As the primary season grinds to a close, many Democrats expect a decisive victory in the November general election and look forward to four years of a Democratic President working with a partisan Congress. What isn't being discussed is the possible end of the conservative era. The smashing defeat of John McCain and the Republican Party should signal Americans reject the inept conservative ideology that's dominated U.S. politics for twenty-eight years.
Since the Reagan Presidency, four pillars of American conservative ideology have controlled political discourse. The first is the idea America is best protected by a gargantuan military. Conservatives have contended that to keep the U.S. safe we must have the world's biggest defense establishment. This notion reached its apotheosis at the end of the Reagan era when the US won the arms race with the Soviet Union, ending the Cold War.
After 1990, conservatives insisted U.S. military expenditures should remain enormous, citing first the risk from "rogue states" and more recently the threat of terrorism. The fallacy of this position became clear during the George W. Bush Administration: having the world's largest military didn't protect the U.S. on 9/11; conventional military action didn't bring the terrorist perpetrators to justice; and an exclusively military operation in Iraq didn't produce stability and democracy.
The past seven years revealed the conservative illusion of protecting America exclusively by a mammoth military has two logical flaws: In the modern world no problem can be solved by an exclusively military response. And, it makes no sense for conservatives to insist on a small, well managed Federal government while maintaining our humongous military establishment be run with no performance expectations. Yet, Republican Presidential nominee McCain advocates the same inept conservative military strategy.
The second pillar of conservative ideology is the promise of small government. Since the Reagan Presidency, conservatives have contended the Federal government needs to be decreased by professional managers. In practice, they have reduced governmental oversight – causing problems such as the recent credit crisis – and filled the vast Federal bureaucracy with incompetent political appointments such as Michael Brown and Donald Rumsfeld. John McCain promises to continue the dysfunctional conservative practices that decrease the effectiveness and integrity of Federal programs.
The third pillar of conservatism is tax reduction. Beginning with the Reagan era, conservatives have argued much of the Federal government is a waste of money and, therefore, American shouldn't have to pay for it. As a result, the marginal tax rates for individuals and corporations were diminished until today they are roughly half of what they were in 1980. However, while Federal revenues diminished, expenditures surged because of the growth of the military establishment and the reality Americans rely upon Federal services. During the Bush Administration the Federal budget deficit grew to the point where it became a serious impediment to U.S. economic growth. Nonetheless, John McCain continues to advocate lower taxes for the rich and powerful.
The fourth pillar of conservatism is the promise of competent management. Ronald Reagan recognized that when Americans have confidence in their leaders, particularly the President, they are optimistic about the future, which is good for the economy. But after eight years of George W. Bush, Americans no longer have faith in their Republican leaders. 82 percent of Americans believe the US is headed in the wrong direction and two-thirds feel it's Bush's fault.
For the past twenty-eight years, conservatives have argued that while Democrats are "social engineers" who only know how to lash together ineffective Federal social programs, Republicans are "professional managers" who know how to run government like a business. Eight years of George W. Bush, the first "CEO president," have proven this to be a lie. Furthermore, Senator McCain's candidacy is not run by professional managers, but rather by corporate lobbyists.
John McCain's presidential campaign is based upon a single premise: "I'm well prepared to continue the Bush era." Despite his unearned reputation as a maverick, McCain is a rock-ribbed conservative who advocates the same flawed ideology that has driven every Republican administration since Reagan: a bloated military establishment, a neutered Federal bureaucracy, lower taxes for the rich and powerful, and incompetent management.
If McCain is defeated, what Democratic ideology will replace the vacuum created by the failure of conservatism? Hopefully, one that favors a smaller, more flexible military coupled with diplomatic initiatives to effectively fight the war on terrorism. Domestically, this should be paired with a smaller, more effective government tailored to meet the needs of working families and provide the oversight required to protect all Americans. To balance the budget, and help get the economy back on track, Democrats should emphasize equitable taxation – a system where everyone pays their fair share.
None of this will be possible without competent management. For the past twenty-eight years, Republicans have substituted ideological dogmatism for managerial expertise. They've focused on amassing power rather than on governing America for the best interests of all the people. Beginning in January 2009, Democrats should have the opportunity to reverse the savage legacy of conservatism and turn America in a positive direction.
Bob Burnett is a Berkeley writer and Quaker actvist. He is particularly interested in progressive morality and writes frequently on the ethical aspects of political and social issues.
The writer is deceived by Democratic rhetoric. Look how they vote--billions for the military and war. The betrayal of 2006 is a good clue. Follow the money trail.
by
philip rosen (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 93 comments)
on Saturday, May 24, 2008 at 10:38:50 AM
Phillip., what the author said was that an overwhelming Democratic victory would signal the rejection of the blatantly false neo-conservative idelology that has brought the United State's position in the world to the ground, and threatens to bury us. Nikita Kruschev cold not have devised a more effective weapon aginst the US than the modern Republican party.
But don't confuse Democrats with progressives. Half of the Democratic Party is an extension of the Republican Party, and the other half is marginalized and ineffective. Until the Democratic leadership is consigned to the same dustbin that the neo-cons belong in, nothing will change. Taxes on the rich aren't going to go back up, military expenditures will not be reduced, the plight of the poor in the US will not improve, and the world will suffer as much under a neo-liberal Democratic presidency as a Republican one.
A pox on all of them.
by
Wayne Turner (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 38 comments)
on Saturday, May 24, 2008 at 12:30:46 PM
Crooks are never conservatives. They are radicals.
Whether Communist, Nazi, Mafia or military, they only believe in force and fraud. Everything the do is theft. Conservationists are conservative. The Civil Liberties Union is conservative.
by
John Hanks (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1094 comments)
on Sunday, May 25, 2008 at 8:32:52 AM
The Republican Party is no longer made up of conservatives who are fiscally responsible, but rather neo (new) conservatives who spend and spend to control the world.
That is why real conservatives will NEVER vote for McCain. If a Democrat ever thinks for a moment that Clinton is anything other than McCain with a D after her name, they are sorely mistaken. Just look at her voting record for proof.
by
Deborah Wells (0 articles, 1 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 34 comments)
on Sunday, May 25, 2008 at 8:47:25 PM
