Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
March 15, 2008 at 21:39:23

View Ratings | Rate It

UnLocke-ing Local Politics

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By Phillip Barron, Posted by Phillip Barron (about the submitter)     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Posted by Phillip Barron - Writer

A March 2007 report from the John Locke Foundation (JLF) encouraged NC DOT and cities around the state to widen roads as the primary transportation strategy for economic development and alleviating congestion.

In April that year, I wrote a column for the Herald Sun questioning the study’s findings, casting doubt in particular on whether the findings even applied to Durham. As I did then, I still encourage you to read it for yourself. I noted then,

By [David Hartgen’s] own admission, single-occupancy driving declined in Durham between 1990 and 2000, the time period at which his academic gaze is focused. The data show, and so he also admits, that carpooling and use of public transit increased. He notes further that “Durham is the only urbanized area in the state to report declining solo driving times and increased carpooling and transit shares between 1990 and 2000.” You might think, then, that the conclusions he reaches for Charlotte or Raleigh ought to differ from the conclusions he reaches for Durham’s future.


Across the state, however, it’s all the same. Eliminate transit. Widen roads. Pave early and often.


Concluding the article, I asked,

Whether DOT will side with the John Locke Foundation or Durham residents remains to be seen, but the question remains for each of us to consider.

Do roads exist to serve people or cars?


At the time I wrote that, I thought Durham had strong, visionary leadership that could see through the misguided Civitas/John Locke Foundation mindset which thinks of road widening as economic development.

The City still has an able Transportation department, and in November the people of Durham voted against the Art Pope-backed candidate for mayor. So, why is City Council considering toeing the JLF line? What happened to our leadership?

On his website Endangered Durham, Gary Kueber has some rich thoughts on why City Council may lack the self-confidence to send NC DOT back to the drawing board, but the bottom line is that it looks like City Council is afraid of giving up $28 million in planned development.

Even when that $28 million would make Alston Avenue more dangerous for pedestrians, cyclists, and arguably even for drivers.

If you don’t know this area well, you might need some help visualizing it. You might also need some help visualizing what a good redesign could look like. In his March 14th post, Kueber has satellite imagery of the current state of things, but I also encourage you to visit the intersection of Highway 55 and Highway 54 for perhaps the best case scenario of what could possibly come out of NC DOT’s design. Keep in mind, there’s no guarantee that Alston will magically develop as the intersection of 54 and 55 has, since this portion of Alston lacks the close proximity to RTP. I’m throwing it out there only as an example of very wide highways with “economic development” on all corners.

It’s also worth pointing out that the intersection of 54 and 55 doesn’t sit in the middle of a neighborhood. It’s light industrial and commercial. Alston Avenue, however, bisects several mill villages, and strip-mall development is about the best one can hope for.

But strip-malls are not the only form of economic development. Nor, when you offer people choices, are they the most desirable. Truly supporting a community is about encouraging the development of outlets that meet the community’s needs.

Paving and widening, then, is about as destructive as you can get.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Editor

 

Book Recommendations for "Community Durham"
The 1926 Miners' Lockout: Meanings of Community in the Durham Coalfield (Oxford Historical Monographs)
by Hester Barron

$115.00
Lowest New Price $107.54

Number of pages: 320
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA

LATENT IMAGE 2: PHOTOGRAPHS FROM THE DURHAM COMMUNITY.
by Bill (editor). Baxter

$12.74

Number of pages:
Publisher: Duke Univ.,

Lordship and the Urban Community: Durham and its Overlords, 1250-1540
by Margaret Bonney

$55.00
Lowest New Price $46.27

Number of pages: 324
Publisher: Cambridge University Press

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum