Tags for This Article:

Media Distortion (849)  Progressive Values - Issues (696)  Right Wing (354)  Right Wingers Endangering America (289)  Right Wing Spin (278) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
April 21, 2007 at 15:42:37

Blaming the Victim

by Amy Fried     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

As Media Matters reported, a slew of right wing pundits, including Neal Boortz and Michelle Malkin, have stooped so low as to blame the victims of the Virginia Tech massacre, for their own deaths. Safely from their TV studios, they decried the lack of courage these college students demonstrated in the face of an enraged, mentally ill gunman - Why didn't these college kids just storm the gunman? Piece of cake!

It is, of course, a ridiculous question. But besides extreme insensitivity, these pundits were demonstrating a
social psychological defense mechanism known to researchers in the field of social cognition. On the one hand, people who “blame the victim” are trying to defend the comforting concept that we live in a “just world.” Even the most cynical of us needs some degree belief in the “Just World Hypothesis,“ in order to go through life. On the other hand, they’re defending their sense of their control over their environment, another survival skill. Thus, by blaming the victims, those not party to the crime can control their own sense of vulnerability. In other words, by convincing themselves that they would have stormed the mass murderer (yeah, right), they can assure themselves that they could never be so victimized.



It's ironic to recall that the same accusation was hurled at the Jewish victims of the Holocaust - they were
accused of being too passive, in the face of the huge, efficient machine erected by the Nazis. It is doubly ironic that a hero of the Virginia Tech story was himself, a Holocaust survivor, who died - as Keith Olbermann pointed out - on Holocaust Remembrance Day.

(It almost goes without saying that rape victims have also been blamed for their victimization - though that dynamic has additional baggage associated with it, due to the bizarre, cross-cultural tendency to assign women responsibility for men’s sexual behavior.)

However, this psychological defense mechanism does not explain why this absurd response to Virginia Tech is so concentrated on the Right. George Lakoff pointed out the association of conservatism with the “Strict Father” view of the ideal family, where discipline and self reliance reign supreme. Lately, however, it seems the continued obsession by the Right with machismo, and homophobia, has exceeded even Lakoff‘s scenario. The unrelenting drumbeat of “Sissy!” -if only by implication - would be comical, if it were not being used on matters of life and death, such as the Iraq occupation. From Ann Coulter’s calling John Edwards a “faggot,” to Bush and Cheney accusing critics as not having the “stomach” or “resolve” to finish the job, to Tucker Carlson’s reference to Senator Clinton as “castrating” (though he never seems to call her Senator); this obsession needs to be challenged.

After all, is the world suffering from a lack of testosterone? Is there a shortage of heterosexuals? Are we all suffering from an overdose of empathy?

This obsession constitutes a set of values, that have led to many of the problems that plague us today. For instance, from a macho point of view, it’s so much more satisfying to engage in acts of violence and war, than to engage in diplomacy and long-range foreign policy strategy. It provides a better sense of ego gratification to execute convicted criminals than to advocate gun control. And it’s so much easier to fill our prisons, than to work toward improving education and health care, and support parenting and child care. But then, that wouldn’t be the macho thing to do.

 

http://neoconmind.blogspot.com

The author received her Ph.D. in the field of Organizational Behavior, which she now applies to her political writing. She's been an advocate for church-state separation and other civil liberties issues. She writes on the neoconservative mind, women's issues, media, veganism and the Religious Right.

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 comments

customer service flunky for a major insurance company. Have 2 Master's degrees, have studied abroad, and like many of my generation (Gen X) are underpaid and underemployed for our levels of education compared to previous generations. Scraping by while looking for my ideal career.
Johncustomer service flunky for a major insurance company. Have 2 Master's degrees, have studied abroad, and like many of my generation (Gen X) are underpaid and underemployed for our levels of education compared to previous generations. Scraping by while looking for my ideal career.

A few well-placed CHL holders might've made a difference

I don't blame the victims. I blame a university administration that prohibited legal concealed carry permit holders enrolled at the university from carrying their legally concealed weapons on campus as a general rule. A few of them in the right place, at the right time--older undergrads, grad students or a professor--might've reduced the death toll markedly. Cho was in violation of university regulations for 5 months by keeping his Glock 9mm on campus. I guess they can expel him posthumously. Because of a quirk in VA state law, Cho's psychiatric observation at the hospital, because it was deemed "outpatient" rather than in-patient, meant he was able to pass the background check for the firearms purchases. The VA Ledge should probably tighten this state rule.

The professor, the Holocaust survivor who died trying to protect his students was certainly brave, but only marginally effective. If he'd kept a loaded revolver in his desk the story might've turned out very VERY differently.

And there is something to the statement about courage. I don't know that I would've reacted any differently than the students did. Probably not. I'm a selfish person focused mainly on self-preservation...but if I had been able to come to the conclusion that I was already dead no matter what I was about to do (or not do), I might've worked up the courage to charge when the Glock 9mm was being reloaded. I'd still be facing down a loaded Walther P22, and a .22 LR shell in the right place can still kill...but unless he got off a lucky headshot, even if he fatally wounded an attacker by emptying the P22 into him, his attacker still has about 10 seconds of action to close the distance and strike with whatever blunt object is at hand. But it takes uncommon bravery and a real communitarian spirit of placing the lives of your fellow community members on par with your own. Most of us don't do that, sadly. Our Founding Fathers understood that intimately in a way that just isn't commonly understood anymore. There were no organized police forces in their day...defense against criminals, or tyrants, or foreign invaders was a community affair, with every able bodied man expected to bear arms in defense of his community. Even with an organized police force, they can't be everywhere at once. Police forces mainly investigate crimes after the fact and aid in criminal prosecution. Armed frontline defense is STILL a community affair, regardless our modern delusions about personal defense being merely a "private" affair, somehow a little seedy and unseemly.

FYI, A well concealed snub revolver is the best rape-prevention device I know of for women. Read some Massad Ayoob articles sometime.

I'm no Right winger. I consider myself a Leftist, a socialist, a Freethinking atheist, and a Green.

But I'm very pro-2nd Amendment. University regulations didn't stop Cho, but it did possibly stop those who could've stopped him.

by John (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 17 comments) on Sunday, April 22, 2007 at 10:19:36 AM
 

 

2 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Keith Olbermann Broke Up With Me! by Shannyn Moore

Children dying in Haiti, victims of food crisis exacerbated by four devastating tropical storms Posted by Stephen Fox

Study Confirms Genetically Modified Crops Threaten Human Fertility and Health Safety Posted by sadelaine

Surviving an Economic Crash: Resources and Tips by Kathryn Smith

Home Depot Founder: Retailers Who Don't Support GOP "Should Be Shot" Posted by Joan Brunwasser

SO SAY THE BANKERS: Learn to Love the 'AMERO' by Patrick Henningsen

A Turkey By Any Other Name--Is Still the Governor of Alaska by Brasch

Congress Opposes Bush Pardons by David Swanson

Fate of Lakotahs Highlights America's Failed Native American Policies by Stephen Lendman

Senate testimony by police captain reveals 9 sticks of missing dynamite in 'Omaha Two' bombing case by Michael Richardson

Go To Top 50 Most Popular