OpEdNews Op Eds

Writer Misrepresented the War Powers Resolution on OEN

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

John Nichols began his article with this statement; " President Obama failed to seek a declaration of war before ordering US attacks on Libya. Now, he faces a challenge under the War Powers Resolution. " That is quite true. However, it is not an immediate challenge to the President. He has sixty days according to the WPR and the clock started on March 19th when coalition forces began their air attacks on Gaddafi's armed forces.

That is not exactly a misrepresentation of the WPR, but a clarification to Mr. Nichols' remark was deemed necessary. His misrepresentation occurs later in the third paragraph of his article entitled, "A War Powers Challenge to Obama's Libya Project."

He stated, " The War Powers Resolution, enacted in the late stages of the Vietnam War over a veto by President Richard Nixon, requires the commander-in-chief to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action that he or she determines is necessary in the face of "a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.' " Emphasis is mine and represents the focal point of Mr. Nichols' misrepresentation. He combined, thus misconstrued, two separate paragraphs within the WPR.

With respect to the 48 hours here is what the WPR actually says under the heading, "Reporting requirement:"

The President shall submit within 48 hours to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and to the President pro tempore of the Senate a report, in writing, setting forth--

(A) the circumstances necessitating the introduction of United States Armed Forces;

(B) the constitutional and legislative authority under which such introduction took place; and

(C) the estimated scope and duration of the hostilities or involvement.

Essentially, that is all it says about the 48-hour requirement. There is nothing about a national emergency or a direct attack on the United States. That particular language is in an entirely different section within the WPR and in a totally different context.

That language is in the first part of the WPR under the heading, "Purpose and policy." The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to

(1) a declaration of war,

(2) specific statutory authorization, or

(3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its           armed forces.

The gritty details of carrying out these provisions are contained later in the WPR mostly in the "Reporting requirement" section mentioned above as it pertains to the President. By combining two disparate statements into one, Mr. Nichols provided to readers a misleading view of the WPR.

I have only the deepest respect for Mr. Nichols. This article is a product of that respect. It is not meant as censure or criticism.  

 

I am the author of two novels, "The Bode Testament" and "Impeachment." I am also a columnist who keeps a wary eye on other columnists and the failures of the MSM (mainstream media). I was born in Minnesota, and, to this day, I love the Vikings (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

America Divided

Classic military blunders

Expanded Presidential "War" Power: a Time-Bomb Threatening Our Democracy

What Exactly Is COIN?

War With Iran Imminent?

The Trilogy of Despair as Bin Laden Dances in His Cave

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Since the Libya military involvement clearly invol... by Bill Samuel on Sunday, Apr 24, 2011 at 10:04:41 PM
Now that is an interesting argument. I don't agree... by Sandy Shanks on Monday, Apr 25, 2011 at 5:57:36 PM