Impeachment is no longer needed because:
Bush has forfeited his Right and Title to Office, and his citizenship by his unlawful action of receiving and retaining gifts from foreign powers.
George W. Bush is no longer President of the United States as a matter of law.
"Ignorantia Legis Neminem Excusat",
Ignorance of the law excuses no one. 4 Bouv. Inst. No. 3828; 1 Story, Eq. Jur. § 111; 7 Watts, 374.
In all judicial proceedings every man, it is said, is presumed to know the law of the land, which absolutely does not exclude any judicial officer or public officer or de facto officer or anyone operating under color of law.
______________________________________
The jewel embedded toilet bag that Tony Blair gave Bush has done more for the People of the United States that the current Congress has.
Titles of Nobility Act (TONA) reads as follows:
"If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them."

Note that there is no exception for the President of the United States to this law.
After having unlawfully retained the toilet bag, which is worth over $700, and having thereby forfeited his American citizenship and his Right and title to Office by so doing, George W. Bush is subject as an alien to: click here

In the eyes of the law, this is a time of peace, because the Congress has failed to declare War. George Bush has declared War, but he has no Authority to do so. The Congress has pretended to grant him such authority, but that can be of no force or validity, because the Duty to declare War is charged to the Congress by Article 1, and it is not within the specifically enumerated Powers of the Congress to legislate such a fundamental Constitutional change, but rather requires ratification as a Constitutional Amendment to be of any force or validity.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:S.3930:
http://www.buzzle.com/editorials/7-14-2003-42952.asp

Since Condoleza Rice is the person responsible for the reporting of gifts to be turned in, I am certain that there are improprieties in that reporting, and such things as the following warrant scrutiny:
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0805-06.htm
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/08/03/1091476498746.html?from=storylhs