Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook
  5
Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend
  7
12 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
6 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Why the President Must Come Up With Demand-Side Solutions, And Not Go Over to the Supply Side

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 4   Well Said 3   Supported 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 6/9/11

Become a Fan
  (104 fans)

opednews.com

"I am concerned about the fact that the recovery that we're on is not producing jobs as fast as I want it to happen," President Obama said Tuesday, amid the flood of bad economic news, including last Friday's alarming jobs report.

Does this mean we're about to see a bold package of ideas from the White House for spurring growth of jobs and wages? Sadly, it doesn't seem so.
 
Obama says he's interested in exploring with Republicans extending some of the measures that were part of that tax-cut package "to make sure that we get this recovery up and running in a robust way."
 
Accordingly, the White House is mulling a temporary cut in the payroll taxes businesses pay on wages. White House advisers figure this may appeal to Republican lawmakers who have been discussing the same idea. It would, in essence, match the 2 percent reduction in employee contributions to payroll taxes this year, enacted as part of the deal to extend the Bush tax cuts.
 
Other ideas under consideration at the White House include a corporate tax cut, accompanied by the closing of some corporate tax loopholes.
 
Can we get real for a moment? Businesses don't need more financial incentives. They're already sitting on a vast cash horde estimated to be upwards of $1.6 trillion. Besides, large and middle-sized companies are having no difficulty getting loans at bargain-basement rates, courtesy of the Fed.
 
In consequence, businesses are already spending as much as they can justify economically. Almost two-thirds of the measly growth in the economy so far this year has come from businesses rebuilding their inventories. But without more consumer spending, businesses won't spend more. A robust economy can't be built on inventory replacements.
 
The problem isn't on the supply side. It's on the demand side. Businesses are reluctant to spend more and create more jobs because there aren't enough consumers out there able and willing to buy what businesses have to sell.
 
The reason consumers aren't buying is because consumers' paychecks are dropping, adjusted for inflation. And job losses are mounting. The 83,000 new private-sector jobs created in May represent a net loss because 125,000 jobs are needed merely to keep up with an expanding labor force. The number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment benefits edged higher last week.
 
At the same time, many Americans are falling behind in their mortgage payments. And housing prices continue to drop -- making homeowners feel even poorer.
 
Close to 60 percent of the half-trillion drop in household debt since the depth of recession has been defaults rather than repayments. This makes it harder for people who'd like to enter the housing market to get new mortgage loans, or for anyone to refinance.  Other consumer debt burdens are rising. On Tuesday the Fed reported consumer credit outstanding rose in April -- mostly from record-high levels of student-loan debt and an up-tick in credit-card borrowing due to food and gas price increases outpacing wage gains.
 
All this translates into a continuing crisis on the demand side. Consumers can't and won't buy more. Between January and March, sales grew just .15 percent around the country -- perilously close to no growth at all. May sales look even worse. Chain stores are reporting weaker sales. Consumer confidence has dropped sharply.
 
How to get jobs back, then? By reigniting demand. Put more money in consumers' pockets and help them renegotiate their mortgage loans.
 
For example: Enlarge the payroll tax break for workers -- not just for employers. Exempt the first $20,000 of income from payroll taxes for a year. Create a WPA for the long-term unemployed. Allow distressed homeowners to declare bankruptcy on their primary residences, thereby giving them more clout with lenders to reorganize their mortgage loans. Lend federal money to (rather than bail out) states and cities that are now firing platoons of teachers, fire fighters, and other workers because state and local coffers are empty.
 
But we're not hearing any of these sorts of demand-side solutions from the White House. In seeking Republican votes, Obama is putting forth Republican supply-side ideas -- lowering the employer costs of hiring, cutting corporate taxes -- that have nothing to do with this demand-side crisis. He may attract some Republican votes for these, but what's the point if they're irrelevant to the real problem?
 
The President's putative embrace of the false notion that businesses need more financial incentives in order to hire also risks giving legitimacy to other Republican supply-side nostrums being pushed by House Republicans and GOP presidential aspirants. On Tuesday, Tim Pawlenty called for lower taxes on corporations (down to 15 percent from the current 35 percent), and lower taxes on the rich (to 25 percent from the current 35). Newt Gingrich wants to lower corporate income taxes to 12.5 percent and eliminate the estate tax altogether. And so on.

Better that the President advance ideas that work, and go to battle over them. 

Supply-side economics doesn't work. It's been tried for 30 years, to no avail. And now, when our continuing economic crisis is so palpably being driven by inadequate demand, it's more bogus than ever.
 
The last thing we need is for the President to go over to the supply side.

 

http://robertreich.org/

Robert Reich, former U.S. Secretary of Labor and Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley, has a new film, "Inequality for All," to be released September 27. He blogs at www.robertreich.org.
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Republican's Big Lies About Jobs (And Why Obama Must Repudiate Them)

Paul Ryan Still Doesn't Get It

What Mitt Romney Really Represents

The Minimum Wage, Guns, Healthcare, and the Meaning of a Decent Society

Why the Right-Wing Bullies Will Hold The Nation Hostage Again and Again

The Gas Wars

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

What does Obama have to do short of coming right o... by SherryGT on Friday, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:22:08 AM
All due respect, the evidence so far suggests th... by Herbert Calhoun on Friday, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:23:53 AM
Your firmness of understanding that rewarding Obam... by Larry Kachimba on Saturday, Jun 11, 2011 at 3:56:23 AM
Who is to be our generation's Marriner Eccles and ... by Richard Girard on Friday, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:08:44 PM
Well Robert, if corporate America would remember w... by Kattmanduu on Friday, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:06:35 PM
We know that the once Harvard Law Review and now U... by Larry Kachimba on Saturday, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:05:44 AM