriated or otherwise made available under any provision of law may be obligated or expended to continue the deployment in Iraq of members of the United States Armed Forces after March 31, 2008.
(d) Exception for Limited Purposes - The prohibition under subsection (c) shall not apply to the obligation or expenditure of funds for the limited purposes as follows:
(1) To conduct targeted operations, limited in duration and scope, against members of al Qaeda and other international terrorist organizations.
(2) To provide security for United States infrastructure and personnel.
(3) To train and equip Iraqi security services.
Don't bother Googling for more. That's the whole thing.
So I've been hitting up the press offices of Senate Democrats, Independent Bernie Sanders and Republicans Chuck Hagel and Gordon Smith -- the latter two voted for the supplemental with the withdrawal provision -- to see where people stand on Feingold-Reid and have waited to see what kind of results I would get in the first two days.
Vermont's stalwart Independent, Bernie Sanders, who caucuses with the Democrats, stepped right up to the plate and I quickly heard back from Sanders' Communications Director, Erin Campbell:
Senator Bernie Sanders said, "I strongly support the legislation proposed by Senator Reid and Senator Feingold to bring an end to U.S. involvement in the war in Iraq. By setting a concrete timeline to stop funding for the war, this legislation sends a strong message to the President that he cannot simply continue to follow the same failed policies. Since this President has refused to recognize the reality of the situation in Iraq, it is up to Congress to put and end to the war and bring our troops home. This legislation is an important step in that direction."
Some were not quite as straightforward -- and not incredibly hopeful -- but at least acknowledged that they were familiar with the legislation.
OMG when will some of you die heard Liberal Day Dreams stop having your own Democrat Wet Dream Fanasty about "How an idiotic Non-Binding Phony Resolution on Funds for Bush and Cheney's War in Iraq will work BS," will you and get your Democrat or Looney Toons Liberal Arses Back In Touch With Reality Again Here Will You? The only thing that will stop Bush and Cheney Insane War In Iraq IS IMPEACHMENT OF BOTH WHINER IN CHIEF GEORGE W BUSH AND VICE LIAR DRAFT DODGER DICK CHENEY AND THROWING THAT TRAITOR AND SELF APPOINTED CO-PRESIDENT IDIOT LOONEY TOONS MADAME NANCY PELOSI OUT OF CONGRESS FIRST!
by
Ralph (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 74 comments)
on Friday, April 6, 2007 at 2:06:46 PM
I don't often reply to comments but I heard you were dogging me all over the place and, after seeing your comments and writing style I'm quite concerned. Ralph, please, for the sake of yourself and your family, please get help. And then make a promise to everyone on this web site that you will faithfully take your medication before you touch your computer.
I know the thorazine will make you drowsy, but you'll at least be more calm.
Please, Ralph. I care.
by
Bob Geiger (76 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 3 comments)
on Friday, April 6, 2007 at 2:52:50 PM
2 comments
How would you rate this?
You must be logged in (if signed up) to do ratings.
It's free to signup! And easy. And takes just a minute or two....
I've just started with my own personal "whip count" on votes that Russ Feingold (D-WI) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) can bank on if they need to bring to the Senate floor their proposed legislation that would cut off money for continuing the disastrous Iraq war.
Must Read (
Well Said (
News (
Touching (
Funny (
Supported (
Interesting (
Inspiring (
Valuable (
