Tags for This Article:

Health (627)  Health (615)  Fraud (406)  Medicare-Medicaid (119)  Medicare Medicaid Failures (44)  Uninsured (37)  Sicko (13) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
August 10, 2007 at 19:44:56

Looking a Gift Horse in the Mouth

by Arthur Joel Katz (Posted by Brasch)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

http://www.opednews.com

Tell A Friend

                 If I had good sense, I would be very grateful to Medicare and the AARP supplemental coverage.  These   insurance schemes have seen me through two knee replacements, several back surgeries, and all sorts of other medical services.   This great privilege has certainly saved me thousands upon thousands of dollars.   Yet I am not happy with Medicare.   It costs us collectively too much.  

         As seen on a recent broadcast of 60 Minutes, the U.S. Controller General David Walker has been running around the country saying that unless we face up to the facts, the U.S. will go bankrupt by 2040.  One of the biggies leading to this mess is the Medicare system.   Walker points out that the first baby boomers  become eligible for Medicare in 2011. As he puts it “when those boomers start retiring in mass, then that will be a tsunami of spending that could swamp  our ship of state if we don’t get serious.” 

       It has often been said, and it is worth saying again, our politicians have been avoiding this problem.  It is the elephant in the room in Washington.  One only had to look at the recent Democrat debate   to see the candidates come out in favor of more and better medical coverage for all.  Actually, I am in favor of that, but certainly attention must be paid to paying the piper.  In practically every other democracy in the world there is some form of universal health coverage and the piper is paid. We don’t have universal health coverage and the piper is not paid even for partial coverage. 

       Those looking for some profound solution here will be disappointed. Instead, I offer two of my favorite gripes.  They both have to do with cutting down the amounts the pipers demand for their services. And both have been effectively used by the other major  democracies to cut their medical costs.  

         First, I think doctors are overpaid as a class.  I realize that getting to be a doctor is hard work.  They had to run a straight “A” in practically all the undergraduate schools they attended and then they had to  go through four years of medical school in which they have to memorize the names of all the bones in the body starting from the hallax (the big toe) through the cranium and all 204 bones in between.  They also had to learn a medical jargon that describes, for example, a pain in the stomach as diverticulitis.

        Thereafter they spend one or two years as an intern.  Finally, depending on the specialty chosen, they are in for several more years of training.  All of this costs money.   By the time they go into practice, they have debts to pay and a desire to start living high on the hog.  Maybe they even deserve it.  

          And high on the hog they live.  There are excellent doctors and not so excellent doctors, but there are very few poor ones. 

   It is a rough guess that at least one out of four mc mansions in Lower Saucon is owned by a doctor. Our community is not unique.  Doctors patronage of high class restaurants is rivaled only by businessmen on expense accounts. 

  They are the new car dealers’ best friends as well as the wine merchants’.    And generally speaking, their kids don’t incur a lot of debt to go to college or, for that matter, medical school if they follow in their parents’ footsteps.  

         A lot of what doctors are paid has to do with Medicare and other insurance plans.  In the old days, when there were still  house calls, doctors’ fees were determined more or less by negotiation between doctor and patient.  The law of supply and demand worked.  Nowadays, the law of supply and demand has all but been repealed.  Fees are set by what Medicare or the insurance companies will allow.  Patients who are covered by insurance basically don’t care what the charges are. Why should they?  They are not paying.            Insurers in general are not crazy and have no great desire to overpay doctors.  They do fight the medical inflation to some extent.   But what the doctors have got going for them is two things: First, they are assured of getting paid.   The American Medical Association (AMA) fought furiously against Medicare.  How lucky doctors are that it didn’t succeed. Often, before Medicare was adopted, getting paid was not a slam dump.  Indeed many doctors found themselves having rendered services because they were human beings and did what was medically necessary even though, as it turned out, the patient could not pay.  So though  insurance may  not have raised the rates, it certainly raised the collections.   Second, they nickeled and dimed the insurance companies in a way they would never have done to a paying patient.  My dermatologist, for example, charges only forty dollars for an office visit which usually involves about three minutes of his time, but if he so much as touches a pimple the service will be reported to Medicare as an operation. (see  below).  My back surgeon, who I love dearly and think a genius, charged somewhere in the neighborhood of $5,000 for my operation.  He did three that day.   Sure he, and the other docs, pay high malpractice insurance, but no question the fees  cover it all and leave enough for more than one Mercedes in the driveway.  

         My surgeon is a very skilled fellow   a plumber would have cost a lot less.  But who does he think he is to be paid like a CEO of a major corporation?  (In fairness to my particular surgeon did take six weeks off last year to volunteer his services to the poor folk with backaches in India and he probably makes no money at all from the various payoffs offered by the drug companies.)           My second gripe has to do with hospital charges.  Last week I received a printout from AARP of what Medicare had paid for services rendered to me and what AARP had paid a hospital doctor as part of my “gap” coverage.  I have been visiting a pain center at a local hospital in connection pain resulting from my various skeletal problems.  The charge from the hospital for the doctor, who seemed at least twenty-five years old and saw me for no more than five minutes, was $100.  To add insult to injury, there was a charge of almost $500 for an operation.   The AARP’s print out contained a number to call if you suspected fraud.  I called it.  I told the lady at the AARP that there had been no operation. Nobody had so much as touched a scalpel during the visit in question.  She asked whether I had received a shot.  When I said yes, she said there was no fraud, a shot was an operation for Medicare purposes.  When I said that was ridiculous, she said I was ridiculous and we hung up.           The knee replacements and the back operations I have had have been fantastically expensive (to Medicare and AARP).  The big back operation which damn near killed me amounted to about one hundred thousand in hospital charges (those aspirins are not free, you know).  Room charges were so high that I might have happily recovered in any five star hotel in New York and probably received prompter service.  

               Hospitals, of course, make their money from patients who are covered by insurance or Medicare and lose it to some extent on patients who come in through the Emergency Room and are uninsured.  Hospitals as a group have played their violins to the swooning public about their desperate plight.  Indeed, some hospitals are or were on the edge of bankruptcy for this very reason.  On the other hand, there seems to be a general building boom in hospitals and very competitive advertising campaigns to fill the beds. Non-profit maybe, but someone must be making big bucks.  

         The quality of treatment in this country for those who can pay is generally excellent.   The insurance companies may get screwed by doctors and hospitals but they do a lot of screwing of patients in return, so don’t cry for them.  Medicare, however, is really us and we are the ones being screwed by these ridiculous prices.  Fixing them, is one small step in the right direction.          

 I end by saying that some of my best friends are doctors.  I hope they don’t read this piece. 

[Arthur Joel Katz is a retired lawyer and former executive producer for Paramount Pictures. He lives in central Pennsylvania.]

 

Contact Editor

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Spurl      Tag!RawSugar      Shadows Tag!      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments

Freelance writer, healthcare advocate
DBRFreelance writer, healthcare advocate

Next time you need surgery, call a plumber

     Retired Attorney and "Paramount Pictures Executive Producer" Arthur Katz notes at the end of his ludicrous doctor-bashing recent piece, Looking a Gift Horse in the Mouth: "I end by saying that some of my best friends are doctors.  I hope they don't read this piece."
     This comment caps off a piece which is simply overflowing with falsehoods, errors and what have to be deliberate misconceptions about the medical profession today.  NO ONE who has friends who are doctors could possibly be this misinformed or this stupid about the medical profession, so I can only assume that he's lying about this, too. (Or, perhaps, he's hoping to make a mock-umentary like Sicko to falsify everything about health care in America.)  And if he DOES happen to have some distant acquaintances who are doctors, I hope they DO read this ridiculous piece, so they can disabuse him of every misguided notion he has.
Of course, Mr. Katz BEGINS this piece by noting "If I had good sense...." which clearly, he does not.
     I sense a lot of anger and envy, which I suppose shouldn't surprise me from someone who has reached retirement age thinking that the popular sports phrase "slam dunk" is properly rendered "slam dump."  What the heck is a "slam DUMP?" Perhaps it was only a typo, but considering how wrong Mr. Katz is about everything else in this piece, I doubt it.  I suspect this is only another example of his predilection for misstatement and misunderstanding of the real world, exacerbated by his years making movies.
     One has to wonder if it's only doctors who Mr. Katz thinks make too much money, or if it's anyone who has more than he does (although something tells me that a former "executive producer for Paramount Pictures" isn't exactly living at the poverty level.)  Clearly, he believes that he is entitled to free health care, foolishly accepting the argument that "universal healthcare" means that no one has to pay for it.  Or, as he puts it: "In practically every other democracy in the world there is some form of universal health coverage and the piper is paid."  Who does he think is PAYING the piper?  Just because healthcare is paid for by TAXES and not health insurance doesn't mean that it doesn't come out of the pockets of the patients.  Or is Mr. Katz too foolish to realize that? 
     Perhaps his McMansion comment was true 20 years ago, when doctors actually DID charge what they believed their services were worth, but that's long gone and the only doctors who "set" their prices today (and, surprisingly, don't hear a lot of complaints about how high they are) are plastic surgeons, who can charge anything they darn well please for botox and tummy tucks and lots of other procedures that don't improve the quality of HEALTH at all.
     Anyone who actually knows something about health policy and health care costs in general knows that doctors' services are one of the smallest pieces of the national health expense pie.  The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics notes that physicians' fees comprise only 19% of health care costs in America.  And physicians' incomes have been on the decline for years, although not enough for Mr. Katz, it appears.  
     As third party payors, including Medicare, have seized greater pieces of the health care market, fees for physician services have GONE DOWN consistently.  Surgeons are paid roughly 40-60% LESS for procedures than they were 10-15 years ago.  A gall bladdar operation which yielded about $1,500 to a general surgeon in Pennsylvania in 1995 pays about $700 in 2007, which includes not only the surgery itself, but pre-op and post-op care.  Other surgical procedures (with the notable exception of aesthetic surgery, which isn't covered by health insurance) have gone down similarly.
     And due to the erroneous formula for Medicare physician payments enacted as part of the 1999 Balanced Budget Act, Medicare payments to physicians are scheduled to decrease YET ANOTHER 40% over the next 10 years (while payments to hospitals and nursing homes are scheduled to rise each year.)  Fortunately, grassroots advocacy by physicians and patients, led by the AMA, has managed to forestall that decrease every year but 2002, when fees dropped 5.4%, but the decreases have merely been lumped together for future years and the flawed formula remains on the books. 
     And while Medicare has reduced what it pays over the past decade, the commercial health insurers have followed suit happily - after all, we all know that it's their job to take premiums and NOT use them to pay providers, which anyone who's ever worked in a doctor's office knows.
Clearly, Mr. Katz has a serious case of RX envy, as his rant about doctors' houses, cars, wine consumption, restaurant patronage and college educations demonstrates.  I have a little trouble comprehending, though, how a "former executive producer for Paramount Pictures" is envying anyone's income....perhaps only those who make movies about people's lives, rather than those who save people's lives, are entitled to a decent living?
     Certainly, today's young lawyers are able to afford all of that and far more - first year associate salaries in large cities like New York, Philadelphia, Boston and Houston have reached $160,000 PLUS bonuses.  (That's for young lawyers JUST out of law school, who've JUST passed their bar exams, putting them at the same educational level as medical students who've just completed their THIRD YEAR of medical school, with one year of school and anywhere from three to eight years of residency still ahead of them before they can even start to look for a real JOB.) 
     Incidentally, the average general practitioner or family doctor, one that's been in practice for many years, makes LESS than $160,000 a year, and with fees going DOWN every year, so much for the McMansions Mr. Katz apparently envies so....
     Atty. Katz claims that in the past, the law of supply and demand worked, when doctors set their own fees and negotiated with their patients.  I couldn't agree more - today's doctors would LOVE to be able to charge what they believe the market will bear - like plastic surgeons, who charge $1,000 a pop for botox shots and the patients THANK THEM.  Unfortunately, it's the government and the CEO's of insurance companies who set prices today, and I suspect they're testing the waters to see how low they can go.  Just HOW LOW can they set fees before doctors can't make enough money to stay in business, or, before they decide it just isn't worth it to work 90 hours a week to serve whining, nasty jerks like Atty. Katz, who admits that his own doctors are terrific, that they've given him great care and relieved him from a lot of pain, but he just doesn't think they're worth what they get paid.....
     Atty. Katz foolishly thinks that insurance companies are FIGHTING medical inflation, when they, in fact, are the REASON for medical inflation.  Check out the salaries of their CEO's - some are making not only SIX figures, but SEVEN figures, and analysis of profits and surpluses (here in PA, the Blues have a SIX BILLION dollar "surplus) will show that precious few premium dollars are actually making their way to health care providers.  
Health care providers are denied payment for services they have legitimately provided EVERY DAY.  I know a nurse practitioner in Maine who was forced to close her private practice when Maine's Medicare program decided not to pay her $18,000 they'd owed her for a year.  She provided the care - they just decided to refuse payment. 
     Medical office staffs face this daily, since insurer's first line of defense is to refuse to pay for everything.  Clearly, Atty. Katz, who claims to have physician friends, doesn't have any friends who work in doctors' offices.  One suspects, though, that he has friends who run insurance companies, since he doesn't say a WORD about what their CEO's make....
     It's nice to know that he begrudges his back surgeon the $5,000 he "charged" for his back surgery.  I wonder if he knows what the surgeon was actually PAID for that procedure.  "Charging" something and getting paid that amount are two VERY DIFFERENT things in health care.  And even if the surgeon DID receive $5,000 for the procedure, so what?  And if he got paid $5,000 for each of three procedures he did that day, so what?  First of all, surgeons don't operate every day - they need to pre-screen patients and post-op patients several days a week.  Most surgeons operate only two or three full days each week. 
     And, having been a lawyer and a producer, Mr. Katz should realize that the surgeon doesn't GET the $5,000 for the case, even if that IS what he is paid for it.  Unless the surgeon's operating out of his fictional Mercedes and has no office, no staff, and no overhead, the majority of that payment goes to cover the cost of running a SMALL BUSINESS.  And we haven't even talked about medical liability premiums yet, which are among the highest in the nation here in Pennsylvania, and which have driven many fine physicians out of the state.  (The highest I've heard was a one year premium of $238,000 for a neurosurgeon, who, rather than paying it, moved to Texas.) 
     Medical liability premiums in PA have increased almost 250% since the year 2000, which is one of the reasons that only 7.8% of young doctors who train in Pennsylvania stay here to practice, down from over 50% only a decade ago.  The average surgeon in PA pays over $125,000 in malpractice insurance - before any other practice expenses are paid.  No, Atty. Katz, fees from Medicare and commercial insurers DON'T cover it all and leave enough for at least one Mercedes in the driveway. And if PA's young doctors are choosing to live where they might be paid more for their 80 plus hour work weeks, well, who can begrudge them that?  (Aside from Mr. Katz, of course, who seems to think that HIS doctors should work free for the honor of taking care of him.)
     I suggest, since Mr. Katz clearly thinks his surgeon and his plumber are in the same category ("My surgeon is a very skilled fellow  a plumber would have cost a lot less."), that the next time he needs surgery, he call his plumber (who incidentally, didn't actually GO to medical school....)  I know one surgeon whose office staff called a plumber to fix a toilet in the office, and the plumber charged (and was immediately paid) more than the surgeon got paid for the appendectomy he'd done at 3 a.m. the previous morning. 
     I was most incensed, however, by Mr. Katz's condescending and obnoxious acknowledgement of his surgeon's "six weeks off last year to volunteer his services to the poor folk with backaches in India and he probably makes no money at all from the various payoffs offered by drug companies."  How DARE he lump a surgeon's altruistic sacrifice of six weeks of his life with payoffs from drug companies?  I would like to know when Mr. Katz offered six weeks of HIS professional life to serve those who couldn't afford HIS professional services?  I would like to know when ANY lawyer in America gave up SIX WEEKS of hourly billing to do pro bono work for the legally underserved?  Physicians donate their time and services ALL THE TIME.  I challenge Mr. Katz to demonstrate that he and other whiners like him have done the same.
     BTW, I'd like to send flowers to the unknown lady at AARP - I hope Mr. Katz got her name.  ("When I said that was ridiculous she said I was ridiculous and we hung up.") 
     I hope that every doctor Mr. Katz purports to know DOES read his piece - and then (legally) find reasons to send him to a plumber next time he needs medical care. 
Donna Baver Rovito

by DBR (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1 comments) on Sunday, August 12, 2007 at 11:24:39 AM
 

 

1 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

 

 

 

 

Articles
Diaries Members
Products Events
Polls  
  

Articles Popularity:

Momentum Building For Bugliosi's Case Against George W. Bush For Murder
by Linda Milazzo

A Declaration of Independence from the Government of the United States
by Anonymous

Bush Fulfills His Grandfather's Dream
by David Swanson

Fortis Prediction of US Bank Meltdown a Net Hoax: The Making of an Urban Legend
by Paul Haughey

POW/MIA Families Alleged McCain Assault: Senate Ethics Committee Failed to Investigate
by elliot cohen

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN GAS REACHES 7 DOLLARS A GALLON ?
by Allen L Roland

Why were 'first responders' de-contaminated at the Pentagon?
by Len Hart

Ex Weapons Inspector: Iran Not Pursuing Nukes, But U.S. Will Attack Before '09
by Jason Leopold

Twenty-five U.S. Military Officers Challenge Official Account of 9/11
by Alan Miller

Free Energy and the Open Source Energy Movement
by jibbguy