General News

The 60 Vote Dead Spider Routine Returns (How To Get Out of Iraq)

By John Willford  Posted by Kevin Gosztola (about the submitter)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

A BUZZFLASH READER CONTRIBUTION

As the late Ronald Reagan was fond of saying, "Well ... there you go again."

War Bills From Both Parties Fail in Senate (AP/NY Times)

Earlier in the week, the news was that the Democrats had grown backbones, and were actually going to call the Republican bluff on filibuster:

TheHill.com - Senate Dem leaders float plan for forced filibuster

I guess they have now decided to get around for their turkey break, rather than face up to the challenge of an open and extended debate on the Senate floor.

Clearly, neither house of Congress has shown the vote margins to overcome a veto by Mr. Bush. However, after an extended filibuster revealing the extent of rubber-stamp complicity of the Right with their president AND a Bush veto, the responsibility for the horrific Iraq Occupation will be "abundantly clear," as another Republican president used to say.

Congress may then refuse to return the Bill to the floor in either house, although the return of Jesus seems more likely to happen first.

I must commend Senator Dodd for voting against this Bill on the grounds that it does not go far enough. The free license to hunt and kill whoever we wish, which remains in the Bill, is unacceptable, and the timeline and conditions of closure of the Occupation are too vague. The result is authority for business as usual into our fifth year of Occupation, at least until January, 2009.

For a variety of reasons, it would indeed be best if this supplemental funding Bill, so far as it applies to Iraq, were simply withdrawn. However, the essential actions needed by the Congress to end the false war posturing of Mr. Bush is to end both Authorities to Use Military Force, the first used in Afghanistan and the second in Iraq. At least with respect to the Iraq resolution, passed in October, 2002, Senators on both sides of the isle have called for closure or modification:

Clinton Proposes Vote to Reverse Authorizing War - New York Times

Senators Seek Update to Iraq Authorization - washingtonpost.com

The governing legislation for both Authority to Use Military Force resolutions is the War Powers Act of 1973. This legislation specifies terms for closure, and requires a prompt up or down vote. Closure is NOT subject to presidential veto, and is not subject to filibuster or a 60% requirement to bring it to the floor.

Once the War illusion is taken away, Congress can begin to assert its Constitutional power to demand closure of the Occupation, and can require a plan for the orderly and safe withdrawal of forces.

Congress not only has the POWER to do this, it has the RESPONSIBILITY. 

John Williford
Richland, WA

Next Page  1  |  2

 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Editor

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

We Do Not Consent to Warrantless "Porno-Scanning" in Airports

Do They Put Lipstick on Pigs at the Funny Farm?

How Private Prison Corporations Hope Arizona's SB1070 Will Lead to Internment Camps for Illegals

Why the Battle Against TSA Groping and Body Scanners is Justified

Give Obama a Chance to Do What?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments