Tags for This Article:

Corruption (1846)  Clinton-Hillary (1101)  Elections_Campaigns (470)  Campaign Contributions (150)  James Watson (2) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
October 30, 2007 at 11:01:27

Clinton Quid Pro Quo for Racist Nobel Laureate

by Mike Kuykendall     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

Although I say to friends all the time that I will wind up supporting whichever candidate that wins the Democratic primaries, including Hillary Clinton, more and more news items are edging me closer and closer to outright opposition to her candidacy.  The latest zinger comes from the <a href="click here Times</a>- it seems both Senator Clinton and Chuck Schumer may have received campaign contributions from DNA pioneer and <a href="http://news.independent.co.uk/sci_tech/article3067222.ece">racist Nobel laureate</a> James Watson in return for donations to his previous employer, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory;<blockquote>Mrs. Clinton and Sen. Charles E. Schumer, also a New York Democrat, requested a $900,000 earmark in June for the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, where James D. Watson served as chancellor before resigning last week after apologizing for comments that suggested that people descending from Africa aren't as intelligent as those from Europe.
<p>Federal campaign filings show that Mr. Watson has donated more than $70,000 to candidates and their political causes, including a total of $3,000 to Mrs. Clinton's presidential campaign on May 17 and June 25. Two days later, a Senate committee report showed that Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Schumer earmarked $900,000 for the lab.</p></blockquote><p></p>If it weren't for the inappropriate timing, and the scientist's horrid and frequent racist remarks, this might not look so bad.  As it stands I think both Schumer and Clinton will quietly end up returning the money.

After the debacle(s) of the Bush presidency it is imperative that the next president demonstrate freedom from moneyed special interests, especially morally questionable ones.  Unfortunately this episode endangers this possibility, and adds fuel to John Edwards' "corporate Democrat" argument against the front-runner.

 

http://indigentahole.blogspot.com

Mike Kuykendall is a progressive, patriotic veteran of the U.S. Air Force, fighting hard to save our democracy.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Keith Olbermann Broke Up With Me! by Shannyn Moore

Children dying in Haiti, victims of food crisis exacerbated by four devastating tropical storms Posted by Stephen Fox

Study Confirms Genetically Modified Crops Threaten Human Fertility and Health Safety Posted by sadelaine

Surviving an Economic Crash: Resources and Tips by Kathryn Smith

SO SAY THE BANKERS: Learn to Love the 'AMERO' by Patrick Henningsen

Home Depot Founder: Retailers Who Don't Support GOP "Should Be Shot" Posted by Joan Brunwasser

A Turkey By Any Other Name--Is Still the Governor of Alaska by Brasch

Congress Opposes Bush Pardons by David Swanson

Fate of Lakotahs Highlights America's Failed Native American Policies by Stephen Lendman

Senate testimony by police captain reveals 9 sticks of missing dynamite in 'Omaha Two' bombing case by Michael Richardson

Go To Top 50 Most Popular