Tags for This Article:

Iraq War (2079)  History (938) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ;
Add to My Group
November 14, 2007 at 13:00:12

The war in Iraq is simply a Symbolic event.

by James Strait     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

http://www.opednews.com

Tell A Friend

Someone once noted, the first warrior actually, that war is an imprecise venture. The modern struggle against Islam, aka the war on terror(ists), is the most imprecise of them all. It is our modern hundred years war, into which we are already three decades deep. 9/11 changed the rules of engagement. While it is my belief that our response was measured and modest, it was the best that could be mustered in the narrowed window of opportunity available to retaliate. Immediately following 9/11 was a pressure cooker of need. The need to know everything about everyone, the need to balance the equation, the need to send a message. But now, millions of American citizens and the world complain that our reasons for war with Iraq are based on lies. Bad news to follow; It is worse than that, the war is based on truth. That truth being that we obliterated Iraq for no other reason that we needed to send the message that we will do ANYTHING (short of using nukes) to win. The war in Iraq is purely symbolic.  

While it may be unappetizing to consider that we would waste a middle east nation and endanger tens of thousands of US troops just to send a message, it may also be the ultimate rationale. Just as US and British forces did near the end game of World War Two, where we fire bombed Hamburg, Dresden, Tokyo, and many other non strategic venues, and of course plasticized Hiroshima and Nagasaki with atomic weapons, Iraq is our modern equivalent to those symbolic raids of yesteryear. The destruction of those German and Japanese cities was for little other purpose than to send the message that the United States and her allies were prepared to do ANYTHING to win the war. The message was received.

However, in today's world the war against global Islam is far more challenging. The Japanese and Nazi's were girl scouts compared to Islam's lunatics. And since war is inevitable, and since affidavits from God are not available guaranteeing the righteousness of war, then failing that authorization from on high mortal men make hard and often callous decisions knowing that little good can come from it. Such was Iraq.Conventionally, little good has come from the war in Iraq.

Democracy is unlikely to succeed in the middle east because it is incompatible with the tenants of Islam. No matter when US troops leave, Iraq and that entire area of the world will descend into another cycle of madness. Thus, when fighting madmen it is imperative to let them know that you too will do ANYTHING to stop them.The war in Iraq was the only overt action that we could wage and even remotely justify. And since world leaders think in the scale of the grand stage, our leaders recognized that we needed a symbolic action, and since Iraq was ruled by a bad actor, and since we already had troops in the area, opportunity had met preparation. The rest is history and a thorn in the side of those that do not understand the reasoning.

While all the while based in truth, the war in Iraq is purely symbolic. Failing clear lines of battle, expect more of the same. Our danger as the good guys is to not become monsters while in the process of slaying monsters. Easier said than done, but to our credit, historically we have been quite good at it.

 

Host of "American Voices" radio-Wednesdays 7-8PM Eastern & Co-Host of popular "Strait & Kall"radio programming- Thursdays 8-9PM Eastern, airing on WNJC1360 in the Philadelphia Pennsylvania radio market(live internet stream www.wnjc1360.com); Frequent guest/co-host on "Voice of the Voters" radio. Most importantly, a concerned and involved American.

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Spurl      Tag!RawSugar      Shadows Tag!      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 comments

A writer is a rogue goose. All other gees fly in a flock formation; every goose knows his place and time for honking. The rogue goose is undisciplined. He leaves the formation indiscriminately to have a look at it from aside. He roams back and forth, takes a peep at the leader, honks a little bit from behind, distracts everyone and writes on what he sees. Time passes and as he wants to return back to his place he discovers someone else there. Thus he either has to wait until they land for rest...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Mark SashineA writer is a rogue goose. All other gees fly in a flock formation; every goose knows his place and time for honking. The rogue goose is undisciplined. He leaves the formation indiscriminately to have a look at it from aside. He roams back and forth, takes a peep at the leader, honks a little bit from behind, distracts everyone and writes on what he sees. Time passes and as he wants to return back to his place he discovers someone else there. Thus he either has to wait until they land for rest...

to see more of bio, click on member name

I saw many things on this site

but the following beats all of them:

'However, in today's world the war against global Islam is far more challenging. The Japanese and Nazi's were girl scouts compared to Islam's lunatics. And since war is inevitable, and since affidavits from God are not available guaranteeing the righteousness of war, then failing that authorization from on high mortal men make hard and often callous decisions knowing that little good can come from it. Such was Iraq.Conventionally, little good has come from the war in Iraq.

I am not sure  whether the above is full  of just ignorance, or maybe ignorance and malice or maybe just malice because  the  ' lunacy' definition does not apply here anymore- the author is not  mentally sick, unfortunately.

It would be pointless to  explain  anything  to the author here. I sincerely hope that  the author never  gets into position which surely serves him right- that is when someone else would  characterise him   the same way he talks about other people or targets him for eternal war. As for now  I would like to state only that ' we'  here is not justified.  Nope. We here, the people of America are not  in the same boat with the statement above, thank goodness.  We do not  fight with ' global Islam'. Bush  says we do. The author of this article   follows him.   Let them both go... you know where.

by Mark Sashine (44 articles, 19 quicklinks, 228 diaries, 3268 comments) on Wednesday, November 14, 2007 at 2:39:36 PM
 


Undergraduate degree in political science and philosophy: summa cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa; with postgraduate work in political economics. Postgraduate degree is a juris doctorate. I am a voracious reader and, although I make no claim to expertise, have self studied in logic, linguistics, theology, theoretical physics, macroeconomics, technical and fundamental market analysis, world history, and many other subjects, which I believed at the time helped explain the world around me.

...

to see more of bio, click on member name

W.M.L.Undergraduate degree in political science and philosophy: summa cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa; with postgraduate work in political economics. Postgraduate degree is a juris doctorate. I am a voracious reader and, although I make no claim to expertise, have self studied in logic, linguistics, theology, theoretical physics, macroeconomics, technical and fundamental market analysis, world history, and many other subjects, which I believed at the time helped explain the world around me.

...

to see more of bio, click on member name

WRONG COUNTRY

Your argument might make some sense if Iraq had not been a secular country.  However, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Afghanistan were the hotbeds of radical Islam, not Iraq.  So what message would we be sending in WWII if we firebombed Bagdad to teach the Germans a lesson?  According to the government's theory, the attack was carried out by Saudi nationals, and funded by Saudi money.  And it is the Saudi madrassas that teach radical Islam.  Hence, we were attacked by Saudi Arabia.  Pakistan's ISI trained the Taliban and assisted them in their rise to power, and the Taliban gave safe haven to Al Queda in Afghanistan.  Again, hence, if we were going to demonstrate that we would go to any lengths, we would have attacked Afghanistan, the Pakistan nukes, and either Medina or Mecca.  That would have been going to any lengths.  Sorry, but it is all about the oil.

by W.M.L. (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 259 comments) on Wednesday, November 14, 2007 at 2:53:17 PM
 

 

2 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

24 hrs 48 hrs
72 hrs 1 week
1 month 6 months
1 year All Time
Articles
Diaries Members
Products Events
Polls  
  

Articles Popularity:

GOP whistleblower names Karl Rove in Ohio's 04 election theft
by steveheller

Epilepsy Study Incriminates Aspartame in Medications
by Dr. GLEN MABSON, Phd. Epileptic Foundation of Maui dba Pacific Epilepsy Society

Dalai Lama: "I Love President Bush... but... Lack(s) Understanding of Reality"
by Rob Kall

Bill C51 in Canada is a MAJOR WARNING to all of us. Fascism is coming in through food and health products.
by Linn Cohen-Cole

You Say You Want a Revolution?
by Olga Bonfiglio

The Greatest Bank Robbery of the Century
by William Helbig

Excuse this interruption of deadly serious matters, to ask what you're packing for the internment camp stay.
by Linn Cohen-Cole

Lieberman At Hagee Conference: U.S. Should Attack Iran because God Hates Israel's Enemies
by Gustav Wynn

Nine Republicans Break Party Ranks: Send Impeachment Article to Judiciary for Hearings
by Ralph Lopez

False Flag of Terror
by Kelly Mitchell