Tags for This Article:

Other (962)  News Categories (142)  Broadcasting (47) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ;
Add to My Group
March 25, 2008 at 06:43:59

Fox News Refuses to Pay FCC Indecency Fine

by Frank Ahrens, Washington Post Staff Writer (Posted by Viki)

www.opednews.com

 
 
Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

Fox Refuses To Pay FCC Indecency Fine
 
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, March 25, 2008; Page D01

 

In an unusually aggressive step, Fox Broadcasting yesterday refused to pay a $91,000 indecency fine levied by the Federal Communications Commission for an episode of a long-canceled reality television show, even as the network fights two other indecency fines in the Supreme Court.

The FCC proposed fining all 169 Fox-owned and affiliate stations a total of $1.2 million in 2004 for airing a 2003 episode of "Married by America," which featured digitally obscured nudity and whipped-cream-covered strippers.

Fox appealed immediately after the FCC ruling. Last month -- four years later -- the FCC changed its mind, saying it would fine only the 13 Fox stations located in cities that generated viewer complaints about the program. That reduced the fine to $91,000.

Despite the sharp reduction, Fox said it would not pay the fine on principle, calling it "arbitrary and capricious, inconsistent with precedent, and patently unconstitutional" in a statement released yesterday.

Typically, after the FCC determines that a broadcaster is culpable for an indecency fine, the broadcaster pays it -- by writing a check to the U.S. Treasury -- or may attempt to negotiate a settlement, sometimes dragging the process out for years. Sometimes, a broadcaster will take a case to court. Other times, the broadcaster will pay the fine and appeal, hoping for a reversal and refund.

Instead, Fox has asked the five FCC commissioners to reconsider the fine without its having to pay, a move that sets Fox in a two-front indecency war: It is battling the FCC at the agency level on the "Married" fine and in the Supreme Court on other indecency fines levied at about the same time.

Last week, the Supreme Court said it would take up FCC v. Fox Television Stations this fall. The lawsuit filed by the network aims to overturn FCC fines levied in 2002 and 2003. In each case -- live broadcasts of awards shows -- variations of a vulgar four-letter word were uttered on the air.

It is the first time the Supreme Court has taken up the subject of broadcast indecency since its 1978 FCC v. Pacifica Foundation decision, in which the court upheld the agency's authority to fine broadcasters for indecent programming.

The FCC had previously declined to fine television stations for "fleeting," or one-time use of, profanities, but reversed itself in 2004 after initially ruling that the same word, when uttered by singer Bono during a live show in 2002, was not indecent. The decision was followed by a torrent of viewer and lawmaker scorn, and the FCC changed its policy, saying even such fleeting profanities can bring a fine.

The FCC forbids over-the-air radio and television stations from broadcasting "patently offensive" material of a sexual or excretory nature between the hours of 6 a.m. and 10 p.m., when children are most likely to be in the audience.

"We believe in enforcing indecency standards, especially when children are watching," said FCC spokeswoman Mary Diamond.

Fox is owned by Rupert Murdoch's News Corp., a $60 billion company that also owns 20th Century Fox movie and television studios; dozens of magazines and newspapers, including the Wall Street Journal and the New York Post; satellite television networks in Europe and Asia; the MySpace social Internet site; and HarperCollins Publishers, among other assets.

 

Contact Editor

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments

i am a former teacher of 30 years with a history and political science major.I started getting politically active when Ronnie Regan ended my social security hopes for teahers
liberalsrocki am a former teacher of 30 years with a history and political science major.I started getting politically active when Ronnie Regan ended my social security hopes for teahers

great Republican strategy

If one looks deeper into why Fox refuses to pay one can surmise that it is to destroy the fcc anoither government agency.I f the supreme court rules that the government can"t regulate private business then there is no longer a need for government bodies to regulate it.think of the possibilites,no limit on the amount of companies you can own in the entertainment industry,you can say and make up what you want to say at will.Good Republican strategy.

by liberalsrock (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 126 comments) on Tuesday, March 25, 2008 at 7:36:24 AM
 


Undergraduate degree in political science and philosophy: summa cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa; with postgraduate work in political economics. Postgraduate degree is a juris doctorate. I am a voracious reader and, although I make no claim to expertise, have self studied in logic, linguistics, theology, theoretical physics, macroeconomics, technical and fundamental market analysis, world history, and many other subjects, which I believed at the time helped explain the world around me.

...

to see more of bio, click on member name

W.M.L.Undergraduate degree in political science and philosophy: summa cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa; with postgraduate work in political economics. Postgraduate degree is a juris doctorate. I am a voracious reader and, although I make no claim to expertise, have self studied in logic, linguistics, theology, theoretical physics, macroeconomics, technical and fundamental market analysis, world history, and many other subjects, which I believed at the time helped explain the world around me.

...

to see more of bio, click on member name

COMMERCIALS

Why would the FCC worry over four letter words or naked buttocks when every third commercial is extolling the virtues of four hour erections, pills that make a man bigger where it counts, the best female sanitary device marketed that week, and the newest birth control pill on the market.  Does the FCC not have a mandate to also regulate commercial content until 10 p.m.?  I know I have to do a lot of explaining to my 9 year old.  Cussing and butts is the least of the problems for a father raising young children.  Explaining erectile disfunction, and why it seems so extremely important to adults, requires much more wisdom than laughing at naked butts.

by W.M.L. (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 387 comments) on Tuesday, March 25, 2008 at 2:37:47 PM
 

 

4 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Children dying in Haiti, victims of food crisis exacerbated by four devastating tropical storms Posted by Stephen Fox

Keith Olbermann Broke Up With Me! by Shannyn Moore

Study Confirms Genetically Modified Crops Threaten Human Fertility and Health Safety Posted by sadelaine

Surviving an Economic Crash: Resources and Tips by Kathryn Smith

Congress Opposes Bush Pardons by David Swanson

Home Depot Founder: Retailers Who Don't Support GOP "Should Be Shot" Posted by Joan Brunwasser

Fate of Lakotahs Highlights America's Failed Native American Policies by Stephen Lendman

The cholesterol - heart disease scam: How the medical-industrial complex is raking in billions at our expense by Richard Clark

A Turkey By Any Other Name--Is Still the Governor of Alaska by Brasch

Obama may choose Monsanto's GE-nightmare over an organic human vision by Linn Cohen-Cole

Go To Top 50 Most Popular