Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
16 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Changing our National Priorities

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It


Become a Fan
  (96 fans)

opednews.com

There are three major trends in American society that must be addressed when the Senate next week debates the federal budget. First, the United States has the most unequal distribution of wealth and income of any major nation in the industrialized world, and the gap between the very rich and everyone else is growing wider. Second, it is a national disgrace that we have, by far, the highest rate of childhood poverty of any major country on earth. More than 18 percent of our kids live in poverty. Third, year after year, we have had record-breaking deficits and our national debt will soon be $10 trillion. That is a grossly unfair burden to leave to our kids and grandchildren. It also is economically unsustainable.

I plan to offer an amendment that addresses these issues, to change our national priorities, and to move this country in a very different direction than where we have been going in the last seven years.

According to the latest available statistics from the Internal Revenue Service, the top 1 percent of Americans earned significantly more income in 2005 than the bottom 50 percent. In addition, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) recently reported that the wealthiest 1 percent saw total income rise by $180,000 in 2005. That is more than the average middle-class family makes in three years. The CBO also found that the total share of after-tax income going to the top 1 percent hit the highest level on record, while the middle class and working families received the smallest share of after-tax income on record.

Meanwhile, while the rich have become much richer, nearly 5 million Americans have slipped out of the middle class and into poverty over the past seven years, including over 1 million of our children.

We have a moral responsibility to put children ahead of millionaires and billionaires. That is why, during the Senate’s consideration of the budget resolution, I will offer an amendment to restore the top income tax bracket to 39.6 percent for households earning more than $1 million a year.

Restoring the top income tax bracket for people making more than $1 million to what it was in 2000 would increase revenue by $32.5 billion over the next three years, according to the Joint Tax Committee, including $10.8 billion next year alone.



I would devote that revenue the needs of our children; job creation; and deficit reduction.

Instead of giving $32.5 billion in tax breaks to millionaires and billionaires, my amendment would, over the next three years, provide:

• $10 billion for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to help about 7 million children with disabilities and, in the process, relieve pressure on local property taxpayers.

• $5 billion for Head Start -- a program which has been cut by more than 11 percent since 2002. Today, less than half of all eligible children are enrolled in Head Start. Only about 3 percent of all eligible children are enrolled in Early Head Start. My amendment would begin to correct this situation.

• $4 billion for the Child Care Development Block Grant. Today, due to inadequate funding, only about one in seven eligible children are able to receive federal child care assistance. Already, 250,000 fewer children receive child care assistance today than in 2000.

• $3 billion for school construction. According to the most recent estimates, schools across the country have a $100 billion backlog in badly-needed school repairs. Investing $3 billion is a small, but important step to help repair crumbling schools across the country and, in the process, create tens of thousands of jobs for painters, carpenters, electricians, and construction workers.

• $4 billion for the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program so that low-income families with children, seniors on fixed incomes, and persons with disabilities will be able to stay warm in the winter. After adjusting for energy prices and inflation, the heating assistance program has been cut by 34.5 percent or $1.3 billion compared to 2002. My amendment would begin to reverse this trend.

• $3 billion for food stamps, so that we can begin to reduce the growing number of children and adults living with food insecurity. x

• $3 billion to reduce the deficit.

This amendment is a fiscally responsible way to reduce childhood poverty, address an income gap greater than at any time since the Roaring Twenties, and lower our deficit.

Senator Bernie Sanders, an independent from Vermont, is a member of the Senate Budget Committee.

 

Bernie Sanders is the independent U.S. Senator from Vermont. He is the longest serving independent member of Congress in American history. He is a member of the Senate's Budget, Veterans, Environment, Energy, and H.E.L.P. (Health, Education, (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Vermont Senate Votes to Overturn Citizens United

Saving American Democracy

Why Do Republicans Hate Social Security?

Wall Street's Secret Oil Games

Bernie Sanders Introduces Single Payer Bill: American Health Security Act of 2013

Socialist Successes

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
11 people are discussing this page, with 16 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I almost wish I lived in Vermont so I could vote f... by ardee D. on Saturday, Mar 8, 2008 at 8:58:41 AM
Now, THERE's some red meat for us all, and our... by Bia Winter on Saturday, Mar 8, 2008 at 9:19:44 AM
I don't have children by CHOICE Bernie because... by Jeanette Doney on Saturday, Mar 8, 2008 at 9:37:59 AM
work your way through a private grammar school?... by John Sanchez Jr. on Saturday, Mar 8, 2008 at 10:32:36 AM
Jeanette Doney, wherever did you get the idea that... by L.M. Arndt on Sunday, Mar 9, 2008 at 5:34:37 PM
What about veterans, disabled and otherwise. Are w... by Arthur M. Howard-(Scotoni) on Saturday, Mar 8, 2008 at 11:00:41 AM
Bernie, these are a good start, but will do nothin... by August Adams on Saturday, Mar 8, 2008 at 11:40:44 AM
Why not just get rid of the Federal Income Tax? It... by Rick Theile on Saturday, Mar 8, 2008 at 3:53:41 PM
I beg to differ in your assessment of such taxatio... by ardee D. on Saturday, Mar 8, 2008 at 9:46:22 PM
Whether the income tax is illegal is something ver... by Darren Wolfe on Sunday, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:38:26 PM
Noone with a scrap of sanity debates the legality ... by ardee D. on Monday, Mar 10, 2008 at 8:22:07 AM
Sorry but your "illegalit... by Darren Wolfe on Monday, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:29:20 PM
Excellent! There will no doubt be wailing about &q... by L.M. Arndt on Sunday, Mar 9, 2008 at 2:47:36 PM
We seem to be able to haul out the national credit... by Darren Wolfe on Friday, Mar 14, 2008 at 5:51:47 AM
I can see the advantages of raising taxes of the w... by Ben Kall on Sunday, Mar 9, 2008 at 4:36:44 PM
The good news is that we are no longer throwing 10... by Blaine Kinsey on Monday, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:33:33 AM