Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
7 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Women and Firemen First: 5 Ideas for Sequestration Cuts

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Interesting 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to None 3/4/13

Become a Fan
  (7 fans)

opednews.com


by SMU Central University Libraries

Leading up to the March 1 deadline, the White House and President Obama's cabinet have filled the press with dire warnings of the mayhem that will result if the budget sequester goes into effect.   As usual, his cronies in the Main-Stream Media are helping him spread the panic.

Never mind that the President himself proposed sequestration as a backup plan to get Congress to raise the debt ceiling in 2011.   The Administration assures us that these across-the-board budget "cuts" (which aren't really cuts at all, but merely reduced levels of spending increases) will cause mayhem and prevent the government from providing essential services.


President Barack Obama warns of dire consequences over spenfing "cuts." by Marc Nozell/Wikimedia Commons

In early 2011, the Executive Branch had maxed out its credit cards and the Republicans in Congress wouldn't raise the debt limit, supposedly in the name of fiscal responsibility.   Eventually, a compromise was reached: the debt ceiling was raised, but a bipartisan "Super Congress" would be formed to develop recommendations for reducing the government's rate of growth in the future.   These recommendations would be submitted to Congress for approval without amendments or delays, and everything would be fine.   But just in case something went wrong, a schedule was adopted that imposed across-the-board limits on the rate of growth of federal spending from Fiscal Year 2013 to Fiscal Year 2021 (the "sequester").  

Unfortunately, Congress did not approve the Super Congress's plan, and after two extensions, it's finally time for the sequester to kick in.   As a result, the skillful political compromise of yesteryear has become an American nightmare, and the Administration is screaming bloody murder.

In order to get around the spending limits, President Obama resorted to a time-honored technique: the "Firemen-First" principle.   In fact, this tactic is so old, it was first identified by Charles Peters of the Washington Monthly back in 1976.   As Ivan Eland explains it, the Firemen-First principle works like this:

When agencies smell budget cuts in the air, they threaten to cut their most essential, popular, or politically defensible programs first - for example, money for fighting fires - to dissuade politicians from cutting their budgets.   The military is no exception.

Therefore, as a public service, the following suggestions are offered as starting points to help the President find real cuts that won't drag America into the abyss.


This General Atomics MQ-1 Predator drone is in a Belgrade museum. by David Orlovic/Wikimedia Commons

1.   Roll back the unmanned aerial vehicle program (a.k.a. "drones")

Do we really need that new drone base in Niger?    Aren't the ones we already have in Ethiopia and Djibouti enough, or do we really have to threaten every square inch of the African continent?   And while we're at it, maybe we could stop the drone strikes in Pakistan, too.   Obviously, the President won't consider it a benefit to save the lives of dozens of women and children, and stop wounding literally hundreds of innocent civilians.   After all, those foreigners don't represent a cost to his Administration.   But with the money saved from ending the drone strikes, maybe we could afford to deploy that second aircraft-carrier group to the Middle East, after all.

Then there are all the drones the federal government plans to roll out here in the U.S.   According to the President, "We respect and have a whole bunch of safeguards in terms of how we conduct counterterrorism operations outside of the United States. The rules outside of the United States are going to be different than the rules inside the United States, in part because our capacity, for example, to capture terrorists in the United States are very different than in the foothills or mountains of Afghanistan or Pakistan."   Of course, we will never know what those safeguards are, because that's a state secret.   Maybe the best safeguard would be to stop buying them in the first place.

Oh, sure, the Unmanned Systems Caucus will complain about their loss of untold billions and billions of dollars in contracts.   And a few Medal of Valor contenders in Nevada will have to be retrained to do something worthwhile.   But with sequestration, there just isn't as much pork in the barrel these days, so we're all going to have to live lower on the hog.


A joint U.S./French task force is underway in the Arabian Gulf. by U.S. Navy/Wikimedia Commons

2.   Roll back the American world empire

Now, about that second carrier group the Administration wants to deploy to the Middle East: why?   Aren't we ending the war in Afghanistan, and isn't the war in Iraq already over?   So, if one carrier group was enough to fight both those wars, why do we need to deploy a second one now?

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Alan Pyeatt is an award-winning Civil Engineer who lives in Monrovia, California. He also enjoys music, organic gardening, economics, and audio/video production.
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Look at Libertarian Party Nominees Gary Johnson, Jim Gray

Will Obama Support Internet Freedom in his Second Term?

The Real Lessons of Pearl Harbor

Happy Bill of Rights Day, America

Are Sin Taxes an Example of the Tyranny of the Majority?

The Real Lessons of Pearl Harbor, Part 2

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 7 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

If we were talking about a private company inste... by Alan Pyeatt on Monday, Mar 4, 2013 at 5:18:42 PM
LMAO, shut up & pay your taxes, slave. :-)... by Darren Wolfe on Monday, Mar 4, 2013 at 7:57:58 PM
while considering money wasted in foreign aid, don... by j dial on Monday, Mar 4, 2013 at 5:19:22 PM
and over $3 Billion per year until 2017. And of co... by Alan Pyeatt on Tuesday, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:48:10 PM
Sorry if this has already been mentioned.  To... by Suzana Megles on Wednesday, Mar 6, 2013 at 4:12:26 PM
Almost all economists agree that in a recession, w... by Alan Pyeatt on Wednesday, Mar 6, 2013 at 5:07:56 PM
How about besides cutting their salaries in line w... by June Genis on Wednesday, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:36:59 PM