|
|
,
Add to My Group(s)
Add to My Group(s)
By Rev. Bill McGinnis (about the author)
Become a Fan -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)
Yesterday, the United States Senate voted 56 to 34 in favor of considering a bi-partisan resolution opposing President Bush's decision to increase the number of US troops in Iraq. Ten Senators did not vote.
MP3 audio clip at http://www.loveallpeople.org/senateopposesbushtroopsurge.mp3
This brief audio clip is "Fair Use" under our Copyright Laws
It was widely understood that a vote in favor of considering the anti-surge resolution was a vote in favor of the resolution itself, in that every Senator who voted to consider the anti-surge resolution was expected to vote in favor of the resolution itself, had it been brought to a vote.
But the resolution itself will not immediately come to a vote, because Bush supporters in the Senate employed a parliamentary maneuver which required at least sixty votes in order to consider the resolution.
The concurrent resolution to be considered was the same as the one already passed by the House Of Representatives, which was . . .
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Disapproving of the decision of the president announced on 10 January 2007, to deploy more than 20,000 additional United States combat troops to Iraq.
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), that:
1. Congress and the American people will continue to support and protect the members of the United States Armed Forces who are serving or who have served bravely and honourably in Iraq; and
2. Congress disapproves of the decision of President George W Bush announced on 10 January 10 2007, to deploy more than 20,000 additional United States combat troops to Iraq.
Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6370459.stm
# # #
HTML version of this message at
http://www.loveallpeople.org/senateopposesbushtroopsurge.html
Become a Fan -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)
MP3 audio clip at http://www.loveallpeople.org/senateopposesbushtroopsurge.mp3
This brief audio clip is "Fair Use" under our Copyright Laws
It was widely understood that a vote in favor of considering the anti-surge resolution was a vote in favor of the resolution itself, in that every Senator who voted to consider the anti-surge resolution was expected to vote in favor of the resolution itself, had it been brought to a vote.
But the resolution itself will not immediately come to a vote, because Bush supporters in the Senate employed a parliamentary maneuver which required at least sixty votes in order to consider the resolution.
The concurrent resolution to be considered was the same as the one already passed by the House Of Representatives, which was . . .
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Disapproving of the decision of the president announced on 10 January 2007, to deploy more than 20,000 additional United States combat troops to Iraq.
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), that:
1. Congress and the American people will continue to support and protect the members of the United States Armed Forces who are serving or who have served bravely and honourably in Iraq; and
2. Congress disapproves of the decision of President George W Bush announced on 10 January 10 2007, to deploy more than 20,000 additional United States combat troops to Iraq.
Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6370459.stm
# # #
HTML version of this message at
http://www.loveallpeople.org/senateopposesbushtroopsurge.html
www.LoveAllPeople.org
Rev. Bill McGinnis is an Internet Christian minister, writer and publisher. He is Director of LoveAllPeople.org, a small private think tank in Alexandria, Virginia, and all of its related websites, including (more...)
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
 Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
 View Authors' Articles |
Comments
The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.
This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.
| No comments |