General News

Divine Justice, but not for us, if Avante wins this lawsuit

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

- Advertisement -
Permission granted to OpEdNews to post the following in its entirety
with attribution to Rebecca Mercuri:


I am writing to draw your attention to the Avante lawsuit that stands
poised to derail much of the VVPAT legislation that many have worked so
hard to put in place for the upcoming election cycles. In particular,
the Avante filing includes a request for damages, injunctive relief, a
jury trial, and asks that the Court enter a judgment that includes
(among other requested remedies):

1) Permanently enjoining the sale of all infringing equipment produced
by Diebold, Sequoia, and ES&S;
2) Recalling all infringing equipment;
3) Destroying or delivering to Avante the infringing equipment;
4) Awarding infringement damages to Avante including treble damages for
willful infringement.

Details can be found at:

The suit alleges that the infringements include both DREs and Opscan
equipment. Specifically mentioned are the Diebold AccuVote TS, AccuVote
TSX and AccuVote OS, the Sequoia AVC Edge, VeriVote Printer, AVC
Advantage, Optical Scan 400C and Optech Insight, and the ES&S iVotronic,
iVotronic LS, Real Time Audit Log, AutoMARK, Model 100 Precinct Ballot
Counter and the Model 650 Central Ballot Counter.
- Advertisement -

The ramifications of this lawsuit are such that VVPATs may not be
available in time to comply with the state laws, that the defendant
vendors may allow this lawsuit to further delay their certification
processes for the add-on ballot printers or other updated equipment, and
that municipalities might need to prepare for the possibility that their
opscan and DRE equipment may be decommissioned. I hope that you will
take the time to digest and disseminate this important information. If
further details are needed, I am available for comment.

Rebecca Mercuri
mercuri (at) acm (dot) org
- Advertisement -

Rebecca Mercuri has been in the forefront of the voting integrity movement since 1989. She provides expert witness services for elections and other forensic computing matters.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

National Popular Vote Returns to California

Homebuyer Stimulus Plan -- Won't Work -- Do the Math

Connecting the Dots? Rush Holt, HR 811, and Avante International

COTS and Other Electronic Voting Backdoors

Hawai'i's Instant Runoff Legislation -- Veto Needed

Trust the vote? Not in DC!


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

There appears to be a case-sensitivity issue with ... by Rebecca Mercuri on Thursday, Oct 5, 2006 at 10:26:44 AM
The OpEdNews website seems to want to change the c... by Rebecca Mercuri on Thursday, Oct 5, 2006 at 10:30:35 AM