Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Don't Blame Veganism for Child Neglect

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (8 fans)
In a sad and tragic story, the news recently broke that a “vegan couple” were found guilty of starving their 6-week old baby to death. The AP story reports that the couple fed the baby mostly soy milk and apple juice. If that’s true, then the couple’s crime wasn’t that they were vegan. They were either incredibly misinformed, stupid, or both.

First, one wonders why a child so young was not being breast fed. Veganism, which involves avoiding all animal products, including meat, fish, poultry, eggs and dairy, does not in any way preclude breast feeding. In fact, one of the arguments in favor of veganism is that the milk of cows is best suited for calves, the same way that human milk is best suited for baby humans.

Second, even if the couple wanted to use a soy product instead, any pediatrician would have told them to use a soy-based formula, not soy milk. In fact, most soy milk products are clearly labeled as NOT being a substitute for baby formula.

Contrary to what the judge in this case apparently believes, there is nothing inherent in the vegan diet that should be dangerous for children.

An
online pediatrician’s guide explains how vegan babies and children can easily be kept healthy on a vegan diet. And most of the advice that’s relevant - breast feed for at least a year, and take your vitamins - would be given to vegans and carnivores alike.

It’s unfortunate that such misinformation about the vegan diet still abounds, even among otherwise educated people. People get particularly emotional at the idea of separating children of all ages from cow’s milk. In her enlightening book, Nature’s Perfect Food: How Milk Became America’s Drink. Melanie DuPuis looks into some of the reasons why. While many vegan activists and other followers of food politics correctly point to the heavy influence of industry - particularly the National Dairy Council - Du Puis discovered that the fervor for milk pre-dated even those forces. Specifically, the idea that milk is vital for children went hand-in-hand with the profound changes in the family brought about by the Industrial Revolution. With men leaving the home to work in city factories, women became pre-occupied with a new set of duties that went along with their new urban lifestyles, which precluded breast-feeding. Others were forced to also work outside of the home, which also discouraged breast-feeding. There were also pressures to abstain from breast-feeding in order to boost fertility.

In the early-to-mid 1800's, “experts” started to cast doubt on the competence of mothers to breast-feed their children. (It had only worked for millennia before then!) On a deeper level, discouraging breast feeding was a way of wresting control over a part of the economy previously controlled by women. As Du Puis puts it:

“Throughout the history and prehistory of the human species, breast milk provided the major sustenance for a person’s first year of life…. In other words, women’s breast milk production represented a significant part of the human food economy…. One does not have to be a member of La Leche League to understand that a significant economic change took place when women’s bodies were removed from food production.”

Sadly, Du Puis also points out that the switch to cow’s milk - especially before regulation and pasteurization - contributed greatly to infant mortality.

Which brings us back to today’s unfortunate story. From what can be gleaned from the AP story, it sounds like the couple was responsible for the infant’s death. But their mistake had nothing to do with their veganism.

 

http://www.amazon.com/Amy-Fried-Ph.D./e/B004QOOD04/ref=ntt_d

Amy Fried is the author of "Escaping Dick Cheney's Stomach." She received her Ph.D. in Organizational Behavior, and has been an advocate for church-state separation and other civil liberties issues. She writes on women's issues, media, veganism and (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

What Erectile Dysfunction Ads Say About Our Culture and Our Health

What Makes a Good Leader?

Confessions of a Junk Food Vegan

Why Disability is a Feminist Issue

Old Enough to be Raped

What Part of "Emergency" Don't You Understand?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

This couple was irresponsible and negligent. Their... by Heather Moore on Thursday, May 10, 2007 at 3:00:51 PM

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend


Copyright © 2002-2014, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum