Tags for This Article:

People (2493)  Israel (1428)  Propaganda (1107)  Iraq (1068)  Internet (693)  China (470)  Protest (391)  Pentagon Propaganda (144)  AIPAC (138)  Dissent (136)  Internet Political Use (112)  Internet Neutrality-Protection (108)  Internet Warfare (38)  Internet Regulation (33)  Internet Access (24)  Sharing (17) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
June 19, 2008 at 23:04:55

Why the Pentagon has not shut down the Internet Yet.

by ibrahim turner     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

I received a message asking me to send a message to Google to protest that URUKNET has been deleted from the News service of Google News, which means that no articles will show up when you search for them using the url: URUKNET

Not having heard of this site before I ‘Googled’ it and up it came. There was an article dated from that day, (yesterday) so I was a bit puzzled. There were other entries and I looked at another and there was the letter from Google news stating the reason they had removed URUKNET from the site because it was largely an ‘aggregator’ of other people’s new items, with little original stuff.

I wrote back to the person who sent me the email with this and they promised to get back to me, (she is a busy person running another site).

This got me thinking particularly about Google. We have perhaps heard of the compromise Google and Yahoo have reached with the ‘totalitarian’ regime of China and others restricting what people may see in those countries, and also you may have heard of the soldiers in Iraq not able to use You Tube because the stuff on there might corrupt their delicate minds.

Another thought that led to the title of this piece was that what restrictions do we NOT know about for every one of us? I quite often find a link that when clicked on says it doesn’t exist or that the URL you requested might be spelled wrong or the ‘timed out’ message is displayed. And further; the people who frequent the sites where you can comment are fully aware of the ‘trolls’ who try to sow dissent and argumentation amongst commentators and sometimes they are very clever, often accused of being paid by the GOP and the like.

So why haven’t the Pentagon, or whoever maintains the Internet, not shut it down? After all it is full of anti war, anti AIPAC, anti Israel, anti this and anti that people, and they are gathering momentum by sharing information that could lead to upsetting the applecart of the Military/Industrial/Complex, or do they feel secure with their monolithic self perpetuating gung-ho ideology and that we few will never have the power to unseat them?

Some would immediately jump to the conclusion that the Homeland Security Establishment, The FBI and the other 15 intelligence agencies, (count ‘em) with all their minions are busily monitoring all of us and putting our names on various ‘no-fly’ lists, for when the Halliburton/KBR detention centers need a few thousand dissenters/radicals/inmates. That may be true to some degree, after all Bush’s illegal wire tapping, reading all those emails, poking about in our bank accounts for suspicious payments to Islamic charities/call girls have been going on for some time.

So it seems to me that shutting it down would deprive them of all that lovely data, for mining with their computer ‘wizz kids’ programmes and keeps lots of ‘government beurocrats’ burning the midnight oil, (not from the Middle East) trying to put two and two together to make nine.

They are past masters at ‘national security’, state secrets, foreign policy think tanks and ‘gagging orders’. They already have the lame stream propaganda machine in their pockets and even if they look askance at the Internet and all that potential ‘subversion’ they find it more useful to let it be, albeit with some control through ‘Google’ and monitor the hell out of us all, for future reference and possible ‘actionable intelligence’, ala Obama with Pakistan.

 

A well traveled and slightly worse for wear 72 year old Englishman; widower, several children and grandchildren and a penchant for wondering 'what is the hidden agenda' in almost everything I read. A keen interest in American culture (an oxymoron?) (JOKE!) and politics and an international world view, except where I haven't got first hand experience of the parts of the world I have not visited. Editor of some books about the Qur'an and Islam. Teacher of English in little known countries like Mauritania, Istanbul, Turkey and Morocco.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments

A retired sales ad marketing trainer, escapee from the automobile business, who reads vorciously and writes whenever possible. The rest of the available time is spent doing woodworking or cooking. Lives in central TX, where the weather is great and politics are dubious. Usually logical and sensible but can be very cranky when assaulted by anybody leaning too far to the right and doesn't know it.
Ivan HentschelA retired sales ad marketing trainer, escapee from the automobile business, who reads vorciously and writes whenever possible. The rest of the available time is spent doing woodworking or cooking. Lives in central TX, where the weather is great and politics are dubious. Usually logical and sensible but can be very cranky when assaulted by anybody leaning too far to the right and doesn't know it.

Just wait!

Fear not, my friend. What you fear, may well be near. Charging by the byte is coming soon and is already here in parts of America. Taxing all useage will come next, as well as anything else that can and will be done to make use of the internet prohibitively expensive. One day you can bet that a GE/Halliburton conglom will own the entire www, and whatever does get posted on the web will be subject to Chinese censors. These people and jobs will of course be outsourced in India.

Enjoy it while you can! .com, .net, .org, and .edu will soon all be .gov and you will need a federal permit and license to send your brother a birthday card!  

 

by Ivan Hentschel (5 articles, 0 quicklinks, 8 diaries, 244 comments) on Friday, June 20, 2008 at 8:42:28 AM
 

 

1 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Albright, Clarke, 200 Diplomats Laud Obama's Willingness to Talk Directly to Adversaries Without Preconditions Posted by Stephen Fox

Representatives Were Threatened with "Martial Law" if Bailout Bill Did Not Pass by Patrick Henningsen

Tell Karl, John, Dick, and Sarah in a Letter to the Editor that this Ayers Tactic Just Won't Work! by Stephen Fox

The PRE-PLANNED Financial/Economic 911 of 2008 by Anthony Michael

Palin Hates Native Alaskans, Black Folks Too Posted by Hans Bennett

Palin Debate Performance Deconstructed by Steven Leser

This is Your Nation on White Privilege Posted by Siv O'Neall

All that's missing are the uniforms! Posted by W. Christopher Epler (Bill)

Main Core, PROMIS and the Shadow Government (Pt. 1) by Ed Encho

Nebraska Supreme Court hears voice of policeman's killer that J. Edgar Hoover kept from jury in COINTELPRO case by Michael Richardson

Go To Top 50 Most Popular