Tags for This Article:

Government (3366)  Rights (1453)  Justice (1383)  Violence (936)  Women (680)  Women Equal Rights (136)  Apathy (54) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
December 19, 2007 at 21:35:50

Headlined on 12/19/07:
Women's Rights: A Step Backwards

by Barbara Peterson     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

Is the United States taking a step backwards in the area of women’s rights? It would seem so. Violence against American women goes un-prosecuted, and women who have suffered remain traumatized with no justice in sight.

 

Millions of women throughout the world live in conditions of abject deprivation of, and attacks against, their fundamental human rights for no other reason than that they are women.” Shall we count America among the oppressive governments that violate an entire segment of their population’s basic human rights?

 

Stephen Fox posted an article on OpEdNews regarding Jamie Leigh Jones: "Waiting for Justice for two years, and nothing.... Jamie Leigh Jones, gang raped by Halliburton employees in Iraq.” When questioned regarding laws that govern American military contractors in Iraq, President Bush expressed that he had no clue, and dodged the question. The video documenting this callous behavior can be seen here. Notice how everyone at the Johns Hopkins school, including the President, thought the fact that he professed to not know the answer was hilarious. An American woman working for an American contractor, allegedly raped by her fellow employees and held against her will for 24 hours, now faces an extended battle to get a court, any court, to hear her case. When questioned regarding accountability for the contractors who are accused of committing the atrocity, the President of America and everyone at the conference has a good laugh. Where is the outrage? Where is the demand for accountability?

Our U.S. government is actually condoning this type of violence against women by its failure to provide an adequate system for dealing with the problem. I doubt seriously that this is an isolated case. When women know that they will be subject to an abusive legal system that only serves to compound the trauma, they will naturally be afraid to complain. Of the women who do complain in the U.S., those who make it to court get little satisfaction from the justice system. The 1994 conviction statistics for the crime of rape are 188 convictions out of 1000 cases.

Even with this appallingly low conviction rate, the Jamie Leigh case stands out as a serious step backwards for women’s rights. And why should we be surprised? America gives aid and assistance on a regular basis to governments that subjugate women and promote violence against them, with no regard for the abused.

 

Abuses against women are relentless, systematic, and widely tolerated, if not explicitly condoned. Violence and discrimination against women are global social epidemics, notwithstanding the very real progress of the international women's human rights movement in identifying, raising awareness about, and challenging impunity for women's human rights violations.

 

We live in a world in which women do not have basic control over what happens to their bodies. Millions of women and girls are forced to marry and have sex with men they do not desire. Women are unable to depend on the government to protect them from physical violence in the home, with sometimes fatal consequences, including increased risk of HIV/AIDS infection. Women in state custody face sexual assault by their jailers. Women are punished for having sex outside of marriage or with a person of their choosing (rather than of their family's choosing). Husbands and other male family members obstruct or dictate women's access to reproductive health care. Doctors and government officials disproportionately target women from disadvantaged or marginalized communities for coercive family planning policies.

 

Cultural relativism...argues that there are no universal human rights and that rights are culture-specific and culturally determined.” This is simply justification for acts of aggression against a weaker segment of society. While each culture has its own unique way of life, that way of life should not include a free pass to torture and subjugate women.

 

Women’s lives matter, whether they are overseas or at home. The appalling apathy expressed by the President of the U.S. and the Johns Hopkins school is unacceptable. Human rights violations committed against both domestic and foreign women are never acceptable, and a lack of accountability for acts of aggression against women is never amusing.

  

Copyright 2007, Barbara H. Peterson

 

Barbara H. Peterson is retired from the California Department of Corrections, where she worked as a Correctional Officer at Folsom Prison. She was one of the first females to work at the facility in this classification. After retirement, she went to college online to obtain a Bachelor's degree in Business, and graduated with honors. The most valuable thing she received from her time with UOP was a realization that her life's passion is writing. Now her business degree sits in her desk drawer, and she counts herself in the category of Writer/Activist. Someday she will make money writing, but that is not why she does it. "I do it because I must. A driving force compels me to reach out to others with what I learn about the condition we the people are in, and that is what I devote my time to. After all, time is the most precious thing we have, and the older I get the more I want to use it wisely." Barbara lives on a small ranch in Oregon with her husband, where they raise geese, chickens, Navajo Churro sheep, Oggie Dog, a variety of cats, and an opinionated Macaw named Rita. She believes that self-sufficiency and localization of food sources will be necessary to survive the coming depression. To this end, she has put up a website to share information at: http://survivingthemiddleclasscrash.wordpress.com. Her philosophy is this: You are on this earth for a reason - to fight for the light. Your words are swords that penetrate the darkness with truth and light. You have a purpose.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 comments

Hater of Nazis above all. Hobbies include activism, military model building, military history, exciting and vital conversation with retired crooks. Retired
John HanksHater of Nazis above all. Hobbies include activism, military model building, military history, exciting and vital conversation with retired crooks. Retired

Just numb

I think that we have become so fearful and angry that we all have been totally demoralized.  Still a lot of people care about this rape just like they cared about Jessica Lynch.  I hug my black hatred of this filth to keep me warm.  If they must bring us down, I plan to have my hands around one of their necks.

by John Hanks (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1376 comments) on Thursday, December 20, 2007 at 9:58:33 AM
 


In 1980, Stephen Fox founded New Millennium Fine Art, a Santa Fe gallery specializing in Native American and Landscape, and is very active in New Mexico Legislative consumer protection politics, trying above to get the FDA to rescind its approval for the neurotoxic and carcinogenic artificial sweetener, Aspartame. [http://www.prlog.org/10070694]

In a strictly legislative context, his most important writing has been for the Hawaii Senate: http://www.prlog.org/10056715-hawaii-senate ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Stephen FoxIn 1980, Stephen Fox founded New Millennium Fine Art, a Santa Fe gallery specializing in Native American and Landscape, and is very active in New Mexico Legislative consumer protection politics, trying above to get the FDA to rescind its approval for the neurotoxic and carcinogenic artificial sweetener, Aspartame. [http://www.prlog.org/10070694]

In a strictly legislative context, his most important writing has been for the Hawaii Senate: http://www.prlog.org/10056715-hawaii-senate ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Bigger picture: America is abandoning ALL human rights?

This is a brilliant and insightful commentary, and I am grateful the author chose to mention my article on the same subject which is posted at opednews.com here:  http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_stephen__071217_gang_raped_by_hallib.htm

I can't help but thinking about all of the thousands of dead Iraqis killed by Halliburton, Blackwater, and by the Army who will never see the inside of an American courtroom for any kind of Justice whatsoever. This author has grasped the larger picture, and her question is very provocative: has America totally or just partially abandoned any commitment to Human Rights? One thing is for sure: the whole picture is going to change after November. Let's hope all of these mercenary corporate serving lackies are permanently thrown out of office!

by Stephen Fox (79 articles, 2 quicklinks, 10 diaries, 443 comments) on Thursday, December 20, 2007 at 9:58:57 AM
 


Barbara H. Peterson is retired from the California Department of Corrections, where she worked as a Correctional Officer at Folsom Prison. She was one of the first females to work at the facility in this classification. After retirement, she went to college online to obtain a Bachelor's degree in Business, and graduated with honors.

The most valuable thing she received from her time with UOP was a realization that her life's passion is writing. Now her business degree sits in her d...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Barbara PetersonBarbara H. Peterson is retired from the California Department of Corrections, where she worked as a Correctional Officer at Folsom Prison. She was one of the first females to work at the facility in this classification. After retirement, she went to college online to obtain a Bachelor's degree in Business, and graduated with honors.

The most valuable thing she received from her time with UOP was a realization that her life's passion is writing. Now her business degree sits in her d...

to see more of bio, click on member name

False Dichotomy

Hi Stephen,

You wrote:

One thing is for sure: the whole picture is going to change after November. Let's hope all of these mercenary corporate serving lackies are permanently thrown out of office! 

I wish that I was that optimistic. However, I believe that we are caught in a false dichotomy. Both parties are equally abhorrent, and voting for the lesser of the evils will only bring more of the same.

 

by Barbara Peterson (46 articles, 80 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 416 comments) on Thursday, December 20, 2007 at 3:30:19 PM
 


Don'pigeon hole me or sterotype me
pratliff94Don'pigeon hole me or sterotype me

What to Power? Did you say TRUTH?

Barbara,

Barbara,This title of Truth to Power would suggest that the ones who claim it are out after truth and not propaganda for some purpose only the Lord knows what.

No difference between Republicans and Democrats? You have to be kidding; surely, you are too intelligent to be that ignorant.

Education: Democrats are against Vouchers in religious schools, Republicans for.

Democrats pro-public education, Republican anti- public education.

SCOTUS-- Compare Ruth Bader Ginsburg to Roberts, Scalia and Thomas.

Graduated Income Tax-- Roosevelt program that Democrats are still far and Republicans are against.

National Health Care without Profit in Medicine--Democrats are far and Republicans are against.

Current Presidential Candidates-- The worst of the Democrats better by leagues than the best and brightest of the Republicans, especially Ron Paul.

Separation of Church and State-- Democrats are far, Republicans against.

Women's Choice in abortion-- Democrats far and Republicans against.

Presidential Choices-- Democrats voted for Al Gore, Republicans voted for George W. Bush. No difference? Are you crazy?

Presidential Choices-- Democrats voted for John Kerry, Republicans voted for George W. Bush.  No Difference? Are you crazy?

Worker and Big Business-- Democrats pro-workers, Republicans pro- big business.

Capital Punishment or Death Penalty-  Democrats against, Republicans for.

Iraq War-- Democrats against, Republicans for.

Environmental Laws-- Democrats for, Republicans against.

Tort Laws--  Democrats AGAINST, Republicans for.

Anti-monopoly laws-- Democrats for, Republicans against.

Anti-trust laws-- Democrats for, Republicans against.

Barbara, I have not touched on the military, Social Security,  civil rights, and a dozen other things. 

Surely, you are introducing a punch line for a joke? Aren't you? Tell me you are?

 

by pratliff94 (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 969 comments) on Thursday, December 20, 2007 at 5:17:14 PM
 


Barbara H. Peterson is retired from the California Department of Corrections, where she worked as a Correctional Officer at Folsom Prison. She was one of the first females to work at the facility in this classification. After retirement, she went to college online to obtain a Bachelor's degree in Business, and graduated with honors.

The most valuable thing she received from her time with UOP was a realization that her life's passion is writing. Now her business degree sits in her d...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Barbara PetersonBarbara H. Peterson is retired from the California Department of Corrections, where she worked as a Correctional Officer at Folsom Prison. She was one of the first females to work at the facility in this classification. After retirement, she went to college online to obtain a Bachelor's degree in Business, and graduated with honors.

The most valuable thing she received from her time with UOP was a realization that her life's passion is writing. Now her business degree sits in her d...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Banker's Manifesto

Have you read the Banker's Manifesto? If not, here it is. Both parties were created to bring about the same end by working towards the same ultimate goal, and that is to bring the people into slavery.

The Bankers Manifesto of 1892

Revealed by US Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh, SR from Minnesota before the US Congress sometime during his term of office between the years of 1907 and 1917 to warn the citizens. 

"We (the bankers) must proceed with caution and guard every move made, for the lower order of people are already showing signs of restless commotion. Prudence will therefore show a policy of apparently yielding to the popular will until our plans are so far consummated that we can declare our designs without fear of any organized resistance.

The Farmers Alliance and Knights of Labor organizations in the United States should be carefully watched by our trusted men, and we must take immediate steps to control these organizations in our interest or disrupt them.

At the coming Omaha Convention to be held July 4th (1892), our men must attend and direct its movement, or else there will be set on foot such antagonism to our designs as may require force to overcome. This at the present time would be premature. We are not yet ready for such a crisis. Capital must protect itself in every possible manner through combination (conspiracy) and legislation.

The courts must be called to our aid, debts must be collected, bonds and mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible.

When through the process of the law, the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and easily governed through the influence of the strong arm of the government applied to a central power of imperial wealth under the control of the leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders.History repeats itself in regular cycles. This truth is well known among our principal men who are engaged in forming an imperialism of the world. While they are doing this, the people must be kept in a state of political antagonism.

The question of tariff reform must be urged through the organization known as the Democratic Party, and the question of protection with the reciprocity must be forced to view through the Republican Party.

By thus dividing voters, we can get them to expand their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us, except as teachers to the common herd. Thus, by discrete action, we can secure all that has been so generously planned and successfully accomplished."

http://www.federalobserver.com/archive.php?aid=7124

          

 

by Barbara Peterson (46 articles, 80 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 416 comments) on Thursday, December 20, 2007 at 5:49:21 PM
 


Having lived six decades now, I've had a lot of experiences! Grew up in a family often oppressed because of our faith - we stood for peace and against war, and for the rights of all regardless of ethnic background. Active from youth in peace and civil rights. Vietnam-era draft resister. Worked for a while for peace and social justice groups, and then became a civil servant. Felt a call to a consistent life ethic, and am currently serving as President of Consistent Life. All this is out of Chr...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Bill SamuelHaving lived six decades now, I've had a lot of experiences! Grew up in a family often oppressed because of our faith - we stood for peace and against war, and for the rights of all regardless of ethnic background. Active from youth in peace and civil rights. Vietnam-era draft resister. Worked for a while for peace and social justice groups, and then became a civil servant. Felt a call to a consistent life ethic, and am currently serving as President of Consistent Life. All this is out of Chr...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Let's be truthful

It looks to me like you're listing the things you're for, and claiming Democrats are for them.  In reality, Democrats are not as different from Republicans as the picture you paint.

The Iraq War was approved by a large bipartisan majority in Congress. Even today, large numbers of Congressional Democrats continue to vote for funding of the War.  None of the "top tier" of Democratic Presidential candidates would promise to bring our troops home by the end of their first term.

And in preparing for future wars, it's even worse.  All the top tier of Democratic candidates favor a larger military budget and increased numbers of soldiers.  The U.S. Senate voted unanimously to give President Bush exactly the U.S. military budget figure he requested in the budget resolution.  Only a handful of House members voted against.

The mlitary-industrial complex effectively owns both the Republican and Democratic parties. 

by Bill Samuel (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 338 comments) on Saturday, December 22, 2007 at 6:55:57 PM
 

 

7 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Keith Olbermann Broke Up With Me! by Shannyn Moore

Children dying in Haiti, victims of food crisis exacerbated by four devastating tropical storms Posted by Stephen Fox

Study Confirms Genetically Modified Crops Threaten Human Fertility and Health Safety Posted by sadelaine

Surviving an Economic Crash: Resources and Tips by Kathryn Smith

Home Depot Founder: Retailers Who Don't Support GOP "Should Be Shot" Posted by Joan Brunwasser

A Turkey By Any Other Name--Is Still the Governor of Alaska by Brasch

Congress Opposes Bush Pardons by David Swanson

Fate of Lakotahs Highlights America's Failed Native American Policies by Stephen Lendman

Obama may choose Monsanto's GE-nightmare over an organic human vision by Linn Cohen-Cole

The Coming of the Second Great Depression? Posted by Nathan White

Go To Top 50 Most Popular