The Justice Department issued a directive to every US attorney in the country to find and prosecute cases of voter fraud in their states during the height of hotly contested elections in 2002, 2004, and 2006, even though evidence of such abuses was extremely thin or non-existent, a former federal prosecutor says in a new book.
David Iglesias, the former US attorney for New Mexico, recalled receiving an email in late summer 2002 from the Department of Justice suggesting "in no uncertain terms" that US attorneys should immediately begin working with local and state election officials "to offer whatever assistance we could in investigating and prosecuting voter fraud cases," Iglesias writes in his forthcoming click hereIn Justice: Inside the Scandal that Rocked the Bush Administration, an early copy of which I obtained last week. The book is scheduled to be published in June.
Iglesias was one of nine US attorneys who were fired in December 2006 for reasons that appear to be based entirely on partisan politics. His name was added to a list of US attorneys selected for dismissal on Election Day in November 2006.
Earlier this month, Congress filed a civil lawsuit against Joshua Bolten, President Bush's chief of staff, and Harriet Miers, the former White House counsel, in an attempt to compel them to testify before Congress about the White House's role in the US attorney firings and to turn over documents to a congressional committee. Miers and Bolten were subpoenaed by Congress to testify last year but Bush refused to allow their testimonies citing executive privilege. Last month, Congress held Miers and Bolten in contempt for failing to respond to the subpoenas. Attorney General Michael Mukasey said he would not convene a federal grand jury to consider the contempt charges. Congress sued the White House officials shortly thereafter.
In a chapter titled "Caged," Iglesias recounts how the Department of Justice aggressively pushed him and other US attorneys to prosecute voter fraud cases, an issue the former US attorney says the DOJ became unusually obsessed with.
"The e-mail imperatives came again in 2004 and 2006, by which time I had learned that far from being standard operating procedure for the Justice Department, the emphasis on voter irregularities was unique to the Bush administration," Iglesias says.
Iglesias says that Republican officials in his state were far less interested in election reforms and more intent on suppressing votes.
"But there was a more sinister reading to such urgent calls for reform, not to mention the Justice Department's strident insistence on harvesting a bumper crop of voter fraud prosecutions. That implication is summed up in a single word: caging."
"Not only did the [Bush] administration stoop to such seamy expedients to press its agenda in 2004," Iglesias wrote. "It had the full might and authority of the federal government and its prosecutorial powers to accomplish its ends."
Vote caging is an illegal tactic to suppress minorities from voting by having their names purged from voter rolls when they fail to respond to registered mail sent to their homes. The Republican National Committee signed a consent decree in 1986 stating they would not engage in the practice after they were caught suppressing votes in 1981 and 1986. Last July, in a letter to then Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, Senators Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island) and Edward Kennedy (D-Massachusetts) said, "caging is a reprehensible voter suppression tactic, and it may also violate federal law and the terms of applicable judicially enforceable consent decrees." Senators Rockefeller (D-West Virginia) and Whitehouse have called for a Justice Department probe into the practice, which has not been initiated thus far.
Documents released last year showed that Republican operatives engaged in a widespread effort to "cage" votes during the 2004 presidential election in battleground states, such as New Mexico, Nevada, Florida, and Ohio, where George W. Bush was trailing his Democratic challenger, Senator John Kerry.
The efforts to purge voters from registration rolls were spearheaded by Tim Griffin, a former Republican National Committee opposition researcher and close friend of Karl Rove. Griffin resigned from his post as interim US attorney for Little Rock Arkansas when details of his involvement in vote caging were reported. Griffin's predecessor at the US attorney's office, Bud Cummins, was one of the nine US attorneys forced to resign. Coddy Johnson was another Republican operative involved in the effort to cage votes during the 2004 presidential election. Johnson worked as the national field director of Bush's 2004 campaign and spent time in the White House as an associate director of political affairs, working under Karl Rove. Johnson's father was Bush's college roommate at Yale.
Last week, Iglesias testified before the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration probing the "myth" of in-person voter fraud and whether it leads to the disenfranchisement of individual voters.
During his testimony, Iglesias told the panel that he established an election fraud task force in September 2004 and spent more than two months probing claims of widespread voter fraud in his state.
"After examining the evidence, and in conjunction with the Justice Department Election Crimes Unit and the FBI, I could not find any cases I could prosecute beyond a reasonable doubt," Iglesias told the Senate committee last week. "Accordingly, I did not authorize any voter fraud related prosecutions."
There is no concrete evidence of systemic voter fraud in the United States. Many election integrity experts believe claims of voter fraud are a ploy by Republicans to suppress minorities and poor people from voting.
Jason Leopold is editor of the online investigative news magazine The Public Record, http://www.pubrecord.org, and the author of the National Bestseller, "News Junkie," a memoir. Visit www.newsjunkiebook.com for a preview. He is also a two-time winner of the Project Censored award, most recently, in 2007, for an investigative story related to Halliburton's work in Iran. He was recently named the recipient of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation's Thomas Jefferson Award for a series of stories he wrote that exposed how soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan have been pressured to accept fundamentalist Christianity.
"bushed" case #1,555 of crime committed by this administration that won't get prosecuted.
In the near future we won't have to worry about "election fraud", "voter fraud" or even an election for that matter ... one could argue that our elections as they stand now are a total fraud. I sincerely beleive we have a 50% chance of not having an election this year, and if we do a 90% chance that it's rigged.
by
Mr M (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 5 diaries, 1062 comments)
on Monday, March 17, 2008 at 12:14:37 PM
This is THE ISSUE people!, if we can't trust voting and the election process, what good is fighting for a certain candidate? Unfortunately, like the previous commenter, there are signs that our election process is rotten from its core, way deep inside our election apple. It's where few people look and most assume it is just fine. I cynically shake my head and hope that our letters, talk and books like these can affect change. I cant wait to read this book. thx Jason for the good review.
by
x woj (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1 comments)
on Monday, March 17, 2008 at 12:39:35 PM
the 111th congress should take is to ramp up the investigations of the Gonzales Mukasey Judiciary, only with a Democrat appointed AG. That'll shake the truth out.
by
Rob Kall (728 articles, 3775 quicklinks, 311 diaries, 1521 comments)
on Monday, March 17, 2008 at 12:43:54 PM
While this is possible, I am skeptical that a new democratic president, even with a large majority congress, will want to pursue a serious investigation of much of anything from the Bush administration. Without impeachment hearings, there will be strong pressure in the next administration to just ignore what happened in the past. At best I imagine there will be a tepid white-wash that will sound forceful but mean nothing, and very little will be done to undo the abuses of Cheney and Co.
by
Tony Duncan (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 15 comments)
on Monday, March 17, 2008 at 1:04:36 PM
Iglesias is a constant voice of reason in response to this Administration. His legal focus to Don Seigelman and other abuses by the Justice Department have been helpful in shining a light on them. Wish there were more like him.
With the 9/11 Truth Commission, the reminders of the dishonesty that got us into the Iraq war, the recent Winter Soldier stories of abuses in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Federal appointees who have ignored their obligations to their regulatory functions they were suppose to carry out, one wonders what part of "abuse of power, violation of oath of office, obstruction of justice and malfeasance" our Congressional Representatives don't understand. How bad must things be before they do anything? Must we start a revolution in the streets? Initiate a coup? Exactly what will it take for them to wake up and act? Very disheartening and discouraging to see just how terrible things have gotten. Nothing short of a total house cleaning of Republicans and most of the Democrats in Congress is going to fix this mess I fear.
by
Peter Wedlund (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 128 comments)
on Monday, March 17, 2008 at 4:16:01 PM
