John Bolton: "This is exactly why we voted against the new human rights council."
An official in the newly formed UN Human Rights Council has called for a fresh investigation into the events of 9/11 in order to examine the possible role that neoconservatives may have played in the attacks.
The New York Sun picked up the story today, explaining that Richard Falk, a professor of international law emeritus at Princeton University, and an expert on human rights was assigned to a new position within the council on March 26.
His role is to report on human rights in the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Arabs.
Two days prior to the announcement, Falk appeared on former University of Wisconsin lecturer Kevin Barrett's radio show and spoke of how he is keen to see a fresh investigation into 9/11 in order to address inconsistencies in the official account of what happened.
Mr. Falk told Barrett, "It is possibly true that especially the neoconservatives thought there was a situation in the country and in the world where something had to happen to wake up the American people. Whether they are innocent about the contention that they made that something happen or not, I don't think we can answer definitively at this point. All we can say is there is a lot of grounds for suspicion, there should be an official investigation of the sort the 9/11 commission did not engage in and that the failure to do these things is cheating the American people and in some sense the people of the world of a greater confidence in what really happened than they presently possess."
www.waronyou.com
Hey I run WARONYOU.COM,
It all about news. Im just a another concerned citizen. I like to write and discuss news in forums. Viral video is fun.
You can certainly understand John Bolton's consternation at having a UN body looking for evidence that he and his fellow conspirators want hidden forever. I've always maintained that if there is nothing to hide than why all the obstruction to prevent the truth being revealed? Why are the videos of the Pentagon hit not being released? Is it because they will show a missile not an aircraft hit the Pentagon? Why is no one explaining the presence of the most technologically laden aircraft in the U.S. military at the scene of the twin towers attacks? Why the stand down orders to the fighter jets that should have protected the towers? There are too many whys which haven't been answered and too many excuses as to why they haven't been. answered.
by
Archie (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1130 comments)
on Wednesday, April 16, 2008 at 2:50:39 PM
All 3 buildings came straight down at free fall in less than 12 seconds each into their own footprints, never fully explained in the official 9-11 reports.
The "Project For A New American Century" is up front stating their number one goal of projecting forever American hegemony over the Middle East, first by attacking Iraq, then Iran, would be virtually impossible absent "a new Pearl Harbor".
9-11 six months later was their "golden opportunity" to make it happen at last. Most certainly, what looks like "controlled demolitions" can't be anything else.
The scientific facts surrounding these implosions once officially revealed to the world community can free the world from the constant fear and terror generated by and since 9-11.
9-11-38 - Hitler - the rise of evil power. The words of fanaticism heard today echo back to Hitler's 9-11 - country has suffered a dark day - a day that has changed everything - face a new kind of enemy - strike them preemptively - without hindrance to quaint laws - interrogate them with new techniques until they confess - those who question are dangerous indeed CLICK HERE http://www.youtube.com/watch?/v=nmfzDHyN9G0
by
Gene Cappa (28 articles, 0 quicklinks, 31 diaries, 206 comments)
on Wednesday, April 16, 2008 at 4:39:14 PM
3 comments
How would you rate this?
You must be logged in (if signed up) to do ratings.
It's free to signup! And easy. And takes just a minute or two....