Exclusive to OpEdNews:
Life Arts

Wishing for a New Lincoln

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com


Imagine, my eyes moist as the U.S. Congress does the right thing. Pride in a U.S. president as he puts the hammer down to get his way.

Not over anything going on today, of course. I was viewing Stephen Spielberg's " Lincoln ". The film centers on just a few months in the fight in the U.S. House to pass the 13th amendment that would abolish slavery. I had not realized how close the issue was. The "Emancipation Proclamation" only freed slaves in the areas under rebellion and might have been overturned by the Supreme Court. Lincoln wanted a Constitutional Amendment to set it in stone and he tried to do it with a lame-duck Congress. He was in a hurry because once the war ended he feared the restored southern state governments would block the amendment.

The movie has been criticized because it makes the struggle seem as if the victory was all due to the efforts of white politicians and ignores all the efforts of abolitionist blacks like Frederick Douglass, the black general strike among Southern slaves, etc. Point made.

Still the movie begins with two black soldiers talking about how after the rebels massacred captured "Negro" soldiers after a battle, in the next battle blacks made sure there were no Confederate prisoners. Thaddeus Stevens, the most "radical" of Radical Republicans, is shown in a very positive light, and at the end of the movie there's a surprise scene of interracial affection. This is not your grandfather's Lincoln.

My trouble is not with the movie or the real Lincoln, but for the people who think what Lincoln was doing in 1865 is directly relevant to what's going on today. The movie is supposedly based on the book "Team of Rivals" by Doris Goodwin, who writes about Lincoln's perfect timing as he waged war and abolished slavery. She argues that immediate application of Radical-Republican ideas might have driven away the border states and led the Union to lose the war. Seems right.

Obama famously said he would model his cabinet and politics after the "team" described by Goodwin. But instead of using presidential power and Lincoln-like brilliant timing to push through something grand and century-defining he rebuilt the Wall Street casino, encouraged the "Drill Baby Drill" carbon criminals, and stood squarely, "unshakably" with Israeli apartheid. Yet, the screenwriter of "Lincoln", the playwright Tony Kushner, has said Obama is a "great president".

Give me a break.

Kushner also told an NPR reviewer that Lincoln would have treated the defeated South in a "humane" way and thus prevented the "bitterness" that led to the rise of the Klan. I haven't heard that dumb-ass notion in 50 years. It's history in the wrong order. The Klan arose right after the Civil War to terrorize the freed slaves so they'd accept "their place" again under white domination. President Andrew Johnson gave the Klan a free hand until he was impeached. Then Reconstruction came in and for a time protected Black rights. It didn't go far enough. It didn't do what the U.S. did in Japan after World War II (and what Thaddeus Stevens advocated), breaking up the large estates and giving land to the ex-slaves so they had the property and the means to resist.

Interestingly enough at the same time Lincoln was wrestling with the 13th Amendment Karl Marx wrote to Lincoln on behalf of the International Working Men's Association. He wrote, "The workingmen of Europe feel sure that, as the American War of Independence initiated a new era of ascendancy for the middle class, so the American Antislavery War will do for the working classes. They consider it an earnest of the epoch to come that it fell to the lot of Abraham Lincoln, the single-minded son of the working class, to lead his country through the matchless struggle for the rescue of an enchained race and the reconstruction of a social world. "

Marx had confidence that Lincoln would reconstruct the American social order to ensure the "ascendancy" of the working class. That was a fair judgment. Lincoln, after all, had just sent General Sherman to burn his way to Savannah. You think Abe would appoint Robert E. Lee to become his Defense Secretary?

Alas, as the U.S. terrorizes the world, festers in inequality, keeps a million Blacks in prison and leads the carbon-burning orgy, there's no Lincoln anywhere on the horizon.

 

Stanley Heller writes about the Middle East at www.TheStruggle.org. He writes about the economy, teaching, politics and labor at EconomicUprising.com

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Glenn Beck Hates Unions

South Korea Shot Over 3,600 Shells

Revealed in the "White House Diary"

"Argo", Just Another Assault on Middle Eastern People

John Stewart Slanders the Left

20 Years After the Sanctions

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Jones was terrific in the movie as Thaddeus Steven... by Stanley Heller on Wednesday, Nov 28, 2012 at 2:37:53 PM
According the the vision of the future I believe i... by E. J. N. on Wednesday, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:56:51 PM