I left a comment at the Daily Mail hit piece

To date the comment has not been published.  The newspaper (sic) policy is to choose whatever comments suit them for publication.  That could well explain why there were only 11 comments on the hit piece at the time I read it.  All of the published comments were negative to the actress in lock step with the tone of the article.

In any case, here is the comment I letft for the Daily Mail:

The article cherry picks her words about 9/11.  She DID NOT say that the WTC destruction never happened.  She DID question the official reason given for the collapse. The 10,000 page NIST report describes everything in detail except the collapse.

Hundreds of 9/11 families also believe the 9/11 Commission Report is a whitewash and are demanding that a proper investigation be made.  Thousands of patriots, many former top members of the U.S. military and prior U.S. administrations, also question the official account.

The widespread objection to the lack of proper inquiry is well documented on thousands of web sites, while the mainstream media in the U.S. remains silent.  Try a web search for "911 truth".

While understandable in the face of this media blackout, it is those who accept the official conspiracy theory at face value who are helping to block the arrest and conviction of those who aided in the execution of this terrible crime.

by csnet (0 articles, 2 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 85 comments) on Sunday, March 2, 2008 at 12:10:31 PM
 

Interesting, so did I.

This is what I wrote in the number of characters available:

"Finally, the official story is falling apart. It's time America indicted figures in the US government for murdering 3000 people that day. And America, with the support of the rest of the world, better do it quickly, because Bush and cronies are capable of doing something even worse, such as explode a nuclear bomb in some American city and blame Iran; then call off the elections, declare martial law, and give the order to invade Iran, all of which they are itching to do. And then the high brass military won't object too much. Google "9/11" to see the thousands of websites and articles exposing the lies and describing what really happened, that is, discussing this incredible crime by Bush, his cronies and his backers. That video above, of the plane hitting the second tower, is a fake. An aluminium plane doesn't hit a concrete and steel building at an angle like that and go into it without loss of speed, without smashing into bits, and without bursting into flames."

Needless to say, they didn't want a bar of that. So I made another comment asking them why they were censoring me. Of course, they didn't publish that one either. Perhaps I should send them a third comment telling the creeps they're being talked about. Some poor editor there has to carry out the orders of his superiors. Is the Daily Mail owned by Murdoch?

Sydney, Australia

by Robert Hoogenboom (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 181 comments) on Monday, March 3, 2008 at 5:07:42 AM
 

Daily Mail ownership

DMGT a publicly traded entity is the parent corp of Associated Newspapers, parent of the Daily Mail. 

Now there are 15 comments.  Our comments were not posted, but this single favorable comment was:

I was in America when 9-11 happened and watched it all very carefully. And I think she's exactly right.

- Sam, USA

Maybe they want 20 words or less?

by csnet (0 articles, 2 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 85 comments) on Monday, March 3, 2008 at 11:04:27 AM