"China Must address Darfur" by Eliot Gould

"China must address Darfur" Why? What for? China needed Sudanese Crude oil supplies. They knocked on the Govt's door during office hours, made a generous offer and clinched the deal. Period! Compare this approach with the American, French and British approaches. First, they, through satellite imaging found Darfur floating on Oil reserves. They did not share this information with the Sudanese because Empires, 'expired' Empires as well as the only remaining Empire, are not in the business of dealing with Third World countries at par. They made no proposals, no offers like the Chinese did. They opted for something quite different. At the behest of their Oil Lobbies/Mafiosi, they planned, created, funded and protected a full blown insurgency in the Darfur Region based on time tested imperial policies of divide and rule, demonize and colonize, using the centuries old Darfur Divide between sheep + camel raising tribes and the agricultural tribes, based on disputed grazing lands and use of limited water resources. These age old and perennial bones of contention were blown out of proportion by Western Media paid to do so by the Western Oil Cartels. Money was no problem, PETRO DOLLARS! All sorts of myths were concocted. The Northern pastoral nomadic tribes were described as being Arabs whereas the Southern tribes were described as being Black and African. In fact ALL Darfurians are Arabs because ALL speak the Arabic language. ALL Darfurians are Black, the ones from the North are even blacker than those from the South. Thank God, ALL Darfurians are Muslims which made it a little difficult for the Evangelists and other US based Churches to use another divide, the religious divide in Darfur, like they did in Southern Sudan for 20 odd years, which conflict was also created, planned and funded by the US Oilies. Not that the American Churches did not try, they did, but they could not continue because no Darfurian would buy their End of the World Rapturist Come to Jesus Evangelism. The Oilies then encouraged and paid NGOs to create and sustain the GENOCIDE blietzkrieg! They found the going easy because the Sudanese Govt had bleeded itself to bankruptcy during the preceding 20 years of their Southern Secessionist Insurgency. Darfur would have been lost by Sudan forever had not  Almighty intervened in time. The Southern Insurgency came to an end and other black African countries saw through the divide and rule/ demonize and colonize RUSES at work in darfur, Chad and Niger! To stem the tide of the Darfurian Secessionist Insurgecy the only forces available to the Sudanese Govt were the Janjaweed, a camel mounted border guard force armed with World War II Royal Enfield 303 Rifles! This against AK47s, Uzis, M16's, rocket launchers etc smuggled to the insurgents by the Oilies through an obliging puppet Govt in Chad, which borders Darfur. The Sudanese had no Armed Forces left in Sudan, nor ordnance in their stores because of the earlier timely sanctions imposed by the West on Sudan. The Janjaweed did what they had to do to keep Sudan intact. What would America do to prevent Eliot Gould's new Mexico from seceeding from the United States? One can only guess in light of what the American Hordes are doing in Iraq!

In conclusion, it was America aided by Britain and France who have created this mess in Darfur. They and only they should clear this mess. Why should the Chinese be forced to help the Western Oilies out of their misadventure?          

by syed mahdi (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 125 comments) on Monday, August 13, 2007 at 4:51:11 PM
 

CIA Involvement in Darfur Goes Unreported - Should be taken

Dear OpEdNews colleague Eliot Gould,

I once worked on a documentary for an anniversary of the African Development Bank and although never was in Darfur, I was close enough to the Sudan border in Ethiopian and Kenya and have a spot in my heart for the magnificent people of this region. I just knocked out this article when I remembered, (I'm well into my 70s) of U.S. backing the rebels was never being factored in.
By the way, I wonder and ask you as someone more conversant on the Sudan than I, whether or not the U.S. is still actively supporting the rebellion{s}, either materially or diplomatically, either openly or secretly. sentimentally, morally and/or spiritually.?
Appreciativly in advance should you have time to read my article below, also orginally published by our OpEdNews, and comment,
Jay Janson

While there is great sorrow and indignation over the suffering and loss of life in the Sudan, early U.S. involvement in the war goes unmentioned. Instead, the U.S. leads an effort to condemn China for buying Sudan's oil. For years the U.S. had paid for war in hopes to arrange for some eventual control of the oil discovered in Darfur, (all well once well reported in the New York Times). The human crises receives modest financial aid from a U.S. government, silently protected from any embarrassment of acknowledging a prime complicity in fomenting war in Darfur.

HistoryNewNetwork, George Mason University republished the following from:
click here

"Early CIA Involvement in Darfur Has Gone Unreported"

http://hnn.us/roundup/entries/34473.html HNN Darfur

republished as well by Global Research, Operation Sudan of SaveDafur, UK IndyMedia, Ethiopian News, FreeThoughtManifesto, Islamic Forum, Countercurrents, Nicholas D. Kristof, Schema-Root news, jcturner23's reviews, NewsTrust,News Search Tracker, alfatomega, Newsvine, Digg, Netscape, Boreal Access, Newswire, Tailrank, Congo Music News, Zaire, mideastyouth.com, Darfur News from Google, ibrattleboro.com and sundry other sites from the original in OpEdNews, January 23, 2007

click here

There has been a glaring omission in the U.S. media presentation of the Darfur tragedy. The compassion demonstrated, mostly in words, until recently, has not been accompanied by a recognition of U.S. complicity, or at least involvement, in the war which has led to the enormous suffering and loss of life that has been taking place in Darfur for many years.

In 1978 oil was discovered in Southern Sudan. Rebellious war began five years later and was led by John Garang, who had taken military training at infamous Fort Benning, Georgia. "The US government decided, in 1996, to send nearly $20 million of military equipment through the 'front-line' states of Ethiopia, Eritrea and Uganda to help the Sudanese opposition overthrow the Khartoum regime." [Federation of American Scientists fas.org]

Between 1983 and the peace agreement signed in January 2005, Sudan's civil war took nearly two million lives and left millions more displaced. Garang became a First Vice President of Sudan as part of the peace agreement in 2005. From 1983, "war and famine-related effects resulted in more than 4 million people displaced and, according to rebel estimates, more than 2 million deaths over a period of two decades."
[CIA Fact Book -entry Sudan]

The BBC obituary of John Garang, who died in a plane crash shortly afterward, describes him as having "varied from Marxism to drawing support from Christian fundamentalists in the US." "There was always confusion on central issues such as whether the Sudan People's Liberation Army was fighting for independence for southern Sudan or merely more autonomy. Friends and foes alike found the SPLA's human rights record in southern Sudan and Mr Garang's style of governance disturbing." Gill Lusk - deputy editor of Africa Confidential and a Sudan specialist who interviewed the ex-guerrilla leader several times over the years was quoted by BBC, "John Garang did not tolerate dissent and anyone who disagreed with him was either imprisoned or killed."

CIA use of tough guys like Garang in Sudan, Savimbi in Angola, Mobutu in Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of the Congo), had been reported, even in mass media, though certainly not featured or criticized, but presently, this is of course buried away from public awareness and meant to be forgotten, as commercial media focuses on presenting the U.S. wars of today in a heroic light. It has traditionally been the chore of progressive, alternate and independent journalism to see that their deathly deeds supported by U.S. citizens tax dollars are not forgotten, ultimately not accepted and past Congresses and Presidents held responsible, even in retrospect, when not in real time.

Oil and business interests remain paramount and although Sudan is on the U.S. Government's state sponsors of terrorism list, the United States alternately praises its cooperation in tracking suspect individuals or scolds about the Janjaweed in Darfur. National Public Radio on May 2, 2005 had Los Angeles Times writer Ken Silverstein talk about his article "highlighting strong ties between the U.S. and Sudanese intelligence services, despite the Bush administration's criticism of human-rights violation in the Sudan." Title was "Sudan, CIA Forge Close Ties, Despite Rights Abuses." Nicholas Kristof, of The New York Times, won a 2006 Pulitzer Prize for "his having alerted this nation and the world to these massive crimes against humanity. He made six dangerous trips to Darfur to report names and faces of victims of the genocide for which President Bush had long before indicted the government of Sudan to the world's indifference." [Reuters] But last November saw the opening of a new U.S. consulate in Juba the capital of the Southern region. (Maybe consider this an example of "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em!" especially where oil is involved.)

The point is there is human suffering at mammoth level proportions. Humanitarian activists are trying to pry open the purse strings of an administration and congress willing to spend billions upon billions to get people killed and keep them in their place, namely, at our feet. Reminding Congress of what needs to be atoned for because of past policies of supporting war and human destruction could eventually make present policies of war intolerable. Americans are presently not exactly conscious stricken about dead and maimed Iraqis and Afghans, for commercial media always keeps of most of the human particulars of war crimes modestly out of sight, dramatizing much lesser losses and suffering of American military personal abroad.

Darfur made the headlines again because a governor of presidential timber was building up his foreign policy credentials. Meanwhile we are going to continue to see newsreels of our mass media depressing us with scenes of starving children, basically as testimony of how evil another Islamic nation's government is, so we can feel good - and want to purchase the products needing the advertising - which pays for the entertainment/news programs - which keep viewers in the dark about THEIR contribution to the suffering brought upon those people all the way over there in Africa.

Just try to put 4 and 2 million of anything into perspective. We are talking about an equivalent to the sets of eyes of half the population of Manhattan. Imagine one of us, whether a precious child ,a handsome man, a beautiful women, - to the tune of, (dirge of), one times four million, half of us dead. Sorry! It has no impact right? We realize that, remembering the words of Joseph Stalin (of all people), "One man's death is a tragedy, a thousand, is a statistic." There is absolutely no way we can whip up enough anguish to match a total of four million displaced and two million dead Sudanese, unless we could be of a mind and heart with Martin Luther King dealing with three million dead Vietnamese, also as in this case, over on the other side of the world, far from our living rooms - "So it is that those of us who are yet determined that "America will be" are led down the path of protest and dissent, working for the health of our land." (MLK, 1967, "Beyond Vietnam")

This writer remembers reading newspapers articles about the U.S. backing the Southern Sudan rebellion way back then. If we had supported a side that wound up winning, we would be bragging about our having supported 'freedom fighters'. But we just threw a lot of money and outdated weapons at a John Garang in the Sudan, as we did with Jonas Savimbi in Angola, to the ultimate destruction of millions of people, and they LOST! Like we did in Vietnam, and half-way lost in Korea, and now are mid-way losing in Iraq and Afghanistan. Jesus! Calculating the chances of an investment in human life and money coming to a fruition of sorts - that is certainly the job of any intelligence gathering agency! What we have had is an Agency using its gathered intelligence to do unintelligent things because, as our Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote more than a hundred and twenty-five years ago, "Things are in the saddle and ride herd over men" (trampling others under foot, we might add)

The European Union is under pressure from inside to assure that a United Nations force of 20,000 men will be sent to Darfur as required by Security Council resolution 1706, and to threaten sanctions in order to halt a war the U.S. was originally interested to see begun.

The U.N. Security Council will receive a list from the International Criminal Court of those Sudanese officials who could be charged with war crimes. The list is expected include some members of rebel organizations among Sudanese government officials and Janjaweed militias. There assuredly will be no names on the list of non-Sudanese officials of nations which were known to have involved themselves in this Sudanese civil war contrary to accepted provisions and obligations of U.N. membership. But we can know that the responsibility for war, slaughter, rape and theft in Sudan extends beyond the leaders of those murderously wielding guns and swords.

It will be good if outside influence will now be focused on peace, but citizens best be vigilant of their nation's foreign policy intentions. The world has heard many protestations that oil is not a reason for war, but blood and oil has been known to mix.
-------------------------- end of article-------------------

That now the U.S. use its economic power humanely, to promote peace in the Sudan and give generously to help war victims.

Appreciatively again in advance of possibly hearing something back on this from my colleague Eliot Gould, author of a nice article encouraging China to do more to help,
Jay Janson

by Jay Janson (74 articles, 0 quicklinks, 6 diaries, 87 comments) on Monday, August 13, 2007 at 5:03:13 PM