Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
May 17, 2009 at 13:04:59

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 5/17/09:

Yes We Can Say No to Torture

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Rowan Wolf (about the author)     Page 1 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Rowan Wolf - Writer

Not only CAN we say "No" to torture, we MUST say "No" to torture. Much of the torture "debate" has focused around the policies, legitimation, and use of torture under the Bush Administration. President Obama has repeatedly stated that he thinks that torture does not reflect our values. Indeed, he has said the he "believes" that waterboarding is torture. However, since taking office, he has increasingly shifted his rhetoric to "soften" the issue of torture. He increasingly refers to "enhanced interrogation." In his press conference marking his first hundred days in office, he referred to torture as a "shortcut." This conceptual and linguistic shifting is more than worrisome - it is downright alarming.

In the 100 days press conference (April 30, 2009), President Obama responded to Jake Tapper's question "Torture is a violation of international law and the Geneva Conventions. Do you believe that the previous administration sanctioned torture?" was a follows (transcript courtesy of The Huffington Post) :

What I've said -- and I will repeat -- is that waterboarding violates our ideals and our values. I do believe that it is torture. I don't think that's just my opinion; that's the opinion of many who've examined the topic. And that's why I put an end to these practices.


I am absolutely convinced it was the right thing to do, not because there might not have been information that was yielded by these various detainees who were subjected to this treatment, but because we could have gotten this information in other ways, in ways that were consistent with our values, in ways that were consistent with who we are.

I was struck by an article that I was reading the other day talking about the fact that the British during World War II, when London was being bombed to smithereens, had 200 or so detainees. And Churchill said, "We don't torture," when the entire British -- all of the British people were being subjected to unimaginable risk and threat.

And then the reason was that Churchill understood, you start taking short-cuts, over time, that corrodes what's -- what's best in a people. It corrodes the character of a country.

And -- and so I strongly believed that the steps that we've taken to prevent these kinds of enhanced interrogation techniques will make us stronger over the long term and make us safer over the long term because it will put us in a -- in a position where we can still get information.

In some cases, it may be harder, but part of what makes us, I think, still a beacon to the world is that we are willing to hold true to our ideals even when it's hard, not just when it's easy.

At the same time, it takes away a critical recruitment tool that Al Qaida and other terrorist organizations have used to try to demonize the United States and justify the killing of civilians.

And it makes us -- it puts us in a much stronger position to work with our allies in the kind of international, coordinated intelligence activity that can shut down these networks.

So this is a decision that I'm very comfortable with. And I think the American people over time will recognize that it is better for us to stick to who we are, even when we're taking on an unscrupulous enemy.


I would agree with President Obama that the use of torture and the abuse of prisoners "erodes our character." However, I strongly disagree with his seemingly tacit acceptance of the framing that torture is an efficient way of getting information. In using the word "shortcuts" in relationship to torture, he is essentially saying: "There are two ways of getting necessary information from a prisoner. There are legal interrogation methods, and there is torture. Torture will get to the information quicker, but we are too good a people to use it." In other words, there are times when torture may be used.

This perception is reinforced by Obama's repeated response to the Bush administration use of "enhanced interrogation techniques" as a "mistake." In other words, "There is a place and a time for torture, they just made a poor choice."

In the press conference analysis by Olbermann and Maddow, Maddow captures some key points of concern by stating:

I thought his (Obama's) framing of the issue was surprising. He was sort of accepting (I thought) of the sort of Jack Bauer (of the Fox show 24) Dick Cheney framing of the issue in a way that I think liberals will be very disappointed in.


Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

www/uncommonthought.com/mtblog/

Rowan Wolf is an activist and sociologist living in Oregon. She is the founder and principle author of Uncommon Thought Journal, and a Senior Editor for more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Abuse Of Power Accountability"
Citizens' Rights, Judges and State Accountability
by A. G. Noorani

$35.00
Lowest New Price $27.94

Number of pages: 384
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

I encourage you by Rowan Wolf on Sunday, May 17, 2009 at 1:07:42 PM
Yes we can if we will by iane abot on Monday, May 18, 2009 at 2:57:14 AM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum