Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
7 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Wikileaks: A Peanut Army Topples Global Tyrants

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 10/26/13

Become a Fan
  (8 fans)

opednews.com

The Brave New World of Wikileaks- the "most dangerous website in the world," the website that brought down dictatorships, that was responsible for what was then the biggest US national security leak in history- I had thought Wikileaks represented an army of hackers dedicated to ending secrecy.  

I was wrong. Wikileaks was a peanut army all along, it was run for peanuts, and it brought down some of the greatest world tyrants- without even a slingshot!

Incredibly- "The Fifth Estate" shows the work was done mainly by only two people Julian Assange and his partner Daniel Domscheit-Berg. Further, they put the whole thing together with a few servers and the entire operation cost peanuts!

Peanuts! Talk about changing the world with a gang of two. Surrounding themselves with fake aliases and digital gimmicks to make the world think they were an army. Just as wooden soldiers ruse have been used to confound the enemy in battle.

Anyone could have put Wikileaks together. Why didn't anyone? Why don't the good government groups of the world do it now? The good can be done at a fraction of what we spend on lobbying etc. For example, why does the world whistleblower community represented by the Make It Safe Coalition (MISC) not immediately copy Wikileaks to topple fraudsters at home and abroad?

But that would require the MISC to agree on what the greater good is. That is the rub! History shows that any two whistleblowers will soon disagree on what the greater good is- just as in the film.

The heart of the film is the escalating fight between Assange and Daniel Domscheit-Berg . The two started together as true believers. The mission was simple. Expose secrets and topple tyrants. Worked great. Then the two fought staunch allies broke down into a bitter feud. Assange wanted all secrets published. Daniel wanted to protect innocents, and to carefully redact and respect privacy.

The clash of the two electronic whistleblower prophets greatly degraded Wikileaks capability. Together, Assange and Daniel could do anything. Apart, the mission degraded.

That is the divergence time and again inside of good government groups. I don't think it can be resolved. The civil rights movement was so divided. MLK took a far different approach than Malcolm X.

Unquestionably, the world needs Wikileaks to expose what the mainstream media can't or won't expose. Wikileaks holds a mirror for all countries to see their reflection. And now it is up to the citizens who want a better world- how can we harness and expand Wikileak-type exposure of tyrants?

But who watches the watchers? In "All the Presidents Men," there were very strict lines of accountability and processes to get the story right. Every fact was double checked, double sourced. And even when everything was done right, the story could still go wrong.

Wikileaks, was not able to find accountability. One man makes the decision to go public. And when one man arguably has more power than all the world's press put together, that power goes to the head.

We really need a Wikileaks with accountability. How could such an instrument be built? I'm not sure how, since almost every whistleblower would have a different idea of accountability. In today's society, any one person with a website can anoint himself the supreme Inquisitor.

It is argued that Wikileaks is the electronic equivalent of a few men on an airplane with box cutters. We can't take box cutters away from everyone in the world. Nor can we stop two dedicated men from setting up more Wikileaks.

The film dramatizes the real dilemma of a need for an ethical Wikileaks. The grassroots potential of Wikileaks is beyond staggering. But can greased lightening be controlled and harnessed?

The year 2013 has rightly been dubbed the year of the whistleblower by advocate Dr. Don Soeken. America is a thousand times better off now that we know the astonishing degree of electronic surveillance we are all subject to.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Support WPEA

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

James J. Murtagh, Jr. is a doctor of pulmonary, critical care and sleep medicine, and the Medical Director of several sleep laboratories in Southern Ohio. Dr. Murtagh extensively writes on medical ethics. Dr. Murtagh is the founder of a new (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Sister Aloysius "Doubts"

Sarah Palin is the Ultimate RINO

Patients and Doctors Demand Integrity in Medicine!

Sarah Palin is National Traitor

Should al-Qaeda have the right to bear arms?

Wikileaks: A Peanut Army Topples Global Tyrants

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 7 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Rough Times for WhistleblowersRob Kall wrote the e... by James Murtagh on Saturday, Oct 26, 2013 at 2:18:10 AM
Snowden: We haven't seen anything yet.Snowden has ... by James Murtagh on Saturday, Oct 26, 2013 at 9:12:53 AM
Howard Zinn and Woody Guthrie Have both said that ... by Rob Kall on Saturday, Oct 26, 2013 at 12:27:53 PM
Or...we could all do what Molly Ivins suggested --... by Sheila Samples on Saturday, Oct 26, 2013 at 3:49:46 PM
Hey...should OEN start a version of Wikileaks?The ... by James Murtagh on Saturday, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:55:43 PM
The REAL Reason U.S. Targets Whistleblowers htt... by James Murtagh on Monday, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:53:59 PM
Jesselyn Radack nails the dangers: While I'm ... by James Murtagh on Monday, Oct 28, 2013 at 1:19:41 PM