Mr. President: Despite fantasy media projections -- imagining you the reincarnated Harry Truman -- stubborn, historical reality intervenes. Balderdash. Viewed simply as one strong leader commanding your own fate, you're far short of JFK, LBJ, or Bill Clinton. If similar to any modern Democrat, it's misguided, beleaguered Jimmy Carter -- whose high rhetoric was likewise crushed when power politics unearthed rank inexperience.
But the second coming of pugnacious, risk-taking, courageous Truman? Dream on. Neither in style nor substance do you approximate give-'em-hell Harry -- not how you barely assail foes, nor fail to defend majority interest; not by taking risks and certainly not by getting your way. Frankly, Barry, you're not giving anyone hell, certainly not the fringe -- only indigestion to distraught left-wingers sniffing for alternatives. And no violins, please, about onerous political inheritances. Was yours worse than taking over for the legendary FDR, ending a world war, rebuilding the western world, confronting nuclear arms, communist blockades and the Cold War, or battling domestic economic upheavals plus headstrong right-wingers?
No way. Awash with monumental threats, Truman refused to cave, nor stagger from dread of defeat. He took chances, even risked what you value over all -- re-election. Truman pushed a bold, costly Marshall Plan against high resistance, proposed a (failed) universal health plan than shames Obamacare, challenged economic royalists, and desegregated the military -- offending racists everywhere, especially Dixie Democrats.
Like Carter, you obliterated your own vital narratives, estranged Main Street by not rocking entrenched boats -- even today still brandishing the absurd notion that bury-the-difference bipartisanship works. You can't even leverage the bully pulpit against truly sadistic bullies, despite the Grand Canyon-sized openings they leave. Let's see, 1) Repugs willingly sacrifice America to defeat a "foreign" president, 2) offer zero jobs programs (except LESS taxes, rights and deregulation) and 3) whose bizarre answer to Wall Street "booboos," Gulf oil "leaks," or mining "accidents" is MORE glorified free-market chaos. That's a guarantee for universal fairness and safety, plus health and pension programs!
Think how feisty, confrontational Truman would have feasted on such obscene vulgarities. Like FDR, not only didn't he fear the hatred of plutocrats, he welcomed it. Of course, Truman was not flawless, nor immune from overheated chauvinism: in 1941, soon after Nazi Germany attacked Russia, he said, "If we see that Germany is winning we ought to help Russia and, if Russia is winning we ought to help Germany. And that way let them kill as many as possible, although I don't want to see Hitler victorious under any circumstances." You don't have to be a saint, Barry, to be a solid, populist bulldog, or a Democrat untarnished with Republican "compromise."
The folksy, no-nonsense Truman is not hard to find, in print when in office. He dramatically fired a very popular general (Douglas MacArthur) "because he wouldn't respect the authority of the president . . . I didn't fire him because he was a dumb son of a b*tch, although he was, but that's not against the law for generals. If it was, half to three-quarters of them would be in jail." Right, in jail, like banksters. Contrast how timid Obama dismissed his subversive general, Stanley McChrystal -- with effusive praise?
Then, after blowhard MacArthur received a hero's welcome, even an invitation to address a fuming Congress, Truman eviscerated his blather as "a bunch of damn bullshit." Comically, Truman once ridiculed an unkind music critic of his daughter's singing with this mock-heroic: if we ever meet, "you'll need a new nose, a lot of beefsteak for black eyes, and perhaps a supporter below!" Would Obama once imperil foes out to utterly destroy him -- even turn genuine growls into actual bites? Not hardly.
Nor can anyone conceive Obama campaigning AGAINST fat cat donors, as did Truman, indicting them as "gluttons of privilege" who'd spend "fabulous sums of money" to elect Republicans. No sir, Truman cultivated savvy belligerence, not caving to enemies: "Carry the battle to them. Don't let them bring it to you. Put them on the defensive and don't ever apologize for anything." Beyond your hearing, Barry?
In Wit, No Comparison
Truman displayed public wit that escapes you: "I remember when I first came to Washington. For the first six months you wonder how the hell you ever got here. For the next six months you wonder how the hell the rest of them ever got here." Nor did he spare himself, "All the president is, is a glorified public relations man who spends his time flattering, kissing, and kicking people to get them to do what they are supposed to do anyway." Even more so, "If I hadn't been President of the United States, I probably would have ended up a piano player in a bawdy house."
Equally keen on human nature, Truman dissected Rep. Richard Nixon: he's "a no good, lying bastard. He can lie out of both sides of his mouth at the same time, and if he ever caught himself telling the truth, he'd lie just to keep his hand in." Nor did Truman sanctify his own sacred cows, quipping: the Marine Corps is the "Navy's police force and as long as I am President that is what it will remain. They have a propaganda machine that is almost equal to Stalin's."
Last week, Mr. President, you growled but failed (again) to restore smashed confidence or fight off today's cowards, bullies, and criminals. When will you realize, if ever, that "malefactors of great wealth" hijacked your populist-sounding campaign, thanks to badly-chosen advisers and enemies misread? Here's Truman, by the way, on your favorite tactic: "Whenever a fellow tells me he's bipartisan, I know he's going to vote against me."
Are you fool or knave not to understand that overt distortion of debt collateral is real fraud, not some chance "abusive practices" that got us into this in the first place? Only willful blindness concludes the entire "sub-prime lending fiasco" involved "a lot of that stuff" that wasn't "necessarily illegal, it was just immoral or inappropriate or reckless"? OMG. To ignore lawbreaking is criminal negligence, exacerbated by your defending banksters as "very creative and they are always looking for ways to make money. That's their job." Say what? Not when "breaking the country," as Elizabeth Warren puts it, translation: enrichment by corruption.
Truman: Push Only Big Plans
Think how Truman would skewer such creative "sons of b*tches" just doing "their job." Far more than you, Truman understood leadership -- and political leverage -- vs. your reactive drift from crisis to crisis. Or your typical style, coming late to the game, as with gay rights and gay marriage. What I see often is fulfillment of what your own staffer (on Libya) deemed "leading from behind." Quite so. Even slow-witted Sarah Palin knows what "backassward" means
1 | 2