The two undersigned Vietnamese American Bar Associations together request that you condemn the Vietnamese communist government's recent attempt to chill free speech in America when that government arrested American citizen Cong Thanh Do on August 14, 2006, during his family vacation in Vietnam, and imprisoned the Californian engineer for 38 days on the ludicrous charge that he plotted to bomb the U.S. Consulate in Ho Chi Minh City.
The Vietnamese government could not produce any evidence to support the charge. Mr. Do, an American pro-democracy activist, who immediately sought help from the above U.S. Consulate for a safe return to the U.S., vehemently protested the charge by going on a hunger strike that lasted until his release. Absent even a scintilla of evidence to justify the charge, Mr. Do's arrest could only be attributed to the fact that while at home in America, he had published calls for peaceful democratic reforms in Vietnam.
By arresting Mr. Do, the Vietnamese government punished him for exercising his freedom of speech as an American while in America, a right guaranteed to him by the U.S. Constitution, which members of these bar associations took an oath to support. Furthermore, Mr. Do's arrest surpassed the human right violations that the Vietnamese government commits daily against its own citizens. The arrest amounted to an effort by that government, in violation of international laws, to assert the force of its tyrannical regime extraterritorially to chill free speech in this country.
Such a blatant affront to our sovereignty and to the spirit of our Constitution must not go unanswered. As members of the bars, the attorneys in these associations are committed to the defense of liberty. As members of a community that has escaped tyranny to call this land home, we are also committed to the defense of democracy. Our commitment to those ideals compels us to issue this call today:
The chilling effect of Mr. Do's imprisonment on free speech in America, especially among Vietnamese Americans, must be contained. That can only be done after the Vietnamese government stops defaming Mr. Do, clears his name, apologizes to his family and, as a corrective gesture, releases all prisoners-of-conscience. Toward that end and to ensure that the Vietnamese government will never again threaten Americans' free exercise of our inalienable rights, we call upon the U.S. government to assert all necessary and appropriate pressures on the Vietnamese government.
Sincerely,
_______/signature in PDF/__________________________________________________
On behalf of the Vietnamese American Bar Association of Northern California,
Candice Hamant, VABANC President
_________/signature in PDF/___________________________________________
On behalf of the Vietnamese American Bar Association of Southern California,
Yen "Jeannie" Nguyen, Director, Board of VABASC
---
Vietnamese American Bar Association of Northern California
15 N. Market Street San Jose, CA 95113 vabanc.org vabanc@gmail.com
If it means what it means, the Va- Banc means ' a bold move.' The term is from the cards game and implies 'going for all of it.' or ' winner takes all'. So, here is my rhetorical question: how come we do not hear the VABANC's voice protesting horrible violations of the US and international laws in the US, protesting Gitmo, torture, renditions, Patriot ACT ( John Yoo is Vietnamese, right? I might be mistaken here), cangaroo courts, military tribunals, etc. They are lawyers, for God's sake! Or maybe they are 'His Majesty's' lawyers at service and only protest what happens in other countries?
En passant (just passing by)
by
Mark Sashine (72 articles, 19 quicklinks, 269 diaries, 4101 comments [131 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Tuesday, Nov 14, 2006 at 11:39:33 AM
(0+)
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
How would you rate this?
You must be logged in (if signed up) to do ratings.
It's free to signup! And easy. And takes just a minute or two....