Tags for This Article:

Bush GW (2264)  War -Antiwar (1869)  Republicans-GOP (1338)  Terrorists-Terrorism (1022)  Leadership- Leaders (355) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
March 7, 2006 at 05:29:07

View Ratings | Rate It

Remembering Winston Churchill

by Bob Burnett     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

Sunday marked the 60th anniversary of Winston Churchill’s famous speech at Westminster College in Fulton, Missouri. In this address, Churchill coined the phrase, “iron curtain,” and foresaw the Cold War that would consume much of the free world’s attention for the next forty years. If Churchill were alive today, undoubtedly he would deliver another stirring oration warning of the desperate circumstances we find ourselves in—the prospect of global Jihad.

On March 5th, 1946, Churchill reminded his audience that he’d tried to prevent World War II. “Last time I saw it all coming and I cried aloud to my own fellow-countrymen and to the world, but no one paid any attention.” He remembered, “There never was a war in history easier to prevent by timely action than the one which has just desolated such great areas of the globe. It could have been prevented in my belief without the firing of a single shot, and Germany might be powerful, prosperous and honored today; but no one would listen and one by one we were all sucked into the awful whirlpool.”



Now we teeter at the edge of another whirlpool, stirred by religious extremism. A vortex that swirls faster every day because of the preaching of radical Islam, Judaism, and Christianity. Each of the great desert religions has a fanatical segment that while seeking to bring proselytes closer to God condemns unbelievers to eternal damnation.

Few of us believe that the global war looming before us may be prevented “without the firing of a single shot.” Nonetheless, we can keep it from spreading throughout the world. It is still possible to step away from the abyss.

For a time, after 9/11, the whole world was on the side of the United States. Some thought that the savagery of the attacks had proven, once and for all, the need for global community. Citizens in every country wanted to help America track down Osama bin Laden and the Al Qaeda assassins. We united to hunt them down in Afghanistan.

The coalition failed for three reasons. It quickly became clear that the US—the Bush Administration—insisted on running the operation, not a loosely structured international military command or the United Nations. Moreover, in the days that stretched into weeks and months, it became apparent that George Bush, and his cronies, had no use for international organizations. Their attitude stands in stark contrast to the philosophy that Churchill expressed in that Memorable March 5th speech. Winston believed in the UN. He argued that the way to prevent a global war was by putting pressure on Russia, “under the general authority of the United Nations Organization and by the maintenance of that good understanding through many peaceful years, by the whole strength of the English-speaking world and all its connections.” Churchill, along with FDR and American presidents prior to Reagan and Bush, believed in the value of global community.

The second reason that the coalition failed was because of a series of dreadful decisions made by the Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld and the commander of our Afghanistan campaign, Tommy Franks. Among these was over-reliance on “smart” bombs—most of which missed their targets—and the decision to rely upon Afghani mercenaries at the critical point in the search for Bin Laden. Mistakes arising from the arrogance of power.

The third reason for the failure was the invasion of Iraq. Churchill famously called a member of the opposition, “the boneless wonder.” If Winston had been alive on March 19, 2003, no doubt he would have described George W. Bush as “the brainless wonder.” The decision to invade Iraq was such a ghastly blunder that even Republicans acknowledge it. Regan-era National Security Agency director, Lieutenant General William Odom, called it “the greatest strategic disaster in United States history.” Archconservative, William F. Buckley, Jr., recently acknowledged, “The American objective in Iraq has failed.”

When we stand back and look at the string of dreadful decisions made by the Bush Administration since 9/11, one thing becomes ominously obvious: the President and his advisers have no talent for protecting America and building a safer world. The only thing they care about is politics.

Bush failed to capture Osama Bin Laden or curtail Al Qaeda. Moreover, his bumbling has made Bin Laden the folk hero of the Arab street and bolstered terrorist recruiting. Instead of capitalizing on the good will proffered America, after 9/11, George has turned the rest of the world against us. Dubya has ruptured the historic alliances that Churchill touted. The Bush Administration has fanned the fires of religious extremism, both within the U.S. and abroad. Unbelievably, they have failed to take steps to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction throughout the world. Bush has failed to take elementary steps to protect America, such as real port security. Even worse, his thoughtless actions have fueled the flames of Jihad.

The grievous inadequacy of the Bush Administration has brought America to the brink of a horrendous world war. A cataclysm involving religious fanatics wielding weapons of mass destruction from which none of us will find sanctuary.

As we think back to Churchill’s speech, sixty years ago, we are reminded of the importance of that illusive quality—leadership. America requires a real leader in these perilous times. Winston where are you when we need you?

 

Bob Burnett is a Berkeley writer and Quaker actvist. He is particularly interested in progressive morality and writes frequently on the ethical aspects of political and social issues.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments

My name it means nothing, my age it means less. My deeds of activism are mine to enjoy and share as I feel necesary, not as some clown in a small forum's administration thinks I must..This place gets worse each and every visit.
Member banned on June 3, 2008 for repeated abuse of editors.

ardee D.My name it means nothing, my age it means less. My deeds of activism are mine to enjoy and share as I feel necesary, not as some clown in a small forum's administration thinks I must..This place gets worse each and every visit.
Member banned on June 3, 2008 for repeated abuse of editors.

Failure? Failure? What failure......

The Bush administration may very well be the single most incompetent in US history. Bushs' policy of appointing cronies whose only credentials consist of raising money for the GOP has made our government incredibly inefficient and unreliable. HIs wholesale bankrupting of our economy has made stripping the government of essential social services seem a plausible reaction. His ungodly war has increased the number willing to join AlQaeda and oust the "christian crusaders".

But I must ask, are these failures? If ones policies included the ending of governmental financial integrity soas to end its role in the social fabric of our culture, if its agendas included the establishment of a permanent military presence in the middle east, the capturing of vast oil reserves for American use, the creation of vast new wealth and profitability for certain international corporations including his daddy's Carlyle Group, well then whats the beef?

Bush has succeeded in part, but that success is not what the public statements of his goals were to be, in that he failed becuause he never intended them to succeed. His successes are measured in Halliburtons profitability, in the bankrupting of a federal government that is hated by these neocons, and in the turmoil he has caused in the middle east , chaos that will require a large military presence to remain somewhere in that area.

by ardee D. (6 articles, 4 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 2377 comments) on Tuesday, March 7, 2006 at 7:27:21 AM
 

 

1 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

NEW IDEAS ON RESTORING U. S. ECONOMY, for the Next Secretary of Commerce, William Blaine Richardson III by Stephen Fox

Detroit vs. Wall Street: The Trillion Dollar Class War by Cameron Salisbury

Saving the Big 3 for You and Me ...a message from Michael Moore by Michael Moore

SO SAY THE BANKERS: Learn to Love the 'AMERO' by Patrick Henningsen

Credit Card Crisis Is Here / Derivatives Next by Allen L Roland

No Bailout Oversight: Bush Stalls Inspector General Selection by Allen L Roland

Odetta Sings Her First Song, from Way Up Above Us by muservin

Paulson shoots another arrow into the heart of the Economy by Andrew Hughes

STILL UNANSWERED 9/11 QUESTIONS by Allen L Roland

Leading lives of quiet desperation this holiday season by Sheryl Letzgus McGinnis

Go To Top 50 Most Popular