Not Shown

The Pakistani Smoking Gun of 9/11

By       Message John Doraemi     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 2098
- Advertisement -
Crimes of the State Blog

Many people don't understand, or choose not to believe, that evidence exists of multiple wire transfers in excess of $100,000 to alleged "lead hijacker" Mohammed Atta prior to 9/11, and that these wire transfers are linked to the then head of Pakistani intelligence (ISI).

This is a complex area, and is clearly the subject of a vigorous disinformation campaign. Many aliases have appeared in U.S. newspapers which don't correlate to the names given in previous reports regarding: just who IS this "Al Qaeda paymaster?"

If you have some time, definitely read the Cooperative Research compendium of news accounts regarding Ahmed Omar Sayed Sheikh.  As you can imagine, his name can be spelled in numerous ways, as can any of his aliases. This has been a source of much confusion.

Let's clarify what this information about wire transfers proves:

1) At a minimum, it proves cover-up by high level U.S. government officials, a cover-up of the financial sponsors of the September 11th 2001 attacks on America.

a) FBI Director Robert Mueller admitted to the Congressional inquiry that many wire transfers were sent in 2000 and 2001 from several bank accounts in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) to and from alleged 9/11 hijackers.  Aliases linked to those bank accounts were provided, as well as the specific money amounts.

- Advertisement -

b) The 9/11 Commission Report stated bluntly:

"To date the U.S. government has not been able to determine the origin of the money used for the 9/11 attacks. Ultimately the question is of little practical significance." -THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT, p 172.

c) Senator Bob Graham, chairman of the Senate Select Intelligence Committee, who was in a breakfast meeting with ISI chief Ahmad during the 9/11 attacks, has said that "states," plural, assisted the purported 9/11 attackers. Graham refuses to name these states.

d) Orwellian transcript--Condoleezza Rice was confronted by the press on May 16, 2002. The transcript of that encounter has been altered...doctored both on CNN and in the "FDCH Federal Department and Agency Documents REGULATORY INTELLIGENCE DATA." The words "ISI chief" disappeared from history, down the memory hole. This is black-and-white proof of cover-up.

- Advertisement -

e) Numerous press reports, which were confirmed by U.S. officials, linked the Atta money transfers to Omar Saeed Sheikh and to Pakistani ISI. Yet this has never, ever been addressed by the U.S. government, nor explained by any "investigation" into the 9/11 attacks. They have, literally, pretended that these news articles were never written.

2) The U.S. State Department confirmed that "Shaykh Sai'id (aka, Mustafa Muhammad Ahmad)" was linked to terrorist funding in Bush's Executive Order 13224, "a powerful tool to impede terrorist funding," in the attached "ANNEX."

Well, isn't that interesting!? The guy's listed on an Executive Order about terrorist funding, but not in the 9/11 Commission Report!

I searched the report:

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

John Doraemi publishes Crimes of the State Blog: http://crimesofthestate.blogspot.com/

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact EditorContact Editor
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

No George Monbiot, These Are The Facts of September 11th 2001

Has Al Gore's CO2 Theory Fizzled Out? (part one)

9/11: Robert Fisk's Skepticism vs. Manuel Garcia Jr.s Shameless Propaganda

The Suppressed September 11th

Al Gore Doesn't Accept the 9/11 Cover Up, So Why Do You?

Debating "Skeptic Magazine" on September 11th Issues