Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

MSM's Confusion on Security Gives McCain a Pass

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (8 fans)

Beyond the fight between Barack and Hillary, beyond Rev. Wright, Bosnia fantasies, or issues of race and gender; the biggest impediment to the election of a Democrat in November, is the MSM’s persistent conflating of issues of defense and security; military and civilian leadership.

One recent case in point: Margaret Carlson,
appearing on Countdown with Keith Olbermann, made this unsolicited pronouncement about McCain, in discussing Hillary’s Bosnia-gaffe:

But she‘s so intent now because of having to distinguish herself not just only from Obama but in some ways from Senator McCain who truly does seem much more qualified to be commander in chief.”

Based on what, exactly? Do we automatically assume that those who served in the military are the best civilian leaders? As Randi Rhodes recently pointed out, the job of a good soldier is to follow orders. Sure, a considerable amount of bravery may be involved, and McCain himself survived a horrific five-year ordeal at the Hanoi Hilton. But the decision to commit troops involves the integration of wide range of factors, that go beyond military tactics and strategy.

A similar assumption was made
by George Stephanopoulos on ABC’s This Week - so unquestioned, in fact, that it was phrased as an afterthought to a question, to Joe Lieberman:

Can you name one other big issue aside from the war in Iraq, national security, where John McCain is closer to your view than the Democratic candidates?”

There it is: eight years of brain-washing has sunk in: the Iraq War equals national security. So blind to this equation of all things military with security, that the evidence to the contrary is ignored.

In fact, there’s evidence that the “war” has actually
increased terrorism risk, by becoming a highly successful recruitment tool for creating new terrorists. As The Washington Post reported in 2006, a National Intelligence Estimate found that:

rather than contributing to eventual victory in the global counterterrorism struggle, the situation in Iraq has worsened the U.S. position.

The obsession with military solutions has also skewed budget priorities. In 2004, Mother Jones reported that homeland security - a key component of national security - has suffered as a result of the focus on Iraq, leading to the
Nickel and Diming of Homeland Security. As Matthew Brzezinski explains:

Hamstrung by special interests, staffed with B-team political appointees, and crippled by a lack of funding and political support, DHS is a premier example of how the administration's misplaced priorities—and its obsession with Iraq—have come at the direct expense of homeland security.”

National Security expert
Steven Flynn wrote, also in 2004, of the neglected home front, and the folly of separating homeland security from national security:

The transportation, energy, information, financial, chemical, food, and logistical networks that underpin U.S. economic power and the American way of life offer the United States' enemies a rich menu of irresistible targets. And most of these remain virtually unprotected.”

More recently, Flynn warned of
five disasters that could occur if the U.S. doesn’t rebuild its infrastructure - increasing our vulnerability to terrorism.

The equating of war-making with security, and military experience with wise leadership, has already had dismal consequences. In Election ‘08, it’s also causing the media to give John McCain a huge pass on national security. Let’s demand that the media recover from this shorthand, in order to elevate the debate.

 

http://www.amazon.com/Amy-Fried-Ph.D./e/B004QOOD04/ref=ntt_d

Amy Fried is the author of "Escaping Dick Cheney's Stomach." She received her Ph.D. in Organizational Behavior, and has been an advocate for church-state separation and other civil liberties issues. She writes on women's issues, media, veganism and (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

What Erectile Dysfunction Ads Say About Our Culture and Our Health

What Makes a Good Leader?

Confessions of a Junk Food Vegan

Why Disability is a Feminist Issue

Old Enough to be Raped

What Part of "Emergency" Don't You Understand?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 5 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
you left out the fact that McCain repeatedly admit... by James Katz on Thursday, Apr 3, 2008 at 8:46:08 AM
I don't believe that the main stream media is ... by John Haigh on Thursday, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:06:49 AM
It's Vietnam all over again.  Both wars s... by Dianne Lipson on Thursday, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:38:58 AM
That the only important qualifications for a Presi... by Susan Nelsen on Thursday, Apr 3, 2008 at 1:29:20 PM
Thanks everyone, for all the great points!... by Amy Fried, Ph.D. on Thursday, Apr 3, 2008 at 4:51:07 PM

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend


Copyright © 2002-2014, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum