OpEdNews Op Eds

Truth, Lies, and the American Way

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

The media has always been used as a propaganda tool, and the government has always spread propaganda. Now that the multinational corporations control the government, the propaganda machine has gotten increasingly sophisticated, and we the people are its cannon fodder.

Our corporate government controls the mass media, and the mass media controls what we see and hear on television, radio, and traditional newspapers. We are spoon-fed fantasies, and the more we swallow the propaganda, the easier we are to manipulate. These fantasies are created using logical fallacies.

Logical fallacies are abundant in the media, business and government. In fact, businesses use popular logical fallacies to launch entire ad campaigns. Cars are sold, politicians get elected, and businesses thrive on the use of logical fallacies. The bought and paid-for corporate media machine knows how to create ad campaigns designed to manipulate its audience into thinking and believing that a new Mercury Cougar will make up for one's lack of sex appeal because owning a shiny new Cougar is all that any girl wants in a man. We are also told that WTC Building 7, which was not hit by a plane, somehow demolished itself and fell to the ground at free-fall speed in its own footprint, and that the air was safe to breath after three buildings were blown apart, and dust as thick as an erupting volcano filled the air. This is rubbish, but it works! People believe it because the government and corporate media mix truth with lies, and portray the end product as the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. We believe this drivel because believing that our own government leaders are so despicably evil as to cover up the truth behind their campaign for world domination via the "One World Order" is too much of a leap from media-induced fantasy to reality to bear. "The truth? You can't handle the truth!" (A Few Good Men, 1992).

Unless we understand what is happening, and choose to explore the facts even if what those in authority are saying is contrary to those facts, we will remain in a fog, going about our business in a complete state of suspended animation, never even challenging the status quo. In other words, the bad guys get their way and we drive our brand new Tahoes until they tell us we can't. By recognizing the logical fallacies that are being used against us and understanding how they affect our thinking, we can understand the manipulation behind them and start to think independently. Dr. Labossiere (1995), the author of Fallacy Tutorial Pro 3.0 has this to say:

In order to understand what a fallacy is, one must understand what an argument is. Very briefly, an argument consists of one or more premises and one conclusion. A premise is a statement (a sentence that is either true or false) that is offered in support of the claim being made, which is the conclusion (which is also a sentence that is either true or false). …….A fallacy is, very generally, an error in reasoning. This differs from a factual error, which is simply being wrong about the facts. To be more specific, a fallacy is an "argument" in which the premises given for the conclusion do not provide the needed degree of support. (para.2)

Does this sound familiar? How many "facts" are we fed each day by the corporate media that fail even the most rudimentary inspection?

Logical Fallacies are broken down into two categories. These categories are fallacies of relevance and fallacies of insufficient evidence. It states in Critical Thinking (2002), "A fallacy of relevance occurs when an arguer offers reasons that are logically irrelevant to his or her conclusion" (ch.5 p.143 para.1). Chapter six of the same text goes on to define fallacies of insufficient evidence as "fallacies in which the premises, though relevant to the conclusion, fail to provide sufficient evidence for the conclusion" (ch.6 p.162 para.1).

The collapse of Building 7 falls into the "fallacies of insufficient evidence" category. The announcement of "the air is safe to breath" seems to fall into the "fallacy of relevance" category simply because there was no evidence that the air was safe to breath at all. How can one make a judgment without the facts? Without facts, how can the conclusion be at all relevant to them? So, people breathed the crud because they were told it was safe to do so without a mask, and those same people are dying of cancer. Score one for the government and its lapdog media, zero for the people at ground zero.

Now I shouldn't be so hard on the government or the media. After all, they are just doing what they are told to do by their corporate owners. Isn't that what they are here for? We are systematically being molded into a people of the corporations, by the corporations, and for the corporations by a mass media campaign consisting of truths, half-truths, and outright lies.

Fallacies are the building blocks of emotional persuasion. They are abundant in everyday life and used to influence behavior. Understanding these fallacies and the influence they have is the key to independent thought. One can choose to drift with every passing fallacy and succumb to its influence, or rise up, gain understanding, and break through the barrier of ignorance. Critical thinking and independent thought are the best tools one can use for breaking through this barrier. Hirsch (n.d.) defines critical thinking skills as this: "…an ability to analyze ideas and solve problems while taking a sufficiently independent, 'critical' stance toward authority to think things out for one's self" (para.7). Reporters are supposed to do just that unless they become the talking heads of the corporate media machine. Then it's a goose-step to the party line to keep one's job.

Think clearly, analyze, and know what it is you are being asked to believe! It is painfully obvious that the mass media will not do this, so we need to dig for the truth even if what we discover flies in the face of the media barrage, and reveal it to as many people as we can. This is how to fight the planned ignorance program we are being force-fed every day. It is either that, or continue being cannon fodder for the corporations whose only deity is money, and whose loyalties lie wherever there is a profit to be made.

References:

A Few Good Men. (1992).

 

http://farmwars.info

Barbara H. Peterson is retired from the California Department of Corrections, where she worked as a Correctional Officer at Folsom Prison. She was one of the first females to work at the facility in this classification. After retirement, she went to (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 16 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

KINDS OF FALLACIES blaming the victim - in whi... by Guajolotl on Saturday, Aug 18, 2007 at 2:31:03 PM
Philosophy - dialectical contradictions, 1.-... by Guajolotl on Saturday, Aug 18, 2007 at 2:32:14 PM
This is good information, thank you.... by Barbara Peterson on Sunday, Aug 19, 2007 at 10:45:08 AM
I read through all of this (and have it stick... by Blue Pilgrim on Sunday, Aug 19, 2007 at 12:52:25 AM
25 rules of disinformation, here and here has been... by Blue Pilgrim on Sunday, Aug 19, 2007 at 10:25:05 AM
Thank you for the links, I will check them out. He... by Barbara Peterson on Sunday, Aug 19, 2007 at 10:42:54 AM
and it strikes me as rather shallow ranting r... by Blue Pilgrim on Sunday, Aug 19, 2007 at 3:29:17 PM
The article in question encourages the use of crit... by Barbara Peterson on Sunday, Aug 19, 2007 at 5:58:55 PM
The article does much more than that. You say &quo... by Blue Pilgrim on Sunday, Aug 19, 2007 at 7:49:04 PM
You wrote:"Yes, there is much wrong with the ... by Barbara Peterson on Sunday, Aug 19, 2007 at 8:59:30 PM
http://www.austhink.org/critical/ and http://... by Blue Pilgrim on Sunday, Aug 19, 2007 at 9:44:49 PM
I just went to the Critical Thinking site tha... by Barbara Peterson on Monday, Aug 20, 2007 at 4:44:58 PM
Propaganda by Edward L. Bernays - LINKScroll up an... by Co6aka on Monday, Aug 20, 2007 at 11:52:43 AM
This is great stuff. You must have been reading my... by Barbara Peterson on Monday, Aug 20, 2007 at 4:38:44 PM
A copy of Bernays' book in PDF format.... by Blue Pilgrim on Monday, Aug 20, 2007 at 5:39:28 PM
there is an article about Bernays on Uruknet ... by Blue Pilgrim on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 12:39:57 AM

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend


Copyright © 2002-2014, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum