Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   3 comments

General News

XL Pipeline: Sen. Whitehouse and Rep. Waxman Question Koch Bros

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 4/5/14

Become a Fan
  (1 fan)


(image by RVR Associates)
As a writer on environmental issues, as well as a person concerned about the future of the planet, I am anxiously awaiting the decision on the XL Pipeline. I keep questioning if the United States is ready to set an example by eliminating fossil fuel extraction as integral to American life. Will we get down to the hard work of moving forward on a different path?

With all the recent news about oils spills and the 25th anniversary of the Exxon Valdez disaster--you have to wonder about the advisability of 1660 miles of pipeline transversing the nation. It will be transporting 830,000 barrels of oil on a daily basis from the Canadian Alberta oil sands to the refineries of the beleaguered city of Port Arthur (home to several refineries, chemical plants, and an incinerator). I have written about the abysmal lack of environmental justice for the indigenous communities in Canada and the low-income urban victims in Port Arthur.

There are constantly new sidebars in the debate. One was about the contractor who compiled the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), and if there was a conflict of interest stemming from a prior relationship with TransCanada. Allegations aside, the EIS did make note of "elevated levels of carcinogen and mercury" that would be emitted into the air and acknowledged the "difficulty" of cleaning up potential spills.

On their page about the Keystone Pipeline, the U. S. State Department puts forth that it is considering the application from TransCanada Corporation based on numerous factors "including" foreign policy concerns, economics, energy security, health and the environment.

When I looked at the comments from the public (close to 125,000), it was clear on why those who were opposed to the pipeline had weighed in. Their apprehensions referenced the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, finding alternative sources of energy, the abuse of eminent domain, and the impact on populations of color.

The pro-pipeline comments skewed to job creation and energy security. A majority of them used identical language stating, "I'm writing to encourage you to approve the construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline as quickly as possible."

Okay. So each side is mobilizing in their own manner. Yet I couldn't help thinking of those rote answers when I read the press release from the offices of Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-CA) and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), which released a letter they had sent to Koch Industries. It specifically asked if their business or affiliated companies had "financial interests" in the pipeline.

Addressed to David L. Robertson, the President and COO of Koch Industries, the letter (available online) continued with the following paragraph:

"Groups backed by Charles and David Koch have lobbied and run political ads to support construction of the pipeline.  But Koch Industries has consistently denied financial motives played any role in these activities, asserting that the Keystone XL pipeline has 'nothing to do with any of our businesses.'  We want to know whether this is true."

The letter points to Americans for Prosperity, which was founded by David Koch, as having "run a multi-year pressure campaign in favor of the Keystone XL pipeline, including airing ads against members of Congress for opposing the pipeline." It goes on to underscore the Koch financial connection to entities seeking to dismiss the science that has emphasized "the relationship between the use of carbon-based fuel and climate change."

Waxman and Whitehouse present eleven detailed questions, along with requests for documentation. Some of the points covered are:

The number of leases, acres, and exploratory wells held by Koch Industries or it subsidiaries in Alberta, Canada.

Current and expected levels of production expected from lands leased in Alberta, Canada.

Potential impact that the passage of the pipeline would have on the value of their lease holdings.

Connection between the amount of oil coming from the Canadian tar sands and the amount that is processed at Koch Industries/subsidiaries refineries.

Connection between the amount of oil coming from the Canadian tar sands and the amount that is "purchased, shipped, or exported yearly" by Koch Industries/subsidiaries.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://www.mgyerman.com

Marcia G. Yerman is a writer, activist, artist and curator based in New York City. Her articles--profiles, interviews, reporting and essays--focus on women's issues, the environment, human rights, the arts and culture. Her writing has been published (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Keystone Pipeline Is An Environmental Justice Issue

"ExxonMobil Hates Your Children" and This Ad

New EPA Chief Gina McCarthy Targets Climate Change

Urge Pepsi To Stop Guzzling Tar Sands!

"Homeland" Probes Terrorism and the Existential Threat

Virginia's Wayne Powell: An Environmental Profile In Courage

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The Koch Bros have been using their millions to re... by Marcia G. Yerman on Saturday, Apr 5, 2014 at 6:53:17 AM
It would be nice, and, no doubt, helpful to see a... by John Sanchez Jr. on Saturday, Apr 5, 2014 at 8:32:03 AM
Don't hold your breath for a response....Just expe... by Dennis Kaiser on Sunday, Apr 6, 2014 at 6:57:39 AM