The Supreme Court's Citizens United decision has left the sewer door open and the rats are getting bolder and bolder.
It could only a matter of time before corporatist hubris reaches a point where corporations will feel entitled to require branding on human bodies.
Look at what's happening in Australia.
Sales of cigarettes in Australia were about $10.4 billion in 2009,
Reuters reports l, and they add, " Smoking-related illnesses kill more than 15,000 Australians each year and cost the economy A$31.5 billion in health costs, according to Australian government health authorities."
The Aussie government has passed a law that requires that most of the cigarette package be covered with warnings and ugly images of cancer, bulging eyes, the most unappealing green colors. The manufacturer's branding will be allowed only on a small part of the package, in smaller letters.
flickr image
By foboat, with caption: Australian Dunhills
Philip Morris company has responded with a lawsuit, complaining that this will hurt the value of their trademarks and their profits and have suggested that the losses they sue for could be in the billions.
The Philip Morris company is basing its damage threats on Australia's bilateral investment treaty with Hong Kong. That treaty, similar to ones the US has signed, like the WTO, holds the Australian government responsible to protect Hong Kong investments in Australia.
To fight the legislation, Philip Morris run ads accusing the Australian government of being a "nanny state."
If they don't get satisfaction after three months, they will seek arbitration through the United Nations.
You have to wonder what will come next. Will Philip Morris go to the Supreme Court of the United States, and claiming rights of free speech that come with corporate personhood, ask the five corrupt, corpo-whores on the court to void laws prevent advertising of cigarettes on television?
Or why not go further? Perhaps they'll put small print--and let's face it, nobody every reads the terms of use legal talk on websites, software, etc.-- on tickets on stadiums they own, making people agree to get tattoos on their throats or wherever. Yes I'm stretching things. But could you imagine, just a few years ago, a corporation going to the supreme court and overturning almost a century's laws protecting the sanctity of the vote.
The utter scum in the Supreme Court have proven themselves willing to give big corporations almost anything they ask for. What the hell. Clarence Thomas' wife will get paid. Scalia will accept trips and hunting excursion and speaking invitations that scream conflict of interest.
So maybe I'm over the top on the tattoos, but the idea of rolling back regulations of advertising of tobacco and other things banned from TV-- get used to it. We really should be changing the name of the nation to the CSA-- Corporate States of America.
Will the Democrats do anything about this CSA situation? Don't hold your breath waiting.
Will Obama do anything about it? My guess is he'll consult with his advisors. Oh, that's right. They're all corpo-whores. Good luck.
Here's a very partial list of some of the Brands Philip Morris Owns. A more complete list is
here. tobacco products
Marlboro
Virginia Slims
Merit
Parliament
Benson &Hedges
L&M
Chesterfield
Lark
Cambridge
Basic
foods and beverages:
Capri Sun
Country Time
Crystal Light
Kool-Aid
Tang
General Foods International Coffees
Gevalia
Maxim
Maxwell House
Sanka
Cool Whip
Dream Whip
Jell-O
Philadelphia and Kraft Cheeses
Cream of Wheat
Grape Nuts
Oreos
Raisin Bran
Shredded Wheat
Chips Ahoy
Ritz crackers
Life Savers
Velveeta
Breyers Yoghurt
Stove Top
Miracle Whip
Oscar Mayer
Claussen
DiGiorno and Tombstone Pizzas
Fleischmann's
Kraft Lunchables
This is a small portion of the brands the own. the brands they are trying to stuff the branding of down the throats of the Australian people in spite of laws democratically elected officials have enacted.
international treaties should not be allowed to over-ride national or even state or provincial laws. Period.
They are designed to protect corporations before humans and that's just wrong.
Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), President of Futurehealth, Inc, inventor . He is also published regularly on the Huffingtonpost.com
With his experience as architect and founder of a technorati top 100 blog, he is also a new media / social media consultant and trainer for corporations, non-profits, entrepreneurs and authors.
Rob is a frequent Speaker on the bottom up revolution, politics, The art, science and power of story, heroes and the hero's journey, Positive Psychology, Stress, Biofeedback and a wide range of subjects. He is a campaign consultant specializing in tapping the power of stories for issue positioning, stump speeches and debates, and optimizing tapping the power of new media. He recently retired as organizer of several conferences, including StoryCon, the Summit Meeting on the Art, Science and Application of Story and The Winter Brain Meeting on neurofeedback, biofeedback, Optimal Functioning and Positive Psychology. See more of his articles here and, older ones, here.
To learn more about me and OpEdNews.com, check out
A Voice For Truth - ROB KALL | OM Times Magazine and this article.And there are
Rob's quotes, here.
To Watch me on youtube, having a lively conversation with John Conyers, Chair of the House Judiciary committee, click
here Now, wouldn't you like to see me on the political news shows, representing progressives. If so, tell your favorite shows to bring me on and refer them to this youtube video
My radio show, The Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show, runs 9-10 PM EST Wednesday evenings, on AM 1360, WNJC and is archived at
www.opednews.com/podcasts Or listen to it streaming, live at
www.wnjc1360.com
Rob also host a health/mind/body/heart/spirit radio show-- the Rob Kall Futurehealth radio show. Check out podcasts from it at
futurehealth.org/podcastsFollow me on Twitter
A few declarations.
-While I'm registered as a Democrat, I consider myself to be a dynamic critic of the Democratic party, just as, well, not quite as much, but almost as much as I am a critic of republicans.
-My articles express my personal opinion, not the opinion of this website.
Recent press coverage in the Wall Street Journal:
Party's Left Pushes for a Seat at the Table