Tags for This Article:

20 Most Courageous Dems (17)  20 Most Courageous Dems (17) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ;
Add to My Group
March 10, 2007 at 21:08:14

Congress Must Vote Down the Supplemental; The Only Way to End the War Is to Stop Funding It

by Dennis Kucinich (Posted by Nadia)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
 
Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

WASHINGTON, D.C. (March 1) — Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) called on Congress to oppose the Iraq supplemental appropriations bill, citing a 1999 federal court case, which states the only way to end a war is to cut the funding.

“A vote for the supplemental is a vote to reauthorize the war all over again,” Kucinich said. “Congress has constitutional authority to deny the President the authority to go to war and to cut off the funds and end this war. Each appropriations approval is a vote to continue the Iraq war.”

An 1999 U.S. District Court case has reemerged into the debate over Congress’ power to cut off funds and end the war. In the Campbell v. Clinton case 17 Member of Congress, including Kucinich, sued President Bill Clinton for unconstitutionally attacking Serbia without obtaining a declaration of war or other explicit authority from Congress. A war declaration by Congress is required by Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 of the Constitution.

The Court ruled in favor of the Administration because it could find no constitutional impasse existed between the Legislative and the Executive branch requiring judicial intervention. Congress had appropriated funds for the war and therefore chose not to remove U.S. forces. The significance of this case is that the court ruled the only way for Congress to end a war is to cut off funding.

“Congress can debate and pass legislation for redeployment, phased redeployment, a resolution to end the war or a non-binding resolution disapproving of the troop surge. But none of this will have any legal effect. Each and every time Congress voted for a supplemental bill, they voted to reauthorize the war all over again,” Kucinich said.

The supplemental appropriations bill is scheduled to be voted on by the House of Representatives soon.

“The Administration does not have to pay any attention to Congress’ attempt to guide the war. Once Congress gave its consent for military action, it did not have the authority to steer the conduct of the war. Now, the only option Congress has to end the war is to withdraw approval for the war through a cut off of funds,” Kucinich said.
“The Campbell case makes it obvious that as long as Congress continues to fund the war, it cannot simultaneously argue that it’s being usurped with respect to the war powers.

“Each appropriations vote gives the President implied consent to continue the war. That is why Congress needs to take a stand and vote down the supplemental. ”

 

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 comments

Nadia is an online activist interested in using the miracle of the internet to save our country before it is too late.
NadiaNadia is an online activist interested in using the miracle of the internet to save our country before it is too late.

Also see Dennis' writings at huffingtonpost

There is Only One Way to End The War in Iraq

click here for President Volunteer Organizing Site
click here

by Nadia (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 49 comments) on Saturday, March 10, 2007 at 10:14:37 PM
 


Mark A. Goldman is an activist, author, financial planner and recent unsuccessful Candidate for Congress.
Mark A. GoldmanMark A. Goldman is an activist, author, financial planner and recent unsuccessful Candidate for Congress.

On taking a stand

If you're interested in Congress taking a stand, that stand has to start with you?  You have the ability without permission from anyone else to enter articles of impeachment and you have refused.  That would be called taking a stand.  You have talked around the subject but you haven't actually told the truth out loud, which is this:  Bush et. al have committed crimes and impeachable offenses.  Lot's of them.  And if you haven't the courage to stand on your own two feet and say even that simple truth, I don't think you have the moral authority to say what Congress should do.  You are Congress.  You took an oath of office.  Live up to it.

by Mark A. Goldman (81 articles, 2 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 243 comments) on Sunday, March 11, 2007 at 10:52:40 AM
 

 

2 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Children dying in Haiti, victims of food crisis exacerbated by four devastating tropical storms Posted by Stephen Fox

Keith Olbermann Broke Up With Me! by Shannyn Moore

Study Confirms Genetically Modified Crops Threaten Human Fertility and Health Safety Posted by sadelaine

Surviving an Economic Crash: Resources and Tips by Kathryn Smith

Congress Opposes Bush Pardons by David Swanson

Home Depot Founder: Retailers Who Don't Support GOP "Should Be Shot" Posted by Joan Brunwasser

The cholesterol - heart disease scam: How the medical-industrial complex is raking in billions at our expense by Richard Clark

Fate of Lakotahs Highlights America's Failed Native American Policies by Stephen Lendman

A Turkey By Any Other Name--Is Still the Governor of Alaska by Brasch

Obama may choose Monsanto's GE-nightmare over an organic human vision by Linn Cohen-Cole

Go To Top 50 Most Popular