Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
1 comment

General News

Why Washington and Tel Aviv Want Hezbollah to Keep Fighting in al-Qusayr

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H3 5/25/13

opednews.com

Why Washington and Tel Aviv Want Hezbollah to Keep Fighting in al-Qusayr

Franklin Lamb

Homs Province, Syria

During a tour of some of the neighborhoods in Homs, Syria's third largest city after Aleppo and Damascus, with a pre-conflict population of approximately 800,000 (nearly half  Homs residents have fled over the past two years) located maybe about 22 miles NE of the current hot-spot of al-Qusayr, this observer engaged is a few interesting conversations.  More accurately labeled diatribes--with some long bearded Sunni fundamentalists who claimed they came from Jabhat al Nusra, (aka Jabhat an-Nuá¹£rah li-Ahl ash-Shām, "Front of Defense for the People of Greater Syria"), and were preparing to return to al Qusayr to fight "the deniers of Allah!"

It is the strategic crossroads town of al-Qusayr, (pre-crisis population close to 20,000) and its environs, which whoever controls, can block supplies and reinforcements to and from Damascus and locations north and east.   For those seeking the ouster of Syria's government, including NATO countries led by Washington,   were their "allies"   to lose   control of al-Qusayr it would mean the cutting off of supplies from along the Lebanese border, from which most of the local opposition's weapons flow and fighters have been smuggled over the past 26 months. If the Assad regime forces regain control of the city, Washington believes they will move north and conquer current opposition positions in Homs and Rastan, both areas being dependent on support from Lebanon and al-Qusayr. Some analysts are saying this morning, with perhaps a bit of hyperbole that as al-Qusayr goes so goes Syria and the National Lebanese Resistance, led by Hezbollah.

If government forces can retake the city it will   put an end to the   Saudi-Qatari green light, in exchange for controlling al-Qusayr, of   the setting up a Salafist emirate in the area which would constitute a threat to the nearly two dozen Shia Lebanese inhabited villages of the Hermel region. If the Syrian army re-takes al-Qusayr, it would also avoid the likelihood of a full-fledged sectarian war on both sides of the border.

Meeting with a few self-proclaimed al Nusra Front militiaman last week, in Homs, one who spoke excellent British English they had plenty to say   to this observer about current events in al Qusayr to which they planned to return the next day to fight enemies "by all means Allah gives us".   One added, when asked if they had confronted Hezbollah: "Of course but Hezbollah can't defeat us. Eventually they will withdraw from Syria on orders from Tehran.   But first enshallah we will bleed Hezbollah with thousands of cut throats", he boasted raucously as nearby kids   cheered and gave V for victory signs, smiles, giggles and cackling all around.

Such Jihadist rants are music to more than a few US congressional and White House ears these days, as once more in this region,   a major US-Israeli carefully calibrated regime change project,   appears to be falling short.

This week, the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted overwhelmingly to arm elements of the Syrian opposition with a recommendation to "provide defense articles, defense services, and military training" directly to the opposition throughout Syria, who naturally, will "have been properly and fully vetted and share common values and interests with the United States".   History teaches that the vetting part would not happen if the scheme is implemented, despite only a few in Congress objecting.

  Perhaps lacking some of his father Ron Paul's insights into US hegemonic plans for this region, Senator Rand Paul did object to the measure and he fumed at his colleagues: "This is an important moment. You will be funding, today, the allies of al Qaeda. It's an irony you cannot overcome."

According to the Hill Rag weekly, veteran war-hawks Senators John McCain and Lindsay Graham, flashed a knowing smile but gave no rebuttal, perhaps realizing that Senator Paul is a bit untutored on the reality of current Obama Administration policy in Syria generally, and for al-Qusayr, in particular.

  Contrary to the shock and anger expressed by Senator Paul, American policy in Syria is   to de facto   assist allies of al Qaeda including the US   "Terrorist-listed"   Al-Nusra Front as well as anti-Iran, anti-Shia and anti-Hezbollah groups gathering near al-Qusayr. These groups currently include, but not limited to,     Ahl al-Athr Brigade, Ahrar al-Sham,   Basha'ir al-Nasr Brigades, Commandos Brigades, Fajr al-Islam Brigades, Independent Farouq Brigades, Khalid bin al-Waleed Brigade, Liwa al-Haq, Liwa al-Sadiq, Al-Nour Brigade, Al-Qusayr Brigade, Suqur al-Fatah, Al-Wadi Brigades, Al-Waleed Brigades and the 77th Brigade among the scores   of other Jihadist cells currently operating in, near, or rushing to, al-Qusayr.

Their victory according to US Senate sources would be a severe blow and   challenge to Iran's rising influence in the region and Iran's   leadership of the increasing regional and global resistance to the Zionist occupiers of Palestine in favor of the full right to return of every ethnically cleansed Palestinian refugee.

While Congress was considering what else to do to help the "rebels", on 5/22/13,   no fewer than 11 so-called "World powers" foreign ministers, including Turkey and Jordan, met in Amman to condemn,   with straight faces, even, tongues in cheek, the "flagrant intervention" in Syria by Hezbollah and Iranian fighters."   They urged their immediate withdrawal from the war-torn country. In a joint statement, the "Friends of Syria" group called "for the immediate withdrawal of Hezbollah and Iranian fighters, and other regime allied foreign fighters from Syrian territory."  

Iran immediately denied that is has troops fighting in Syria claiming through its Foreign Minsitry spokesman Abbas Aragchi, that "The true enemies of Syria make up these accusations to provoke the people of this country."

Meanwhile, not a peep from Amman about any Salafist-Jihadist-Takfuri fighters from more than 30 countries now ravages Syria's population. The truth of the matter is that the governments represented by their foreign ministers this week in Amman, will follow the US lead which means they will assist, despite some cautionary public words, virtually any ally of al-Qaeda whose fighting in Syria may be seen as weakening the Assad government and its supporters in Iran and Lebanon.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Background

* Born and raised in Milwaukie, Oregon, USA
* Health: Excellent
* Home Address: 221 8th Street, NE, Washington DC, 20002

* Languages: English, French, Russian, some (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

'US MUST STOP FUNDING ISRAELI CRIMES'

Why Obama is Declaring War on Syria

Libya's Liberation Front Organizing In The Sahel

Netanyahu to Obama on election: When we say jump, you say how high?

Panic from the Houses of Congress and Aipac?

"Israel disses US while seeking "bi-lateral alliance' with Russia

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Thank you Mr. Franklin P. Lamb.  Once again, ... by Lilly Martin on Sunday, May 26, 2013 at 2:41:10 AM