![]() |
|
|
March 12, 2008 at 07:59:39
9/11 Qui Tam Jurisdictional Challenges Filed - 2/29/08 by RuGBYZHG Page 1 of 5 page(s) |
|
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Two Qui Tam cases - U.S. District Court, SDNY -- 9/11 related One alleges Twin Towers destroyed by Directed Energy Weapons Other alleges No Planes hit the towers
Directed energy weapons toxic effects continue at Ground Zero
Contact:
Jerry V. Leaphart,
Attorney for Dr. Judy Wood and Dr. Morgan Reynolds
p -- 203-825-6265
f -- 203-825-6256
e -- jsleaphart@cs.com
See also:
Website of Dr. Judy Wood:
Website of Dr. Morgan Reynolds
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
|
|
|
|
| 9 comments |
|
More Information
Both ARA and SAIC are Silver-Level Sponsors of the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS). Click here for more on ARA and SAIC. DEPS, founded in 1999, put out their first newsletter one year before 9/11. The 9/11 attacks, the 9/11 cover up, and the 9/11 "truth movement" were orchestrated by people associated with directed energy weapons and the media: by CB Brooklyn (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 465 comments [18 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:35:45 PM
|
|
Even More Information...
*Directed Energy Weapon Sponsors and Department of Defense Contractors by CB Brooklyn (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 465 comments [18 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:59:17 PM
|
|
Corrected Link to WTC Task Force Interviews
by RuGBYZHG (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 18 comments) on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:21:14 PM
|
|
Reply: Correction to my correction
by RuGBYZHG (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 18 comments) on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:27:30 PM
|
|
Reply: Proper Embed
by CB Brooklyn (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 465 comments [18 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Wednesday, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:27:49 PM
|
|
parts of the problem
Judy Wood, Morgan Reynolds and CB Brooklyn are all part of the problem of getting to the truth of the events of911. They assert outlandish ideas and thus thow the truth movement into arguing among itself rather than arguing with the authorities. The facts are simple and clearly show that explosives were used to bring down the towers. And that is a fact regardless of whether or not real planes hit the towers. Evidence of the residues of thermite has been found. Thermite may be incendiary or explosive depending on its formulation. There is other evidence of explosives which does not fit with an energy beam. See the papers in the Journal of 9/11 Studies by gravity32 (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 201 comments [38 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Mar 13, 2008 at 3:33:33 AM
|
|
Reply: People With Limited Thinking Often Don't See It.
There is no evidence of thermite/thermate. If Steven Jones had such smoking gun proof, he would have brought a lawsuit forward just as Drs Wood and Reynolds have. Even if Jones were too chicken to file an actual lawsuit, still he would have mentioned thermite/thermate in the Request for Correction his team filed with NIST, again, like Drs Wood/Reynolds have with directed energy weapons and TV-Fakery. Obviously Jones has no evidence of thermite. Even if he did, it would not be traceable since thermite is purchasable on Ebay. And since Bush already blamed explosives on Al Qaeda as seen in this video (didn't Bill Clinton do this too, recently?), it’s obvious what the perps plans are. Besides, a read through my articles (linked in my first comment above) show Steven Jones to be a plant to distract people from the directed energy weapon and TV-Fakery evidence. A plant who also discredited free energy research in the 1980s. by CB Brooklyn (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 465 comments [18 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Thursday, Mar 13, 2008 at 7:48:50 AM
|
|
Reply: Just WHO is Gravity32?
May we know his real name? May we know when he has filed his Qui Tam (or similar) case and stood by his evidence? May we seean article about his court filings? Or is he just making empty, meaningless disparaging posts in a last ditch effort to convince others that the Jones crew have some viable evidence to work with? Or are his arguments as empty as the WTC site was of debris by 11am on 9/11/01? by Andrew Johnson (2 articles, 1 quicklinks, 6 diaries, 97 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Mar 13, 2008 at 5:17:43 PM
|
|
Best of Luck...
And thanks! Blessings to All, "The American People" by Sha Llel (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 90 comments) on Thursday, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:41:16 PM
|
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |