![]() |
|
|
December 30, 2006 at 19:01:05
SADDAM'S HANGING A SMOKESCREEN FOR U.S. CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY by Allen L Roland Page 1 of 2 page(s) |
|
|
The Iraqis are not fooled by Saddam's hanging for they know this drama is being produced for an American audience who will ignore America's ongoing crimes against humanity, under the guise of liberty, and see Saddam's death as a sign of progress and a justification for a new ' surge ' in troops to secure Baghdad and perpetuate the Cheney/Bush agenda of death and global domination.
Bush's macho posturing is not fooling the Iraqis ~ about 90 percent of Iraqis feel the situation in the country was better before the U.S.-led invasion than it is today, according to a new ICRSS poll.
The pictures of a dangling Saddam may please a sadistic and vengeful Bush ~ but it will most certainly be a vivid reminder to most Americans and the rest of the world of our deepening moral disgrace. This certainly falls in line with a recent International poll that named George W Bush as the greatest menace to mankind and International peace.
Bush's demonizing of Saddam is the ultimate projection of his own dark side ~ which he continues to externalize on others in his demonic black and white world.
Burhan al-Chalabi, former chairman of the British Iraqi Foundation, shares his honest knowledgeable views on Saddam's hanging with the Guardian.
Excerpt: " The invasion and occupation of Iraq was an act of U.S. imperialism, marketed as a war of liberation ... The UN's legal and moral authority has been undermined....The U.S. presents the Iraqi people with this phoney act of accountability ( Saddam's Hanging ), but no one has been held accountable for invading and occupying Iraq or the mass human rights abuses carried out in the process... "
Allen L Roland
http://blogs.salon.com/0002255/2006/12/30.html
WHAT DO ACTUAL IRAQIS THINK ABOUT THE EXECUTION OF SADDAM HUSSEIN ?
Burhan al-Chalabi, former chairman of the British Iraqi Foundation, gives his view in the Guardian: The Trials of Occupation.
Excerpts:
" The imminent execution of Saddam Hussein is nothing but a smokescreen - a diversion in a series of diversions that will do nothing to address the price of the occupation of Iraq. If the Bush administration truly wanted to curb the cycle of bloodshed, it would come clean and share with the US public, the Iraqi people, and the international community the real goals of this disastrous neoconservative adventure.
The invasion and occupation of Iraq was an act of US imperialism, marketed as a war of liberation. Iraq was chosen ahead of Iran or Syria because it had been weakened by 13 years of sanctions. It provided the opportunity to station US bases in the Middle East, and a vantage point to monitor Iran. Control of the massive oil reserves was not to be sniffed at, either.
It was assumed that Iraqis' distaste for Saddam would somehow make occupation acceptable.
It has, of course, proved to be anything but acceptable. It has proven unacceptable to the people of Iraq, the Middle East, and the world over. Today, a country is occupied and its sovereignty violated. The UN's legal and moral authority has been undermined.
Iraq's cultural heritage is in tatters, its natural resources squandered, its infrastructure destroyed.
1 | 2
Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
WAGE PEACE NOT WAR
Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers
http://www.allenroland.com
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
| 1 comments |
|
How long did it take to find find a quot to support your twi
I was stationed in Iraq with the 1st Stryker Brygade from OCT '03-OCT '04. We were some of the first in charge of helping the new government in Iraq set up the police force and Army, as well as training them; we also bairly missed getting Saddam ourselves. A friend of mine was actually in the squad that did actually catch him. The Iraqies there however, were upset with us, as in America, for having ever taking Saddam out of Iraq in the first place; they wanted to kill him there and then, right after they found out that we cought up with him. So unless you're geting information from someone in his home town to fit your views; I seriously doubt your expressing the views of anyone, but yourself and a very small pecentage of Iraq that is in and around Tikrit. Of corse you can always find the small percentage of Shiite's in Iraq that agree whole heartedly with you, I'm sure. People over here in the states however keep forgetting that it is the Sunies who are the majority in Iraq; they were oppressed and driven down during the entire rein of Saddam. Then you have the Kurddish; who he tried single handed to exterminate! If you had live in the 1940's would you had said the U.S. and the Allie's had commited crimes against humanity then as well? Or is it that in your mind a man like Saddam isn't to be held accountable for crime against humanity like the Nazis were, or is it that you felt that they shouldn't have; I just missed that article? by TBI 10/04 (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 2 comments) on Sunday, Dec 31, 2006 at 9:04:39 PM
|
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |