Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
July 25, 2006 at 21:52:44

View Ratings | Rate It

Divine Justice, but not for us, if Avante wins this lawsuit

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By Mercuri, Rebecca (about the author)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Rebecca Mercuri - Writer

Permission granted to OpEdNews to post the following in its entirety
with attribution to Rebecca Mercuri:

Colleagues,

I am writing to draw your attention to the Avante lawsuit that stands
poised to derail much of the VVPAT legislation that many have worked so
hard to put in place for the upcoming election cycles. In particular,
the Avante filing includes a request for damages, injunctive relief, a
jury trial, and asks that the Court enter a judgment that includes
(among other requested remedies):


1) Permanently enjoining the sale of all infringing equipment produced
by Diebold, Sequoia, and ES&S;
2) Recalling all infringing equipment;
3) Destroying or delivering to Avante the infringing equipment;
4) Awarding infringement damages to Avante including treble damages for
willful infringement.

Details can be found at:
http://www.votetrustusa.org/pdfs/avante/avante_complaint.pdf
http://www.votetrustusa.org/pdfs/avante/avante_complaint_exhibit_a.pdf
http://www.votetrustusa.org/pdfs/avante/avante_complaint_exhibit_b.pdf

The suit alleges that the infringements include both DREs and Opscan
equipment. Specifically mentioned are the Diebold AccuVote TS, AccuVote
TSX and AccuVote OS, the Sequoia AVC Edge, VeriVote Printer, AVC
Advantage, Optical Scan 400C and Optech Insight, and the ES&S iVotronic,
iVotronic LS, Real Time Audit Log, AutoMARK, Model 100 Precinct Ballot
Counter and the Model 650 Central Ballot Counter.

The ramifications of this lawsuit are such that VVPATs may not be
available in time to comply with the state laws, that the defendant
vendors may allow this lawsuit to further delay their certification
processes for the add-on ballot printers or other updated equipment, and
that municipalities might need to prepare for the possibility that their
opscan and DRE equipment may be decommissioned. I hope that you will
take the time to digest and disseminate this important information. If
further details are needed, I am available for comment.

Sincerely,
Rebecca Mercuri
mercuri (at) acm (dot) org
www.notablesoftware.com

 

http://www.notablesoftware.com

Rebecca Mercuri has been in the forefront of the voting integrity movement since 1989. She provides expert witness services for elections and other forensic computing matters.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "2006 Elections Law Voting"
Electoral Administration Act 2006: Elizabeth Ii, Chapter 22

$49.50

Number of pages: 146
Publisher: Stationery Office

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Corrected URLs for this article by Rebecca Mercuri on Thursday, Oct 5, 2006 at 10:26:44 AM
Further case sensitivity by Rebecca Mercuri on Thursday, Oct 5, 2006 at 10:30:35 AM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum